Use when after an end-to-end neural model (CNN + transformer) has generated
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill molecular-structure-ground-truth-matching-and-accuracy-evaluation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Molecular Structure Ground Truth Matching And Accuracy Evaluation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/holobiomicslab-molecular-structure-ground-truth-matching-and-accu-asb-skill-collections)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: molecular-structure-ground-truth-matching-and-accuracy-evaluation
description: Use when after an end-to-end neural model (CNN + transformer) has generated
predicted molecular structures (formula and connectivity) from 1D NMR spectra.
license: CC-BY-4.0
metadata:
edam_operation: http://edamontology.org/operation_3802
edam_topics:
- http://edamontology.org/topic_0154
- http://edamontology.org/topic_3172
- http://edamontology.org/topic_3577
tools:
- convolutional neural network
- transformer architecture
techniques:
- NMR
license_tier: open
provenance_tier: literature
derived_from:
- doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.4c01132
title: NMR2Struct
evidence_spans: []
claims: []
provenance:
collection: https://w3id.org/holobiomicslab/asb-skill/collection/metabolomics/v2
assembled_by: scripts/collect_metabolomics_collection.py
sources:
- build: coll_nmr2struct
doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.4c01132
title: NMR2Struct
dedup_kept_from: coll_nmr2struct
schema_version: 0.2.0
attribution:
generator: AgenticScienceBuilder
original_doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.4c01132
all_source_dois:
- 10.1021/acscentsci.4c01132
zenodo_doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20794027
curators: []
promoter: Louis-Félix Nothias
sponsor: CNRS & Université Côte d'Azur
---
# molecular-structure-ground-truth-matching-and-accuracy-evaluation
## Summary
Compares predicted molecular structures (formula and connectivity) against experimentally known ground-truth structures to compute exact recovery rates and other fidelity metrics. This skill is essential for validating end-to-end NMR-to-structure models on molecules up to 19 heavy atoms.
## When to use
After an end-to-end neural model (CNN + transformer) has generated predicted molecular structures (formula and connectivity) from 1D NMR spectra. Use this skill to quantify how many predictions exactly match the experimentally determined ground-truth structures in a held-out test set, yielding top-k exact structure recovery rates that reflect real-world accuracy.
## When NOT to use
- When predicted structures have not yet been generated by the model; this skill is a validation step, not a prediction step.
- When comparing spectra or spectral features directly without intermediate structure prediction—use spectral similarity metrics instead.
- When ground-truth structures are not available or are unreliable; accuracy evaluation requires experimentally confirmed reference structures.
## Inputs
- predicted molecular structures (SMILES strings or connectivity graphs) from the end-to-end model
- ground-truth molecular structures (canonical SMILES or adjacency matrices) for test molecules
- test set metadata (molecule identifiers, heavy atom counts ≤19)
- model confidence scores or ranking for top-k evaluation
## Outputs
- top-k exact structure recovery rates (e.g., top-1, top-5, top-10 accuracy percentages)
- count of exact matches and mismatches per test molecule
- accuracy metrics stratified by molecular size (heavy atom counts)
- detailed match/mismatch report for error analysis
## How to apply
Load the ground-truth molecular structures (canonical SMILES or connectivity graphs) for the test set molecules (≤19 heavy atoms). For each predicted structure output by the model, perform a canonical comparison (e.g., SMILES normalization or graph isomorphism) against its corresponding ground-truth structure. Count exact matches (both molecular formula and connectivity must match) and compute top-k metrics by ranking predictions by model confidence. Report the fraction of test molecules where the top-1, top-5, or top-10 prediction contains the correct structure. Cross-validate that the ground-truth set is disjoint from training and validation sets to avoid inflated metrics.
## Related tools
- **convolutional neural network** (encodes raw 1D NMR spectra into learned feature representations upstream of structure prediction)
- **transformer architecture** (assembles spectral features and molecular fragments into connectivity predictions that are then matched against ground truth)
## Evaluation signals
- Top-k accuracy metrics (top-1, top-5, top-10) are computed and match or exceed the paper's reported baseline performance on the same test set.
- Exact matches are verified by canonical SMILES comparison or graph isomorphism to exclude false positives from different but equivalent structural representations.
- Ground-truth test set is confirmed to be disjoint from training and validation splits (no data leakage).
- Accuracy is stratified by molecular size (heavy atom bins) and shows consistent recovery rates across the ≤19 heavy atom range reported in the paper.
- Mismatch cases are inspectable: predicted vs. ground-truth structures can be visually inspected or dumped to a report for error classification (e.g., wrong formula, correct formula but wrong connectivity).
## Limitations
- The skill is limited to test molecules with ≤19 heavy atoms, as the model was trained and validated only in this regime; extrapolation to larger molecules is not supported by the paper.
- Accuracy depends on the quality and completeness of the ground-truth reference structures; experimental errors or missing reference data will bias metrics.
- Top-k metrics assume the model outputs a ranked list of candidate structures; if only a single prediction is returned, only top-1 accuracy can be computed.
- The skill does not account for stereoisomerism or 3D conformation; it evaluates connectivity and formula only, so molecules differing only in stereochemistry will be treated as different structures.
## Evidence
- [intro] end-to-end structure recovery accuracy metrics: "What are the exact structure recovery accuracy metrics achieved by the end-to-end NMR2Struct model on test molecules containing up to 19 heavy atoms?"
- [intro] multitask prediction generates formula and connectivity: "Perform multitask prediction to generate both molecular formula and connectivity output."
- [intro] top-k comparison against ground truth: "Compute top-k exact structure recovery rates by comparing predicted structures against ground-truth molecular structures."
- [intro] model outputs structure from spectra: "predicts the molecular structure (formula and connectivity) of an unknown compound solely based on its 1D 1H and/or 13C NMR spectra"
- [intro] scope: molecules up to 19 heavy atoms: "We demonstrate the effectiveness of this framework on molecules with up to 19 heavy (non-hydrogen) atoms"
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!