Use when Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Review Animations?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/harmitx7-review-animations-tribunal-kit)
---
name: review-animations
description: "Use when Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned."
version: 5.0.0
last-updated: 2026-09-13
skills:
- emil-design-eng
- 60fps-animation
- accessible-animation
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
scripts-binding:
- .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
- .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
---
# Reviewing Animations
---
## π οΈ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
---
## Operating Posture
You are a senior motion-design reviewer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward **motion that feels right**, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, fires too often, or drops frames is a regression, not a pass. Default to flagging. Approval is earned, not assumed.
The substantive bar comes from Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy (animations.dev). The review _method_ β non-negotiable standards, escalation triggers, a remedial hierarchy, tiered output, and explicit approval criteria β is adapted from aggressive code-quality review.
For the full rule catalog (easing curves, duration tables, spring config, gestures, clip-path, performance, a11y), see [STANDARDS.md](STANDARDS.md). Load it whenever a finding needs a precise value or citation.
## The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards
Every animation in the diff is measured against these. A violation is a finding.
1. **Justified motion.** Every animation must answer "why does this animate?" β spatial consistency, state indication, feedback, explanation, or preventing a jarring change. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a block.
2. **Frequency-appropriate.** Match motion to how often it's seen. Keyboard-initiated and 100+/day actions get **no** animation. Tens/day gets reduced motion. Occasional gets standard. Rare/first-time can have delight.
3. **Responsive easing.** Entering/exiting elements use `ease-out` or a strong custom curve. `ease-in` on UI is a block β it delays the moment the user watches most. Built-in CSS easings are too weak; expect custom cubic-beziers.
4. **Sub-300ms UI.** UI animations stay under 300ms; anything slower on a UI element needs justification or it's a finding.
5. **Origin & physical correctness.** Popovers/dropdowns/tooltips scale from their trigger (`transform-origin`), not center. Never animate from `scale(0)` β start from `scale(0.9β0.97)` + opacity. (Modals are exempt β they stay centered.)
6. **Interruptibility.** Rapidly-triggered or gesture-driven motion (toasts, toggles, drags) must be interruptible β CSS transitions or springs that retarget from current state, not keyframes that restart from zero.
7. **GPU-only properties.** Animate `transform` and `opacity` only. Animating `width`/`height`/`margin`/`padding`/`top`/`left` is a performance finding.
8. **Accessibility.** `prefers-reduced-motion` is honored (gentler, not zero β keep opacity/color, drop movement). Hover animations are gated behind `@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine)`.
9. **Asymmetric enter/exit.** Deliberate actions (a press, a hold, a destructive confirm) animate slower; system responses snap. Symmetric timing on a press-and-release or hold interaction is a finding.
10. **Cohesion.** Motion matches the component's personality and the rest of the product β playful can be appropriate for consumer apps, but not for enterprise dashboards. Verify the motion fits the context.