Explicit-only implementation workflow for a confirmed specification or OpenSpec change whose target and acceptance contract are settled. Not for route selection, proposal authoring, review, debugging without a confirmed cause, or release. Output: ordered implementation and verification evidence, or an explicit blocker.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Flow Drive?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hmj1026-flow-drive-dhpk)
---
name: flow-drive
argument-hint: '<confirmed-spec-or-change-id> [--plan[=<model>:<effort>]] [--worker=<worker>] [--worker-target=<provider>/<model>[:<effort>]] [--cross-provider] [--reasoner=<provider>/<model>[:<effort>]] [--architect|--no-architect]'
description: 'Explicit-only implementation workflow for a confirmed specification or OpenSpec change whose target and acceptance contract are settled. Not for route selection, proposal authoring, review, debugging without a confirmed cause, or release. Output: ordered implementation and verification evidence, or an explicit blocker.'
disable-model-invocation: true
metadata:
dhpk-invocation-class: explicit-only
---
# Flow Drive
Use `$flow-drive <confirmed-spec-or-change-id> [implementation-options]` only
after the specification, target, and acceptance boundary are confirmed. When
ownership is unclear, return an explicit blocker or use the separately invoked
route owner; use the external OpenSpec authoring owner when a proposal or
artifact is still missing. Flow Drive consumes the shared neutral handoff
contract and does not load a peer skill to validate its input.
## When NOT to Use
- The route, target, or acceptance contract is unclear: return a blocker with
the missing evidence; do not infer a route or load a peer skill. A separately
invoked `flow-guide route` may provide a handoff, but Flow Drive never calls
it as a prerequisite.
- A proposal or OpenSpec artifact still needs authoring: use external `$openspec-propose`.
- The task is review-only or diagnostic-only: use `change-verdict` or `code-trace`.
- Commit, release, deployment, or archive authority has not been separately granted.
## Boundary
Flow Drive owns implementation of the confirmed work. It does not choose a
route, author a proposal, review an existing diff, or claim archive, commit,
merge, release, deployment, or pilot evidence. Its explicit-only boundary is
preserved even when a caller presents a ready-looking route.
## Implementation contract
1. Read the confirmed specification or change artifacts in order. Resolve
repository instructions, context, target files, nearby tests, and the
verification commands before editing.
2. Convert the work into dependency-ordered observable items. Preserve
OpenSpec task order and leave incomplete tasks unchecked.
An OpenSpec apply with two or more unchecked tasks requires the planner
gate before workspace writes; record the policy-approved skip for one task.
3. At each behavior boundary, run the smallest non-tautological test first,
make the smallest compatible edit, inspect the diff, and run the focused
verification. Preserve unrelated dirty work.
4. Keep planner, worker, reasoner, and architecture choices within the
implementation policy. Optional backends are explicit and cannot silently
replace the current implementer.
5. Stop on an evidence-changing blocker. A rejected or modified item may be
retried at most twice with its failure and current diff supplied as context.
Completion means every ordered item has implementation and verification
evidence, or the report names the exact blocker, skipped check, and resume
action.
## Implementation options
- `--plan[=<model>:<effort>]` requests a planning pass.
- `--worker=<claude|codex|agy|auto>` selects the Worker Selector and preserves
the existing worker-routing enum.
- `--worker-target=<provider>/<model>[:<effort>]` selects an explicit
Provider/Model/Effort Execution Target. It is distinct from `--worker` and
is not an alias for the selector.
- `--cross-provider` permits the explicitly selected provider boundary when
the surrounding policy and evidence allow it.
- `--reasoner=<provider>/<model>[:<effort>]` requests a bounded second opinion
with a Provider-scoped target; canonical Role remains `reasoner`.
- `--architect` or `--no-architect` controls the architecture pass.
- `--codex` is a retired diagnostic and produces a blocking report; it never
grants a peer, backend, or execution shortcut.
These options refine confirmed implementation work; they do not change its
owner or completion contract.
## Output
Report the ordered work items, changed files, tests and static checks, retry
state, unresolved risks, and next handoff. Mark missing evidence as `BLOCKED`
or `NOT RUN`. Keep implementation, verification, and archive as separate
states.
## References
- `references/execution-bundle/rules/execution-policy.md` — selected local
invocation, planning, dispatch, and handoff policy. Its bundle base is the
real parent of that policy file's containing `rules` directory.
- `references/execution-bundle/scripts/lib/flow-handoff-contract.js` — shared
neutral route handoff and evidence boundary; it does not grant execution
authority.
- `references/execution-bundle/` — synchronized local copy of the policy,
contract, catalog, and dispatch files this Skill's scripts and policy depend
on. dhpk maintainers regenerate it with the repository's skill-resource
synchronizer; it is not a consumer step, so never edit it here.
- `scripts/invocation.js` — local invocation parsing; `scripts/dispatch.js` —
dispatch-target resolution over the bundled contracts. Flow Drive has no
mandatory peer Skill dependency.
- `skills/flow-guide/SKILL.md` — optional separately invoked route guidance;
Flow Drive does not load it as a prerequisite.
- An optional consumer-project writing-for-agents guide may be supplied when the
confirmed change edits agent-facing instructions. A missing optional input
does not authorize an ambient parent lookup.
## Verification
- [ ] A confirmed specification or change identifier was supplied.
- [ ] Repository context and verification commands were read before edits.
- [ ] Work was ordered by dependency and each item has observable evidence.
- [ ] Retried items stay within the two-attempt ceiling.
- [ ] OpenSpec task state, unresolved blockers, and next handoff are explicit.