'Use when at the entry point of SLAW processing when you have centroided
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill peak-picking-algorithm-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Peak Picking Algorithm Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/holobiomicslab-peak-picking-algorithm-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: peak-picking-algorithm-selection
description: 'Use when at the entry point of SLAW processing when you have centroided
mzML or netCDF LC-MS files and need to decide which peak-picking algorithm to use.
Trigger this skill when: (1) raw LC-MS data must be converted into a feature matrix;'
license: CC-BY-4.0
metadata:
edam_operation: http://edamontology.org/operation_3634
edam_topics:
- http://edamontology.org/topic_3370
- http://edamontology.org/topic_0121
tools:
- Centwave
- FeatureFinderMetabo
- ADAP
- SLAW
techniques:
- LC-MS
license_tier: open
provenance_tier: literature
derived_from:
- doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02687
title: slaw
evidence_spans:
- 'Wrapping of three main peak picking algorithms: Centwave, FeatureFinderMetabo,
ADAP'
claims: []
provenance:
collection: https://w3id.org/holobiomicslab/asb-skill/collection/metabolomics/v2
assembled_by: scripts/collect_metabolomics_collection.py
sources:
- build: coll_slaw_cq
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02687
title: slaw
dedup_kept_from: coll_slaw_cq
schema_version: 0.2.0
attribution:
generator: AgenticScienceBuilder
original_doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02687
all_source_dois:
- 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02687
zenodo_doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20794027
curators: []
promoter: Louis-Félix Nothias
sponsor: CNRS & Université Côte d'Azur
---
# peak-picking-algorithm-selection
## Summary
Select and route untargeted LC-MS data through one of three wrapped peak-picking algorithms (Centwave, FeatureFinderMetabo, or ADAP) via configuration-driven dispatch, producing standardized feature matrices with m/z, retention time, and intensity columns. This skill encapsulates the conditional logic that allows users to choose the most suitable algorithm for their LC-MS data characteristics without reimplementing each algorithm wrapper.
## When to use
Apply this skill at the entry point of SLAW processing when you have centroided mzML or netCDF LC-MS files and need to decide which peak-picking algorithm to use. Trigger this skill when: (1) raw LC-MS data must be converted into a feature matrix; (2) you can specify which of the three algorithms (Centwave, FeatureFinderMetabo, ADAP) best matches your chromatography type, sample complexity, or prior tuning experience; (3) you want the output features normalized to a common schema for downstream alignment and grouping steps. Do not use if you already have a pre-computed peak table or if your MS data are in profile (non-centroided) format.
## When NOT to use
- Input LC-MS data are in profile (non-centroided) format; centroid conversion must precede this skill.
- A feature table has already been generated by external peak picking; use alignment and grouping skills directly.
- MS data are DIA (data-independent acquisition) mode; SLAW and its three peak pickers support DDA only.
## Inputs
- centroided LC-MS data files in mzML or netCDF format (MS1 ± DDA-MS2)
- algorithm selection parameter (string: 'Centwave', 'FeatureFinderMetabo', or 'ADAP')
- algorithm-specific parameters (ppm tolerance, chromatographic peak width, minimum signal intensity, etc.)
- sample metadata including polarity (positive or negative) and sample type (QC, sample, MS2, blank)
## Outputs
- standardized feature matrix with columns: m/z, retention time, peak intensity
- algorithm metadata (algorithm name, parameters applied, execution time)
- peak detection quality metrics (number of features detected, signal-to-noise ratio estimates)
- feature-level annotations (e.g., isotope patterns, adduct assignments from algorithm output)
## How to apply
Configure the SLAW parameters.txt file to specify the target peak-picking algorithm (Centwave, FeatureFinderMetabo, or ADAP) by name. The routing mechanism reads this configuration key and instantiates the corresponding algorithm wrapper module. Load your centroided LC-MS data (mzML or netCDF) and associated metadata (polarity, sample type from samples.csv). Invoke the selected algorithm wrapper with optimized or user-specified parameter sets (e.g., ppm tolerance, minimum intensity threshold, chromatographic peak width). Execute the peak picking on the raw data, producing an algorithm-specific output (e.g., feature table with detector-dependent columns). Standardize this output to the SLAW internal format by extracting and aligning m/z, retention time, and peak intensity columns. Return the standardized feature matrix and algorithm metadata (algorithm name, parameters used, execution timestamp) to the caller for continuation through alignment, grouping, and gap-filling stages.
