Skip to content
Back to skills

Confirm The Premise First

ASecurity

Use during design or brainstorming when a user's choice depends on a technical property they assert or imply — state the ground truth of that property before asking downstream questions built on it. Triggers on "should we use X or Y", design trade-off discussions, privacy/data-egress decisions, and any choice that hinges on local-vs-remote, free-vs-paid, sync-vs-async, or reversible-vs-not.

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 6, 2026
ai-agentsgogitbackend

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 6, 2026

npx -y skills add iamakbarsha1/whetstone --skill confirm-the-premise-first --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Confirm The Premise First?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Confirm The Premise First
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/iamakbarsha1-confirm-the-premise-first/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/iamakbarsha1-confirm-the-premise-first)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: confirm-the-premise-first
description: >
  Use during design or brainstorming when a user's choice depends on a
  technical property they assert or imply — state the ground truth of that
  property before asking downstream questions built on it. Triggers on
  "should we use X or Y", design trade-off discussions, privacy/data-egress
  decisions, and any choice that hinges on local-vs-remote, free-vs-paid,
  sync-vs-async, or reversible-vs-not.
---

# Confirm the Premise First

**Type:** Open-source — client-agnostic methodology, no project-specific detail.

**Created by akbarsha — https://github.com/iamakbarsha1**

Distilled from a design dialogue that advanced several questions deep on a
load-bearing wrong assumption before it surfaced by accident.

**Licence:** Released under CC BY 4.0 — share and adapt for any purpose with
credit. Full text: `LICENSE` at the repository root.

**Feedback & Support:** If a rule here proves wrong or needs sharpening,
open an issue on the repository or contact the author at the profile link
above. If the problem is the agent not following a rule below rather than
the rule itself, that's an execution failure — acknowledge and correct it.

## The core rule

When a user's choice hinges on a technical property they assert or imply
(local vs remote, free vs paid, sync vs async, reversible vs not, on-device
vs egress), state the ground truth of that property explicitly BEFORE asking
any downstream questions that depend on it — a one-line "here's what actually
happens" anchor. Questions built on an unverified, load-bearing wrong
assumption are wasted, and the assumption often only surfaces by accident.
For privacy or data-egress decisions especially, confirm the transport
reality first, then ask the policy question.

**Real case (sanitized):** A user chose a local-looking CLI backend believing
it ran inference on-device; it was always remote. Several downstream
data-exposure answers collapsed once that single premise was corrected — the
questions asked before the correction were wasted.

## Pre-flight check — before asking downstream policy questions

- [ ] You identified the technical property the user's choice depends on.
- [ ] You stated its ground truth in one line before asking questions built
      on it.
- [ ] For any privacy/egress decision, you confirmed the transport reality
      (where the data actually goes) before asking the policy question.

If any box is unchecked, you may be spending questions on a wrong premise —
anchor it first.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.