Use when building, styling, optimizing, and auditing critique components, responsive layouts, design systems, and frontend state.
Scanned 9/29/2026
npx -y skills add Harmitx7/tribunal-kit --skill critique --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Critique?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/harmitx7-critique)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: critique
description: "Use when building, styling, optimizing, and auditing critique components, responsive layouts, design systems, and frontend state."
version: 6.0.0
last-updated: 2026-09-29
skills:
- ui-ux-researcher
- web-design-guidelines
- baseline-ui
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
scripts-binding:
- .agent/scripts/checklist.js
- .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
- .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
---
# Critique — Structured UX & Design Quality Evaluation
## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `critique` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
## Activation Boundaries
- **Activate when:** Use when building, styling, optimizing, and auditing critique components, responsive layouts, design systems, and frontend state.
- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `critique` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
---
## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
---
## The 6 UX Critique Heuristics
```
1. Clarity & Cognitive Load (0-10)
- Is the primary task obvious within 3 seconds?
- Is visual hierarchy clear with distinct primary, secondary, and tertiary elements?
2. Information Architecture & Pacing (0-10)
- Is content logically grouped with appropriate negative space?
- Is reading flow natural (top-left to bottom-right)?
3. Interaction Mechanics & Tactility (0-10)
- Are interactive targets obvious and sized >= 44x44px for touch?
- Is immediate feedback provided for hover, press, focus, and loading states?
4. Visual Elegance & Brand Craft (0-10)
- Are color palettes harmonious and consistent?
- Are typographic scales disciplined and optically balanced?
5. Accessibility & Inclusivity (0-10)
- Does contrast meet WCAG AA standards (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI controls)?
- Is the screen fully navigable via keyboard with visible focus indicators?
6. Edge Case Resilience (0-10)
- Are zero-item empty states, errors, loading skeletons, and truncated text handled?
```
---
## Critique Output Format (Required)
Always output the critique as a structured Markdown evaluation:
```markdown
# 🔍 UX Critique Report
### Overall Quality Score: 8.2 / 10
| Heuristic Domain | Score | Critical Observation |
| ------------------------ | ----- | --------------------------------------------------- |
| Clarity & Cognitive Load | 8/10 | Hero CTA is clear, but subhead copy is verbose. |
| Information Architecture | 9/10 | Excellent grouping and card rhythm. |
| Interaction Mechanics | 7/10 | Missing `:active` press state on primary buttons. |
| Visual Elegance & Craft | 9/10 | Great typography scale and subtle border treatment. |
| Accessibility | 8/10 | Text contrast passes; dropdown needs ARIA labels. |
| Edge Case Resilience | 8/10 | Empty state present; needs loading skeleton. |
### Top 3 Actionable Fixes
1. **[High Priority]**: Add `:active` scale transform (`scale(0.97)`) to interactive buttons.
2. **[Medium Priority]**: Add `text-wrap: balance` to display headings to eliminate orphans.
3. **[Low Priority]**: Truncate secondary card description strings to 2 lines (`line-clamp-2`).
```
## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Uncontrolled Re-render Loop** | Mutating state inside render bodies or omitting hook dependencies | Wrap effects with explicit deps and isolate reactive derivations in useMemo |
| **Accessibility Neglect** | Interactive <div> without role="button", tabIndex, or onKeyDown | Use semantic <button> or provide ARIA role, keyboard handlers, and focus ring |
| **Layout Shift Flash** | Images/dynamic content without aspect-ratio or explicit dimensions | Enforce aspect-ratio or skeleton placeholders to guarantee zero CLS |
## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
**Active Reviewers:** `frontend-reviewer` · `type-safety` · `ui-ux-auditor` · `complexity-reviewer`
**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
```
✅ Are all component props strictly typed with zero implicit "any"?
✅ Are responsive breakpoints, fluid typography, and optical balance verified?
✅ Is accessibility (ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, contrast ratio >= 4.5:1) validated?
✅ Are re-renders minimized and state lifecycles cleanly separated?
✅ Did I verify all imported UI components and icon sets actually exist?
```
### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!