## Related tools
- **Centwave** (One of three wrapped peak-picking algorithms; uses continuous wavelet transform for feature detection in mzML/netCDF data.)
- **FeatureFinderMetabo** (One of three wrapped peak-picking algorithms; optimized for metabolomic LC-MS data with emphasis on small molecules.)
- **ADAP** (One of three wrapped peak-picking algorithms; adaptive data analysis approach for complex chromatographic peak detection.)
- **SLAW** (Container and orchestration framework that wraps the three peak pickers and routes data through selected algorithm based on configuration.) — https://github.com/zamboni-lab/SLAW
## Examples
```
docker run --rm -v /path/to/input:/input -v /path/to/output:/output zambonilab/slaw:latest # After editing parameters.txt to set algorithm='Centwave' and optimization enabled
```
## Evaluation signals
- Output feature matrix contains exactly three required columns (m/z, retention time, peak intensity) with valid numeric ranges (m/z > 0, retention time >= 0, intensity >= 0).
- Number of detected features is consistent with prior runs on the same algorithm or within expected range for sample type (QC samples typically yield more reproducible features than blanks).
- Algorithm metadata includes the selected algorithm name, parameters used, and execution timestamp; metadata matches the configuration.txt settings.
- Standardized feature matrix schema is identical regardless of which algorithm was selected; downstream alignment and grouping steps process output identically.
- Feature intensity distributions and m/z clustering patterns are visually distinct between Centwave, FeatureFinderMetabo, and ADAP outputs on the same input (e.g., Centwave detects fewer but more intense peaks; FeatureFinderMetabo emphasizes low-mass metabolites).
## Limitations
- Only DDA (data-dependent acquisition) MS2 are supported; DIA-MS2 spectra will be skipped or cause processing errors.
- All LC-MS data must be centroided and of a single polarity per run; mixed-polarity or profile-mode data require preprocessing outside SLAW.
- Algorithm selection is static per SLAW execution; switching algorithms requires rerunning the container with modified parameters.txt.
- Peak-picking output quality depends critically on algorithm-specific parameter tuning; poor parameter choices can yield feature tables with low feature reproducibility across QC replicates.
- The three wrapped algorithms have different computational footprints and runtimes; Centwave is fastest, FeatureFinderMetabo and ADAP may require more memory and wall-clock time on thousands of samples.
## Evidence
- [other] SLAW wraps three independent peak picking algorithms—Centwave, FeatureFinderMetabo, and ADAP—enabling configurable selection among them for the peak-picking stage: "SLAW wraps three independent peak picking algorithms—Centwave, FeatureFinderMetabo, and ADAP—enabling configurable selection among them for the peak-picking stage of untargeted LC-MS processing."
- [other] Route the data to the corresponding algorithm wrapper module based on the configuration key. Execute the selected peak-picking algorithm on the input data with the specified parameters. Standardize the output peak table to a common internal format (e.g., feature matrix with m/z, retention time, intensity columns).: "Route the data to the corresponding algorithm wrapper module based on the configuration key. Execute the selected peak-picking algorithm on the input data with the specified parameters. Standardize"
- [readme] Raw MS data in mzML format. Files can include MS1 and DDA-MS2 scans. DIA-MS is not supported. All data must be centroided and of unique polarity.: "Raw MS data in mzML format. Files can include MS1 and DDA-MS2 scans. DIA-MS is not supported. All data must be centroided and of unique polarity."
- [readme] Wrapping of three main peak picking algorithms: Centwave, FeatureFinderMetabo, ADAP: "Wrapping of three main peak picking algorithms: Centwave, FeatureFinderMetabo, ADAP"
- [other] Return the standardized peak table and algorithm metadata to the caller for downstream SLAW stages (alignment, grouping, gap-filling).: "Return the standardized peak table and algorithm metadata to the caller for downstream SLAW stages (alignment, grouping, gap-filling)."
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!