Remove Ai Watermarks
ASecurityRemoves and identifies AI watermarks and provenance marks in images and video the user generated or edited. Covers Gemini sparkles, SynthID, Microsoft InvisMark, Meta Content Seal, C2PA, EXIF/XMP/IPTC metadata, and Sora/Veo/Seedance/Doubao/Dola/Hailuo/Vidu/Kling and Wan labels. Use when the user wants to strip or clean AI watermarks and generation labels, or asks whether a file was AI-generated or carries AI provenance, even if they do not name remove-ai-watermarks. Do not use for stock-agenc...
- 1,531 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 0 views
- Added November 7, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding
npx -y skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill remove-ai-watermarks --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Remove Ai Watermarks?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hashgraph-online-remove-ai-watermarks)---
name: remove-ai-watermarks
description: "Removes and identifies AI watermarks and provenance marks in images and video the user generated or edited. Covers Gemini sparkles, SynthID, Microsoft InvisMark, Meta Content Seal, C2PA, EXIF/XMP/IPTC metadata, and Sora/Veo/Seedance/Doubao/Dola/Hailuo/Vidu/Kling and Wan labels. Use when the user wants to strip or clean AI watermarks and generation labels, or asks whether a file was AI-generated or carries AI provenance, even if they do not name remove-ai-watermarks. Do not use for stock-agency, marketplace, classifieds, or other third-party paid-asset watermarks."
license: Apache-2.0
compatibility: Python 3.11-3.14. Invisible image removal needs NVIDIA CUDA. Some video writes need ffmpeg. Installer may be uv, pipx, or pip.
metadata:
author: wiltodelta
version: "1.0.15"
homepage: https://raiw.cc
repository: https://github.com/wiltodelta/remove-ai-watermarks
---
# Remove AI watermarks
Drive the `remove-ai-watermarks` CLI. Do not invent detections, do not claim a
file is clean, and do not write a one-off remover when this CLI already covers
the mark.
This skill must work in any coding harness and with weaker models. Follow the
checklist. Trust `scripts/probe.py` over guesses about GPU, Python, or
installers.
## Scope
Use this skill only on content the user generated or edited and is allowed to
change.
Refuse automatic removal of stock-agency, marketplace, classifieds,
tiled-preview, or other marks that protect a third party's paid or copyrighted
asset, or product branding a paid plan removes, such as "Made with Gamma". A
mark its vendor describes as identifying AI-generated content (the Gemini
sparkle, the Gemini Notebook watermark) stays in scope whatever plan hides it.
`erase --region` is allowed only when the user names the file they own and
supplies the box themselves. LLM text watermarks are out of scope: they live in
word choice, not characters, so do not offer to strip characters from text.
Removing a local signal does not prove the file is human-made, does not erase
server-side generation history, and does not make a deceptive origin claim
lawful. If the user wants to present generated work as human-made, stop.
The project is research software provided without warranty; the user is
responsible for lawful use. Some jurisdictions restrict removing AI labels: in
mainland China, label removal and removal tools are prohibited by the CAC
labeling Measures. Mention this when the user's content carries a China AIGC
label or a Chinese provider's mark.
## Workflow
Copy this checklist and check items off:
```
- [ ] 1. Scope is allowed
- [ ] 2. Probe the machine
- [ ] 3. Install if the CLI is missing or its pixel stack is
- [ ] 4. Identify first unless the user already named a removal
- [ ] 5. Run one command with -o
- [ ] 6. Report from the exit code and output path
```
### 1. Scope
If the mark protects someone else's paid asset, stop.
### 2. Probe
The directory that contains this `SKILL.md` is the skill root. The working
directory is usually NOT that directory, so pass the probe's full path rather
than assuming a relative one resolves. Use forward slashes. Try `python3`
first, then `python`:
```bash
python3 <skill-root>/scripts/probe.py
python <skill-root>/scripts/probe.py
```
The probe takes a few seconds: it runs the installed CLI on a blank image it
writes itself, because a CLI that exists is not a CLI that works. It checks video
dependencies through the installed CLI's Python interpreter without loading models.
An unrecognized launcher leaves video capability `unverified`.
