**arXiv ID:** 2606.06539 **Authors:** Yucheng Chen **Published:** 2026-06-04T04:01:01Z **Abstract:** Forward-Forward (FF) learning [Hinton, 2022] replaces backpropagation with strictly layer-local goodness updates. Recent FF-CNN work has narrowed the gap to BP on 32x32 benchmarks, raising the question of whether layer-local training is becoming a viable alternative at realistic scale. To probe this rigorously, we develop DTG-FF -- dynamic temperature goodness, decoupled normalization, and mul...
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill synthetic-benchmarks-overstate-forwardforward-scaling-realdata-limits-of-layerlocal-training --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Synthetic Benchmarks Overstate Forwardforward Scaling Realdata Limits Of Layerlocal Training?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-synthetic-benchmarks-overstate-forwardforward-scal)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
# Synthetic Benchmarks Overstate Forward-Forward Scaling: Real-Data Limits of Layer-Local Training
**arXiv ID:** 2606.06539
**Authors:** Yucheng Chen
**Published:** 2026-06-04T04:01:01Z
**Abstract:**
Forward-Forward (FF) learning [Hinton, 2022] replaces backpropagation with strictly layer-local goodness updates. Recent FF-CNN work has narrowed the gap to BP on 32x32 benchmarks, raising the question of whether layer-local training is becoming a viable alternative at realistic scale. To probe this rigorously, we develop DTG-FF -- dynamic temperature goodness, decoupled normalization, and multi-layer fusion -- as an instrument that sets FF-family state of the art across nine real-data benchmarks (91.8% CIFAR-10 and the first FF baseline at ImageNet-100 224x224), and use it to audit how far layer-local training actually scales.
(1) Real-data scaling. Under identical recipe and backbone, an architecture-matched BP-DeepSup baseline beats DTG-FF by 2.40/5.93 pp on CIFAR-10/CIFAR-100, and the gap widens with class count. At 224x224 the same instrument reaches only 49.4% -- the first FF baseline at this scale, versus typical BP above 75% [Tian et al., 2020] -- exposing a real-data ceiling invisible at 32x32.
(2) Synthetic vs. real K-conflict. DTG-FF increasingly outperforms BP as class count K grows on synthetic teacher-student tasks, yet on real images the FF-BP gap reverses sign and widens with K. A within-dataset CIFAR-100 coarse vs. fine probe isolates label-hierarchy from image distribution: synthetic K-sweeps confound output dimensionality with fine-grained discrimination difficulty and thereby overstate FF transferability.
(3) Systems audit. FF can be implemented without storing depth-wide activations, but on commodity 8 GB hardware standard BP+gradient-accumulation reaches 4.18 GB / 157 imgs/s versus DTG-FF's 7.90 GB / 138 imgs/s, so a memory-based justification for FF at this scale is not supported under fair baselines.
## Skill Description
This skill is generated from the arXiv paper: Synthetic Benchmarks Overstate Forward-Forward Scaling: Real-Data Limits of Layer-Local Training (2606.06539).
## How to Use
[To be filled in by the user or by future automation]
## References
- [arXiv:2606.06539](http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06539v1)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!