**arXiv ID:** 2101.07312 **Authors:** Tobias Huber, Benedikt Limmer, Elisabeth André **Published:** 2021-01-18T19:57:52Z **Abstract:** One of the most prominent methods for explaining the behavior of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents is the generation of saliency maps that show how much each pixel attributed to the agents' decision. However, there is no work that computationally evaluates and compares the fidelity of different saliency map approaches specifically for DRL agents. It is ...
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill benchmarking-perturbationbased-saliency-maps-for-explaining-atari-agents --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Benchmarking Perturbationbased Saliency Maps For Explaining Atari Agents?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-benchmarking-perturbationbased-saliency-maps-for-e)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
# Benchmarking Perturbation-based Saliency Maps for Explaining Atari Agents
**arXiv ID:** 2101.07312
**Authors:** Tobias Huber, Benedikt Limmer, Elisabeth André
**Published:** 2021-01-18T19:57:52Z
**Abstract:**
One of the most prominent methods for explaining the behavior of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents is the generation of saliency maps that show how much each pixel attributed to the agents' decision. However, there is no work that computationally evaluates and compares the fidelity of different saliency map approaches specifically for DRL agents. It is particularly challenging to computationally evaluate saliency maps for DRL agents since their decisions are part of an overarching policy. For instance, the output neurons of value-based DRL algorithms encode both the value of the current state as well as the value of doing each action in this state. This ambiguity should be considered when evaluating saliency maps for such agents. In this paper, we compare five popular perturbation-based approaches to create saliency maps for DRL agents trained on four different Atari 2600 games. The approaches are compared using two computational metrics: dependence on the learned parameters of the agent (sanity checks) and fidelity to the agent's reasoning (input degradation). During the sanity checks, we encounter issues with one approach and propose a solution to fix these issues. For fidelity, we identify two main factors that influence which saliency approach should be chosen in which situation.
## Skill Description
This skill is generated from the arXiv paper: Benchmarking Perturbation-based Saliency Maps for Explaining Atari Agents (2101.07312).
## How to Use
[To be filled in by the user or by future automation]
## References
- [arXiv:2101.07312](http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07312v3)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!