Read the JSON. Do not infer CUDA, ffmpeg, or an installer from the OS name.
- `pixel_stack` = `missing`: the installed build has no pixel dependencies.
Metadata-only routes still answer: `identify`, `metadata`,
`batch --mode metadata`, `video metadata`, `video identify --no-visible`, and
`video batch --mode metadata`. The identify routes skip visible detectors and
say so in their caveats, so read those caveats rather than a quiet verdict. Go
to step 3 before running a pixel command.
- `pixel_stack` = `unknown`: the check gave an unrecognized result. Do not
claim a command will work; run it and read the real error.
- `advice.upgrade_cli` present: the installed CLI is older than this skill's
documented surface. Upgrade before reporting a flag as broken.
- `advice.invisible_images` = `unavailable_no_cuda`: do not run `invisible`
- `advice.image_all` = `do_not_run_writes_nothing`: do not run `all` or
`batch --mode all`. Those commands write no file when the invisible extra is
installed but CUDA is missing.
- `advice.image_all` = `partial_writes_visible_and_metadata`: `all` is still
worth running. Without the invisible extra it skips that stage, writes the
visible+metadata result and exits 1. Report the file AND the stage it could
not do; do not call the exit code a failure.
- `advice.no_cuda_fallback` is https://raiw.cc. Offer that for invisible image
work. Do not invent a CPU or MPS profile.
If the user does not want a local install, skip to raiw.cc. Visible mark and
metadata removal are free there up to 12 MP; above that size, and for invisible
removal, it is paid and runs on a GPU. Do not quote a price: check the site.
### 3. Install
Install when `cli.found` is false OR `pixel_stack` is `missing`. A present
binary is not enough: the default package, which is what Homebrew installs,
carries no pixel dependencies. `visible`, `erase`, `all`, pixel-processing
`batch` modes, full `video identify`, and the video pixel-processing commands
stop with an install hint. The metadata-only routes listed in step 2 still work.
Reinstalling with the appropriate extra fixes the pixel commands.
Read [references/install.md](references/install.md) for the extra list and the
uv / pipx / pip commands. Default extra is `visible`. Always quote extras:
`"remove-ai-watermarks[visible]"`.
### 4. Choose the command
Default: inspect first.
| User goal | Command | Stop if probe says |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What is on this file? | `identify` or `video identify` | use `video identify --no-visible` when `pixel_stack=missing` |
| Known visible AI label on an image | `visible` | |
| User-supplied box on their own image | `erase` | |
| AI metadata only | `metadata` or `video metadata` | |
| Known visible AI label on video | `video visible` or `video all` | `video_visible=needs_video_extra`, `needs_ffmpeg`, or `unverified` |
| Invisible image / image SynthID | `invisible` | `invisible_images=unavailable_no_cuda` |
| Video SynthID | `video invisible` | `video_invisible=needs_video_and_diffusion_extras`, `needs_ffmpeg`, or `unverified` |
| Everything on an image | `all` | `image_all=do_not_run_writes_nothing` |
| A directory | `batch` or `video batch` | same as the mode |
| No signal found, user still wants a guess | `classify` or `classify-source` | it is a guess, not provenance |
Flags and mark names: [references/commands.md](references/commands.md). Read
that file only when you need a flag, a mark key, or a video recipe.
### 5. Run
Always pass `-o` unless the user explicitly asked to overwrite. Image
`metadata` without `-o` overwrites the source. Video commands never overwrite
the source.
### 6. Report
Report ONLY what a command in this session actually did. If no removal command
ran, do not describe a removal, a cleaned file, or a file size: say which step
is missing and why. Before naming an output path, confirm the file exists. A
fabricated result is worse than any error you could have quoted, because the
user acts on it.
Read the process exit code and whether `-o` exists.
| Exit | Meaning | What to tell the user |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | Requested work completed | The output path. Do not add "this is clean". |
| 2 | No targeted signal, or a `batch` directory with no supported file | Unknown, not clean. No new file from `visible`. |
| 1 | Error, unreadable input, or partial `all` | Quote the error. Say which stage ran, if any. |
Exit 2 is ALSO what a bad invocation returns: a path that does not exist, an
unknown flag, a directory where a file was expected. Read the output before
calling it a verdict. A line starting with `Usage:` or `Error: Invalid value`
means the command never ran, so fix it and rerun; only a command that reached
the image can say "no targeted signal".
