Skip to content
Back to skills

Creating A Coral Task

ASecurity

Author a new CORAL task — the three pieces that must line up (`task.yaml`, `seed/`, a packaged `grader/`), the `coral init` → `coral validate` → smoke-test loop, and how to pick a grader pattern (stdout float, test pass-rate, ratio-vs-baseline, multi-metric, or an LLM rubric judge). Use whenever the user wants to create a CORAL task, write or wire a grader, port a benchmark into CORAL, score open-ended outputs (reports/memos) with a judge, or debug a grader that crashes on the seed / ranks th...

  • 1,003 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added August 31, 2026
ai-agentspythongobashgitapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 5 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned August 31, 2026

npx -y skills add Human-Agent-Society/CORAL --skill creating-a-coral-task --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Creating A Coral Task?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Creating A Coral Task
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/human-agent-society-creating-a-coral-task/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/human-agent-society-creating-a-coral-task)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: creating-a-coral-task
description: Author a new CORAL task — the three pieces that must line up (`task.yaml`, `seed/`, a packaged `grader/`), the `coral init` → `coral validate` → smoke-test loop, and how to pick a grader pattern (stdout float, test pass-rate, ratio-vs-baseline, multi-metric, or an LLM rubric judge). Use whenever the user wants to create a CORAL task, write or wire a grader, port a benchmark into CORAL, score open-ended outputs (reports/memos) with a judge, or debug a grader that crashes on the seed / ranks the leaderboard backwards / leaks the answer key. Deep references for the TaskGrader API, grader patterns, rubric judges, and the full task.yaml schema live alongside this skill.
---

# Creating a CORAL task

A CORAL task is **three things that must line up**. Scaffold them with `coral init`, then iterate `edit → coral validate` until the grader scores the seed.

```
my-task/
├── task.yaml      # config: name, description, grader entrypoint, agent count
├── seed/          # starter code agents see at t=0 (this is workspace.repo_path)
│   └── solution.py
└── grader/        # standalone Python package — gets its own isolated venv
    ├── pyproject.toml
    └── src/my_task_grader/
        ├── __init__.py
        └── grader.py     # class Grader(TaskGrader): ...
```

The packaged grader is the **only supported form** — it gives the grader an isolated venv and bundles everything the eval needs (grader code, helpers, hidden answer keys). There is no `eval/grader.py` auto-discovery anymore.

> **Optimizing code the user already has?** Scaffold inside a `.coral_workspace/` at the root of their project (gitignored), and copy the code to optimize into `seed/` — keeps CORAL's task/results out of their source tree. The `coral-quickstart` skill has the end-to-end `.coral_workspace/` flow; this skill covers the grader you'll write once the code is in `seed/`.
>
> **"Optimize this" is a build instruction, not a question — never answer it with a process menu.** A 1/2/3 like "point me to a task / create one / optimize outside coral" is the failure mode; do not produce it. The absence of a `task.yaml` is not ambiguity — it just means you build one from the current repo. Concretely: (1) dig for what's already measurable — a research/framework repo almost always ships an eval/benchmark script, a test suite, or a metric in its README/paper; that's your target and metric. (2) If no single number is obvious, **construct** one by wrapping the repo's existing evaluation — don't conclude "no measurable objective" just because there's no CORAL scaffold. (3) Scaffold the most plausible target and start building (a `.coral_workspace/` + draft grader is cheap and reversible); state your assumption in one line and proceed. (4) Only as a last resort, if you've actually read the repo and it exposes nothing scorable, propose 2-3 **concrete** optimization targets you found (each with its metric), pick the most likely, and scaffold that — still not a process menu.

## The loop

```bash
coral init my-task        # scaffold all three pieces (a runnable end-to-end example)
cd my-task
# ... edit the three pieces for your problem ...
coral validate .          # bootstraps the grader venv, runs the grader on seed/, prints a score
# repeat edit → validate until the seed scores as you expect
```

**`coral validate` succeeding is the one checkpoint that matters** — it proves the grader can score the seed. Most "agents are stuck, every eval fails" reports trace to a grader that crashes on the seed, which validate would have caught. Always start from `coral init` rather than hand-writing the layout; the generated files are the canonical minimal example.

## The three pieces

**1. The seed** (`seed/`) — what the agent checks out at t=0 and what the grader later scores. The contract between seed and grader is the **program file**: a file (e.g. `solution.py`) with a function or stdout convention the grader invokes, named in `grader.args.program_file`. Put a **real, runnable baseline** here — agents should `coral eval` immediately and get a non-zero score to beat. A skeleton that crashes is a bad baseline. Runtime data goes under `seed/data/` and is read by relative path.

