Bayesian Deep Convolutional Networks With Many Channels Are Gaussian Processes
ASecurity**arXiv ID:** 1810.05148 **Authors:** Roman Novak, Lechao Xiao, Jaehoon Lee, Yasaman Bahri, Greg Yang, Jiri Hron, Daniel A. Abolafia, Jeffrey Pennington, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein **Published:** 2018-10-11T17:49:41Z **Abstract:** There is a previously identified equivalence between wide fully connected neural networks (FCNs) and Gaussian processes (GPs). This equivalence enables, for instance, test set predictions that would have resulted from a fully Bayesian, infinitely wide trained FCN to be c...
- 3 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 4 views
- Added September 11, 2026
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill bayesian-deep-convolutional-networks-with-many-channels-are-gaussian-processes --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Bayesian Deep Convolutional Networks With Many Channels Are Gaussian Processes?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-bayesian-deep-convolutional-networks-with-many-cha)# Bayesian Deep Convolutional Networks with Many Channels are Gaussian Processes
**arXiv ID:** 1810.05148
**Authors:** Roman Novak, Lechao Xiao, Jaehoon Lee, Yasaman Bahri, Greg Yang, Jiri Hron, Daniel A. Abolafia, Jeffrey Pennington, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein
**Published:** 2018-10-11T17:49:41Z
**Abstract:**
There is a previously identified equivalence between wide fully connected neural networks (FCNs) and Gaussian processes (GPs). This equivalence enables, for instance, test set predictions that would have resulted from a fully Bayesian, infinitely wide trained FCN to be computed without ever instantiating the FCN, but by instead evaluating the corresponding GP. In this work, we derive an analogous equivalence for multi-layer convolutional neural networks (CNNs) both with and without pooling layers, and achieve state of the art results on CIFAR10 for GPs without trainable kernels. We also introduce a Monte Carlo method to estimate the GP corresponding to a given neural network architecture, even in cases where the analytic form has too many terms to be computationally feasible.
Surprisingly, in the absence of pooling layers, the GPs corresponding to CNNs with and without weight sharing are identical. As a consequence, translation equivariance, beneficial in finite channel CNNs trained with stochastic gradient descent (SGD), is guaranteed to play no role in the Bayesian treatment of the infinite channel limit - a qualitative difference between the two regimes that is not present in the FCN case. We confirm experimentally, that while in some scenarios the performance of SGD-trained finite CNNs approaches that of the corresponding GPs as the channel count increases, with careful tuning SGD-trained CNNs can significantly outperform their corresponding GPs, suggesting advantages from SGD training compared to fully Bayesian parameter estimation.
## Skill Description
This skill is generated from the arXiv paper: Bayesian Deep Convolutional Networks with Many Channels are Gaussian Processes (1810.05148).
## How to Use
[To be filled in by the user or by future automation]
## References
- [arXiv:1810.05148](http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05148v4)
Attribution
Related skills
View all in tools →Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.