Skip to content
Back to skills

Superpowers Lab

ASecurity

Evaluate experimental Claude workflow skills in an isolated lab with reproducible tasks, observed results, and explicit adoption criteria.

  • 8 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
ai-agentsgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add huytran1120/vietnam-agentic-skills --skill superpowers-lab --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Superpowers Lab?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Superpowers Lab
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/huytran1120-superpowers-lab/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/huytran1120-superpowers-lab)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: superpowers-lab
description: "Evaluate experimental Claude workflow skills in an isolated lab with reproducible tasks, observed results, and explicit adoption criteria."
risk: safe
source: "https://github.com/obra/superpowers-lab"
date_added: "2026-02-27"
---

# Superpowers Lab

## When to Use
- You want to evaluate an experimental workflow from the upstream Superpowers lab before adopting it.
- You need a reproducible comparison of baseline behavior and a proposed skill.

## Workflow
1. Select one experiment from the [upstream lab](https://github.com/obra/superpowers-lab). Read its instructions, status, prerequisites, and license before using it; this entry does not bundle the lab's experiments.
2. Define a small representative task, success criteria, time/cost limits, and the files/tools each run may access. Use disposable fixtures and no production credentials.
3. Record the baseline agent/tool configuration and run the task without the experimental skill. Capture outputs, observed failures, and validation results.
4. Review the experiment's complete content and any commands before loading it. Run the same task with the experimental skill in an isolated workspace under the same permissions and acceptance criteria.
5. Compare the actual outputs and failures. Separate observed improvements from subjective preferences; record changed model/tool settings as confounders.
6. Decide whether to retain, revise, or reject the experiment. Keep production adoption separate from the lab run, and include a rollback/removal plan if adoption is proposed.

## Example
> Compare one lab workflow against our baseline on a disposable bug-fix fixture. Report tests and failure modes without installing it globally.

## Limitations
- Experimental guidance is not a production guarantee. Do not infer compatibility or improvement without a controlled run.
- The original experiment and its fixtures are external prerequisites; report unavailable materials.
- Do not execute unreviewed scripts, expand permissions, or use private production data for the experiment.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.