Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Td Feature Qa

ASecurity

Quality-assure integrated tdmcp features: run the four PR gates + recipe/bridge tests, cross-boundary coherence checks (tool schema↔CLI↔docs↔registry, operator↔createable, bridge↔client), and live TouchDesigner validation (preview + post-cook error check) when the bridge is reachable. Use when validating/QA-ing/testing tdmcp tools, checking a feature actually cooks in TD, verifying CLI matches a tool, or gating a release.

6 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/19/2026
ai-agentspythongoreactnodetesting

Works with

climcp

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add hybridlabor-api/aos --skill td-feature-qa --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Td Feature Qa?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Td Feature Qa
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/hybridlabor-api-td-feature-qa/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hybridlabor-api-td-feature-qa)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: td-feature-qa
description: "Quality-assure integrated tdmcp features: run the four PR gates + recipe/bridge tests, cross-boundary coherence checks (tool schema↔CLI↔docs↔registry, operator↔createable, bridge↔client), and live TouchDesigner validation (preview + post-cook error check) when the bridge is reachable. Use when validating/QA-ing/testing tdmcp tools, checking a feature actually cooks in TD, verifying CLI matches a tool, or gating a release."
---

# td-feature-qa — verify it works, not just exists

Most defects here live at **boundaries**, and a tool that returns success can still cook to errors or a black frame. So: read both sides of every boundary together, and check errors **after the network cooks**, not just the `create_*` return flag. Run incrementally — validate each feature as it lands so an early boundary bug doesn't propagate.

## Gates + suites — always run (offline, no TD needed)

- `npm run typecheck` · `npm run build` · `npm test`
- biome via `./node_modules/.bin/biome check .` (NOT `npm run lint` — RTK proxy gives a false ESLint parse error)
- `npm run validate:recipes` · `npm run test:bridge` (`python3 -m unittest discover -s td/tests`)

## Cross-boundary checks — open both sides

| Boundary | Left (producer) | Right (consumer) | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool ↔ CLI | tool's Zod `inputSchema` | command in `src/cli/agent.ts` | every param reachable from CLI; types/defaults align; name maps to the right handler |
| Tool ↔ registry | `register…` export | `layer*/index.ts` + `tools/index.ts` | actually registered + aggregated, not just written |
| Tool ↔ docs | live registry | generated `docs/reference/tools.md` | regenerates and includes the new tool |
| `…Impl` ↔ test | real return / `isError` shape | msw test assertions | test exercises the actual shape, not a cast-away generic |
| Code ↔ TD | operator types created | what this build can create | optype exists + is createable (dir(td) suffix-match over-counts; ~22 names not createable; KB lags ~14 ops) |
| Bridge ↔ client | `td/` endpoint/payload | `touchDesignerClient.ts` + `validators.ts` envelope | response shape matches the Zod validator |

## Live TD validation — when the bridge is up

Policy: **offline gates always; live when available.** Call `get_td_info` first.
- **Bridge up:** build the feature through the agent CLI against the live bridge, capture `get_preview`, and check `get_td_node_errors` **after it cooks**.
- **Bridge offline:** run offline gates, mark live validation **UNVERIFIED — pending bridge** in the report. Do not fail the pipeline for a missing TD.

Live gotchas to rule out before declaring a bug:
- Silent failures: a Level TOP has no `gain` (it's `brightness1`); no cross-container wires (Select TOP).
- Paused timeline: time-dependent chains (motion / frame-diff / feedback / beat) read **0** when `op('/').time.play` is false — check it before concluding a reactive chain is dead.
- Staleness: a connected `mcp__tdmcp__*` runs the **old build** until restarted; editing `td/` doesn't reload the running bridge (`reload_bridge` / restart) — suspect stale modules before "fixing" correct code.
- GLSL: needs `out vec4 fragColor` + a self-supplied time uniform.
- Device sources can hang TD on a macOS permission modal — validate the synthetic/file source first.

## Output

A report at `_workspace/04_qa_<feature|batch>.md` with three explicit buckets — **PASS**, **FAIL** (`file:line` + concrete fix + owning agent), **UNVERIFIED** (what wasn't checked + why, e.g. bridge offline). Never silently skip a check; list it as UNVERIFIED.

## Fix loop

- Send each defect immediately to its owner (`td-builder` for handler/schema/test, `td-integrator` for wiring/CLI/docs); boundary bugs go to **both**. Re-validate after each fix.
- Cap at ~2–3 rounds per feature; if still failing, report a blocker with full findings instead of looping.
- If a gate fails due to a concurrent agent's unrelated in-flight WIP, say so and validate your slice in isolation (`vitest run <yourfile>`).

Attribution

hybridlabor-apihybridlabor-api
View sourceMore from hybridlabor-api →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →