**arXiv ID:** 2105.02810 **Authors:** Bryar A. Hassan, TarikA. Rashid, Seyedali Mirjalili **Published:** 2021-04-30T08:17:19Z **Abstract:** This article presents the data used to evaluate the performance of evolutionary clustering algorithm star (ECA*) compared to five traditional and modern clustering algorithms. Two experimental methods are employed to examine the performance of ECA* against genetic algorithm for clustering++ (GENCLUST++), learning vector quantisation (LVQ) , expectation ma...
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill performance-evaluation-results-of-evolutionary-clustering-algorithm-star-for-clustering-heterogeneous-datasets --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Performance Evaluation Results Of Evolutionary Clustering Algorithm Star For Clustering Heterogeneous Datasets?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-performance-evaluation-results-of-evolutionary-clu)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
# Performance evaluation results of evolutionary clustering algorithm star for clustering heterogeneous datasets
**arXiv ID:** 2105.02810
**Authors:** Bryar A. Hassan, TarikA. Rashid, Seyedali Mirjalili
**Published:** 2021-04-30T08:17:19Z
**Abstract:**
This article presents the data used to evaluate the performance of evolutionary clustering algorithm star (ECA*) compared to five traditional and modern clustering algorithms. Two experimental methods are employed to examine the performance of ECA* against genetic algorithm for clustering++ (GENCLUST++), learning vector quantisation (LVQ) , expectation maximisation (EM) , K-means++ (KM++) and K-means (KM). These algorithms are applied to 32 heterogenous and multi-featured datasets to determine which one performs well on the three tests. For one, ther paper examines the efficiency of ECA* in contradiction of its corresponding algorithms using clustering evaluation measures. These validation criteria are objective function and cluster quality measures. For another, it suggests a performance rating framework to measurethe the performance sensitivity of these algorithms on varos dataset features (cluster dimensionality, number of clusters, cluster overlap, cluster shape and cluster structure). The contributions of these experiments are two-folds: (i) ECA* exceeds its counterpart aloriths in ability to find out the right cluster number; (ii) ECA* is less sensitive towards dataset features compared to its competitive techniques. Nonetheless, the results of the experiments performed demonstrate some limitations in the ECA*: (i) ECA* is not fully applied based on the premise that no prior knowledge exists; (ii) Adapting and utilising ECA* on several real applications has not been achieved yet.
## Skill Description
This skill is generated from the arXiv paper: Performance evaluation results of evolutionary clustering algorithm star for clustering heterogeneous datasets (2105.02810).
## How to Use
[To be filled in by the user or by future automation]
## References
- [arXiv:2105.02810](http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02810v1)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!