Benchmarking Fairness In Spiking Neural Networks Data Bias Spurious Features And Hardware Effects
ASecurity**arXiv ID:** 2605.27407 **Authors:** Hudi He, Fukun Wang, Zhe Wang, Xinyi Wang, Shuhan Ye, Jiarui Liu, Qing Qing, Ziqi Xu, Xikun Zhang, Renqiang Luo **Published:** 2026-05-08T02:29:00Z **Abstract:** Evaluating fairness in Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) demands rigorous benchmarks that reflect real-world complexities, yet existing assessments remain limited by superficial dataset diversity and idealized hardware assumptions. This work introduces the first systematic fairness benchmark for SNN...
- 3 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 3 views
- Added September 11, 2026
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill benchmarking-fairness-in-spiking-neural-networks-data-bias-spurious-features-and-hardware-effects --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Benchmarking Fairness In Spiking Neural Networks Data Bias Spurious Features And Hardware Effects?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-benchmarking-fairness-in-spiking-neural-networks-d)# Benchmarking Fairness in Spiking Neural Networks: Data Bias, Spurious Features, and Hardware Effects
**arXiv ID:** 2605.27407
**Authors:** Hudi He, Fukun Wang, Zhe Wang, Xinyi Wang, Shuhan Ye, Jiarui Liu, Qing Qing, Ziqi Xu, Xikun Zhang, Renqiang Luo
**Published:** 2026-05-08T02:29:00Z
**Abstract:**
Evaluating fairness in Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) demands rigorous benchmarks that reflect real-world complexities, yet existing assessments remain limited by superficial dataset diversity and idealized hardware assumptions. This work introduces the first systematic fairness benchmark for SNNs, addressing three critical dimensions of realism: (1) demographic coverage gaps in training data, (2) spurious feature leakage (e.g., skin tone as a proxy for class labels), and (3) deployment-environment mismatches (e.g., edge devices with constrained spike encoding). Our framework integrates four cross-demographic datasets with controlled bias injections and three neuromorphic hardware simulators (Loihi 2, SpiNNaker), enabling isolated analysis of fairness-performance trade-offs under resource constraints. Standardized evaluations of 12 state-of-the-art SNNs reveal stark disparities: models trained on biased data exhibit 23\% higher false positive rates for underrepresented groups, while hardware limitations (e.g., reduced spike precision) further amplify accuracy gaps by up to 41\% in edge deployments. Critically, bias mitigation strategies developed for cloud-based SNNs often degrade under resource constraints, highlighting the need for co-design principles that jointly optimize fairness and hardware efficiency. By bridging algorithmic fairness research with neuromorphic engineering, our benchmark provides a foundation for trustworthy SNNs in socially critical applications such as healthcare and autonomous systems. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SNN-Benchmarks-8017.
## Skill Description
This skill is generated from the arXiv paper: Benchmarking Fairness in Spiking Neural Networks: Data Bias, Spurious Features, and Hardware Effects (2605.27407).
## How to Use
[To be filled in by the user or by future automation]
## References
- [arXiv:2605.27407](http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27407v1)
Attribution
Related skills
View all in tools →Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.