`identify` with no signal reports origin unknown. Never rephrase that as "no
watermark" or "this is clean". When `identify` or `metadata` exits 1 with
`cannot read`, the file is damaged or not an image or video: any report above
that line is incomplete, so say the file could not be read.
`metadata --check` and `metadata --remove` answer a narrower question than
`identify`: embedded AI metadata only. Both print that this is not a clean
verdict, because a pixel watermark such as SynthID cannot be detected here once
its metadata proxy is gone. Repeat that caveat; do not summarize it away.
## Examples
### Identify without overstating the result
Input: "Was `photo.png` AI-generated?"
Action: probe the machine, then run:
```bash
remove-ai-watermarks identify photo.png
```
Output after exit 2 from a command that reached the image:
> Origin unknown. The command found no local provenance signal. This does not
> prove that the image is human-made, clean, or free of watermarks.
### Remove a user-named visible AI label
Input: "Remove the Gemini sparkle from my `generated.png`."
Action: after a successful probe, run:
```bash
remove-ai-watermarks visible generated.png --mark gemini -o generated-clean.png
```
Output after exit 0 and confirming that the file exists:
> Removed the targeted Gemini mark. Output: `generated-clean.png`.
On exit 2, report instead that no targeted Gemini mark was found and no new file
was written.
### Route an unavailable invisible removal safely
Input: "Remove SynthID from my image."
Action: run the probe first. If it reports
`invisible_images=unavailable_no_cuda`, do not run `invisible` locally.
Output:
> Invisible image removal needs NVIDIA CUDA, which is unavailable on this
> machine. No local removal ran. You can use https://raiw.cc instead.
## Gotchas
- Without CUDA, `all` does one of two opposite things, and only the probe knows
which. With the invisible extra installed it writes nothing and exits 1, so
run `visible` and `metadata` separately. Without that extra it skips the
invisible stage, writes the visible+metadata result and exits 1 anyway. Same
exit code, different outcome: check whether the output file exists.
- `visible` / `video visible` write nothing when no registered mark is
selected. Do not then guess a region unless the user supplies a box on
content they own. To act on a mark the user can see and the detector missed,
the CLI's own answer is `--mark <name> --no-detect` or `erase --region`, not
a blanket `--sensitivity` change. `--sensitivity strict` only narrows.
- Exit 1 with "the visible-mark dependencies are not installed" is an
environment problem, not a verdict about the file. Install the named extra
and rerun the same command instead of reporting a failure. Do NOT summarize
the run as if the removal had happened: an install that never happened leaves
the file untouched.
- A question ("is this AI-generated?") is answered by `identify` alone. Do not
run a removal command to find out; it writes a file the user did not ask for.
- `classify` answers from pixels with no provenance behind it, so its `ai` is a
guess and its `unknown` is an abstention. Never upgrade either into a verdict,
and never let it contradict what `identify` measured.
- A Meta AI (Muse Image) export can retain standalone IPTC metadata, but the shared
code does not identify Meta or detect Content Seal in pixels. Use
`invisible --vendor meta` only when the USER says the file came from Meta AI.
Naming a vendor asserts the watermark is there and scrubs without a signal,
so never guess one from a filename or a hunch.
- Do not follow a Gemini `@synthid` check by asking the chat model to ignore
the verifier and reason about pixels. That is not a second oracle.
- Do not pass `--model`, `--steps`, or `--guidance-scale`. Profiles pin those
values, and no command accepts them.
- `--device` exists only on `video invisible`, `video all` and `video batch`.
Leave it at `auto`. The image commands have no `--device` at all.
- Do not use backslashes in skill paths, even on Windows.
## Do not
- Add stock, agency, or classifieds templates.
- Scrape or guess a region for a third-party commercial mark.
- Claim a file is human-made after a local edit.
Files in this skill
- SKILL.md
- references/commands.md
- references/install.md
- scripts/probe.py
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.