Many reasoning tasks are not well described by a single left-to-right chain: a solver may need to pursue a plausible branch, observe delayed failure, and return to the latest prefix that can still be. Based on arXiv:2607.07492.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill search-fail-recover-a-training-framework-for-correction-aware-reasoning --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Search Fail Recover A Training Framework For Correction Aware Reasoning?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-search-fail-recover-a-training-framework-for-corre)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: search-fail-recover-a-training-framework-for-correction-aware-reasoning
description: 'Many reasoning tasks are not well described by a single left-to-right chain: a solver may need to pursue a plausible branch, observe delayed failure, and return to the latest prefix that can still be. Based on arXiv:2607.07492.'
---
# Search, Fail, Recover: A Training Framework for Correction-Aware Reasoning
**arXiv**: 2607.07492 | **Authors**: Dmitry Beresnev, Vladimir Makharev, Roman Khalikov, Ivan Oseledets, Petr Anokhin | **Utility**: 0.87
## Overview
Many reasoning tasks are not well described by a single left-to-right chain: a solver may need to pursue a plausible branch, observe delayed failure, and return to the latest prefix that can still be completed. We introduce Pyligent, a training and inference framework inspired by the Diligent Learner formulation that represents reasoning as validated search over partial solution chains. A task validator labels generated continuations and failures, and the resulting search trees are converted into supervised targets for three actions: continue, finish, and backtrack, with optional traces that summarize abandoned branches. We evaluate Pyligent on a hidden directed graph task designed to isolate delayed-failure recovery, and on structured reasoning domains with exact validators, including $4{\times}4$ Sudoku, Sudoku with reasoning traces, and Blocksworld. Compared with gold-only supervised fine-tuning, Pyligent improves solve rate by $72.7$ percentage points on hidden graphs, by $17$ and $18$ points on mixed and expert Sudoku, by $27$ and $14$ points on mixed and expert Sudoku with reasoning traces, and by $13$ points on Blocksworld. These results suggest that explicit failed-branch supervision can teach useful recovery behavior beyond imitation of polished solution chains.
## Key Contributions
1. Many reasoning tasks are not well described by a single left-to-right chain: a solver may need to pursue a plausible branch, observe delayed failure, and return to the latest prefix that can still be completed.
2. We introduce Pyligent, a training and inference framework inspired by the Diligent Learner formulation that represents reasoning as validated search over partial solution chains.
3. A task validator labels generated continuations and failures, and the resulting search trees are converted into supervised targets for three actions: continue, finish, and backtrack, with optional traces that summarize abandoned branches.
4. We evaluate Pyligent on a hidden directed graph task designed to isolate delayed-failure recovery, and on structured reasoning domains with exact validators, including $4{\times}4$ Sudoku, Sudoku with reasoning traces, and Blocksworld.
## Implementation Notes
- **Keywords**: reasoning
- **Categories**: cs.AI
- **Published**: 2026-07-08
## Activation Criteria
Use this skill when working on tasks involving: reasoning.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!