**2. The grader** (`grader/`) — subclass `TaskGrader`, implement `evaluate()`, return a number (or `ScoreBundle`). The minimum:

```python
from coral.grader import TaskGrader


class Grader(TaskGrader):
    def evaluate(self) -> float:
        result = self.run_program(self.args.get("program_file", "solution.py"))
        if result.returncode != 0:
            return self.fail(f"crashed: {result.stderr[:200]}")
        try:
            return float(result.stdout.strip())
        except ValueError:
            return self.fail(f"expected a float, got {result.stdout[:80]!r}")
```

This stdout-float shape is one of several. **Pick the pattern that matches how your task scores** → [references/cookbook.md](references/cookbook.md):

| Score by... | Pattern |
|---|---|
| A number the program prints | stdout float |
| Fraction of hidden tests passing | test pass-rate |
| Improvement over a baseline | ratio vs baseline |
| Several weighted criteria | multi-metric `ScoreBundle` |
| An LLM judging a report/memo/doc | rubric judge → [references/rubric-judges.md](references/rubric-judges.md) |

Full `TaskGrader` surface — every attribute (`self.codebase_path`, `self.private_dir`, `self.args`, `self.eval_logs_dir`, `self.tune`) and method (`run_program`, `run_script`, `run_script_json`, `score`, `fail`, `bundle`) — is in [references/grader-api.md](references/grader-api.md).

**3. The task.yaml** — wiring. The fields that must be right are `grader.entrypoint`, `grader.direction`, and `workspace.repo_path: ./seed`. Full annotated schema (agents, islands, sharing, gateway, all defaults) → [references/task-yaml.md](references/task-yaml.md).

## Hidden data

The single rule: **everything inside the `grader/` package is visible to agents** — the whole grader source is surfaced read-only at `<shared_dir>/grader/` so they can read how they're scored — so secrets go in **`grader.private`**, in a dir **outside** `grader/`. CORAL copies those paths into `.coral/private/` (which every runtime is denied read access to) and the grader reads them via `self.private_dir`. Declare a sibling, conventionally `taskdata` (resolving to `<task_dir>/taskdata`); a `grader.private` path *inside* `grader/` would be copied to `.coral/private/` **and** leaked via the surfaced source, so `coral validate` errors on it. Non-secret bundled data (lookup tables, helper modules) may sit inside `grader/` and be read via `Path(__file__).parent / ...` — it's visible, so never put a secret there. Never put an answer key under `seed/` either — agents read `seed/` and will game the score.

## Smoke-test, then scale

```bash
coral start -c task.yaml agents.count=1 run.session=local   # one agent, foreground
# watch for one real eval, confirm the score moves, then:
coral stop
```

Once one agent evals cleanly, raise `agents.count`. Driving the run from here is the `running-coral-experiments` skill.

## Common mistakes

| Mistake | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| `repo_path` points at the task root, not `./seed` | Grader sees `task.yaml`/`grader/` in `codebase_path` | Point `repo_path` at `./seed`. |
| `direction` backwards | Leaderboard ordered upside down | "ratio, higher better" → `maximize`; "raw error/latency" → `minimize`. |
| Answer key under `seed/` or anywhere inside `grader/` | Agents read it and game the score — `seed/` is their repo and the whole `grader/` source is surfaced at `<shared_dir>/grader/` | Put it under `grader.private` **outside** `grader/` (sibling `taskdata/`), read via `self.private_dir`; `coral validate` errors on a private path inside `grader/`. |
| Grader writes under `self.codebase_path` and re-reads it | Files vanish — daemon force-removes the worktree after each eval | Write under `self.eval_logs_dir`. |
| Grader uses `sys.executable` | Misses task deps from `workspace.setup` | Use `self.get_python_command()` / `self.run_program` / `self.run_script`. |
| Runtime deps in `grader.setup` | Validate passes, the run fails every eval | Runtime deps → `workspace.setup`; grader-only deps → `grader.setup`. |
| Scoring speed without a correctness gate | Agents "optimize" by returning garbage fast | Gate on correctness first, then score the metric. |
| `parallel.max_workers > 1` with an unsafe grader | Sporadic port/GPU/scratch collisions | Leave at `1` unless provably concurrency-safe. |
| Skipping `coral validate` | Agents start, fail every eval identically | Always validate first. |

When in doubt, run `coral init throwaway` and read the generated files. Full config schema: https://coral.compounding-intelligence.ai/docs/api/config

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md8.7 KB
  • references/cookbook.md7.4 KB
  • references/grader-api.md6.1 KB
  • references/rubric-judges.md4 KB
  • references/task-yaml.md5.3 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.