Screen a person or organisation for adverse media coverage, PEP status, and sanctions exposure — corroboration-gated, returns "review" never "guilty". Use when the user asks to screen someone before onboarding, partnership, or investment; for AML/CTF flows; or for ongoing counterparty monitoring.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Screen Adverse Media?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/huytran1120-screen-adverse-media)
---
name: screen-adverse-media
description: Screen a person or organisation for adverse media coverage, PEP status, and sanctions exposure — corroboration-gated, returns "review" never "guilty". Use when the user asks to screen someone before onboarding, partnership, or investment; for AML/CTF flows; or for ongoing counterparty monitoring.
category: document-verification
risk: critical
source: community
source_repo: Sketchjar/stipple-agent-skills
source_type: community
date_added: "2026-08-31"
author: Sketchjar
tags: [document-verification, fact-checking, stipple, authenticity]
tools: [claude, cursor, gemini, codex]
license: "Apache-2.0"
license_source: "https://github.com/Sketchjar/stipple-agent-skills/blob/main/LICENSE"
---
# Screen Adverse Media
Screen a person or organisation for adverse media coverage, PEP (Politically Exposed Person) status, and sanctions exposure. Apply a **corroboration gate** to every hit: report review needs rather than guilt, and never describe "nothing found" as a clean record. The historical workflow below uses the Stipple API; verify service availability before use.
## When to use
- Authorized AML/CTF due diligence; confirm the applicable legal obligations with a qualified reviewer rather than treating this tool as a mandated compliance check
- Vendor/supplier due diligence before signing
- Investor or LP vetting
- Ongoing counterparty monitoring (re-run periodically, compare warrant IDs)
## Service availability check
The documented Stipple endpoints, schemas and allowances are historical examples, not a verified current service contract. Confirm the intended provider and current official API documentation, pricing and privacy terms before any request or upload. If the document-verification/screening API cannot be confirmed, stop the API workflow and report it unavailable; do not send data to a guessed endpoint or a repurposed domain.
## Instructions
1. **Get the target.** Name of the person or organisation. For document-based screening, a PDF/image of their ID or company extract can also be submitted.
2. **Run the screen.**
Name-based (via MCP — the REST intake is document-based):
```bash
# Via any MCP client pointed at https://www.stipple.sh/mcp:
# tool: screen_adverse_media
# args: {"name": "John Citizen", "entity_type": "person"}
```
Document-based (REST — screens the person/org named in the uploaded document):
```bash
curl -X POST https://www.stipple.sh/v1/adverse-media \
-F "file=@company-extract.pdf" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STIPPLE_API_KEY"
```
3. **Interpret the response.**
- `rating` — the overall screening result ("review", "clear", etc.)
- `hits[]` — adverse media articles: date, title, source, URL, summary
- `pep[]` — PEP signals (empty = none found)
- `sanctions[]` — sanctions list signals (empty = none found)
4. **Report with the right framing.** Non-negotiable framing rules:
| Finding | Correct framing |
|---|---|
| Hits found | "Review recommended — see articles below" (never "guilty") |
| Nothing found | "No corroborated adverse media found — this is NOT a clean record; coverage is bounded by the source list" |
| PEP signal | "PEP status identified — enhanced due diligence may apply" |
5. **Contextualize.** Do not assume the API corroborates every hit. Inspect the linked primary records, resolve identity matches and distinguish allegations from findings. Date-range and source-coverage limitations must accompany the report.
## Output format
```
screening rating: review
adverse media hits:
- [2025-11-02] Court action over unpaid supplier debts
source: The Age https://...
- [2024-06-18] ASIC disqualification
source: ASIC media releases https://...
PEP signals: 0
sanctions list signals: 0
This screen returns "review", never "guilty" — every hit is corroboration-gated.
```
## Limitations and Safety
- Screening processes personal data and potentially damaging allegations through a
hosted third party. Confirm a lawful purpose, obtain any required approval, send
only the minimum identifiers needed, and verify current retention, residency,
access, and deletion terms before transmission.
- Name matches, PEP signals, sanctions hits, and media reports can be incomplete,
stale, misattributed, or false. Corroborate every consequential result with the
original source and authoritative registers; never publish an allegation as fact.
- This is not a legal AML/CTF determination. A qualified human reviewer must resolve
identity ambiguity, document the reasoning, and provide an appropriate correction
or appeal path before rejecting or restricting a person or organization.
## Notes
- Costs 3 credits per screen; free weekly allowance applies
- For AML flows, pair with `check-identity-pack` (identity) and `verify-document` (document genuineness)
- "Nothing found" ≠ "clean record" — always state this in reports
- Free key at https://www.stipple.sh for metering beyond the anonymous allowance