Use when designing, implementing, auditing, and hardening api security auditor server logic, APIs, background jobs, and error boundaries.
Scanned 9/29/2026
npx -y skills add Harmitx7/tribunal-kit --skill api-security-auditor --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Api Security Auditor?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/harmitx7-api-security-auditor)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: api-security-auditor
description: "Use when designing, implementing, auditing, and hardening api security auditor server logic, APIs, background jobs, and error boundaries."
version: 6.0.0
last-updated: 2026-09-29
skills:
- backend-security-expert
- vulnerability-scanner
- schema-reviewer
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
scripts-binding:
- .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
- .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
---
# API Security Auditor — Endpoint Hardening Mastery
## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `api-security-auditor` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
## Activation Boundaries
- **Activate when:** Use when designing, implementing, auditing, and hardening api security auditor server logic, APIs, background jobs, and error boundaries.
- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `api-security-auditor` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
## ⚠️ Tribunal Audit Constraints (MANDATORY)
When performing audits, you MUST adhere to the following rules:
- **Do not speculate.** Only report vulnerabilities you can prove exist in the code.
- **Do not report generic best practices as vulnerabilities.** (e.g., "Consider adding rate limiting" is not a vulnerability unless you are specifically tasked with a rate limiting audit).
- **Provide source evidence.** Quote the exact line of code that causes the issue.
- **Provide exact location where possible.** (File and line number).
- **Separate observation from impact.** Clearly distinguish what the code does from what an attacker could do.
- **Use the approved finding schema.** Output all findings strictly using the Machine-Readable Finding Contract (`id`, `category`, `severity`, `confidence`, `status`, `title`, `location`, `evidence`, `impact`, `remediation`, `validation`).
## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
---
## Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)
IDOR occurs when an application provides direct access to objects based on user-supplied input without authorization checks.
```typescript
// ❌ VULNERABLE: Trusting the requested ID blindly
app.get('/api/receipts/:id', async (req, res) => {
const receipt = await db.receipts.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(receipt); // Attack: Increment ID to view others' receipts
});
// ✅ SAFE: Verifying ownership
app.get('/api/receipts/:id', async (req, res) => {
const receipt = await db.receipts.findById(req.params.id);
if (!receipt) return res.status(404).send();
// Explicit tenancy check
if (receipt.userId !== req.user.id && req.user.role !== 'admin') {
return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Access denied' });
}
res.json(receipt);
});
// ✅ BEST: Using UUIDv4/CUID/NanoID instead of sequential integers
// Attackers cannot guess standard UUIDs, heavily mitigating IDOR risks.
```
---
## Mass Assignment (Overposting)
Occurs when web frameworks automatically bind HTTP request parameters to application models without filtering.
```typescript
// ❌ VULNERABLE: Direct object binding
app.put('/api/users/:id', async (req, res) => {
// Attack: req.body = { name: "Bob", role: "admin", isPaid: true }
await db.users.update({ id: req.params.id }, req.body);
res.send('Updated');
});
// ✅ SAFE: Explicit property selection (DTOs)
app.put('/api/users/:id', async (req, res) => {
// Only extract explicitly allowed fields
const { name, email, bio } = req.body;
const safeData = { name, email, bio };
await db.users.update({ id: req.params.id }, safeData);
res.send('Updated');
});
// ✅ BEST: Validation libraries (Zod, Joi) handling stripping
const UpdateUserSchema = z
.object({
name: z.string().min(2),
email: z.string().email(),
})
.strict(); // `.strict()` throws if "role" or "isPaid" is passed
```
---
## Rate Limiting Architecture
```typescript
// Basic Rate Limiting (Express)
import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit';
import RedisStore from 'rate-limit-redis';
// Global baseline limit
export const globalLimiter = rateLimit({
store: new RedisStore({ client: redisClient }),
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 min
max: 100, // Limit each IP to 100 reqs per window
standardHeaders: true, // Return rate limit info in the `RateLimit-*` headers
});
// Aggressive endpoint-specific limit (Login, Password Reset)
export const authLimiter = rateLimit({
store: new RedisStore({ client: redisClient }),
windowMs: 60 * 60 * 1000, // 1 Hour
max: 5, // 5 login attempts per IP per hour
message: 'Too many login attempts, please try again later',
});
// ❌ HALLUCINATION TRAP: In-memory rate limiting across multiple server pods
// If you use basic memory stores in a load-balanced environment (K8s, ECS),
// an attacker has `limit * num_pods` attempts. Always use a centralized store (Redis).
```
---
## API Key Management
```
Best Practices for issuance and storage:
1. Format: Prefix keys to identify them and allow secret scanners to find them easily.
- Example: `pk_live_8a9b...` (Stripe pattern).
2. Storage: NEVER store plaintext API keys in the DB.
- Hash them using SHA-256 (not bcrypt, because API keys are high entropy/long).
- Only show the user the plaintext key ONCE upon creation.
3. Transport: API keys must only be accepted via Headers, never in Query Params.
- `Authorization: Bearer pk_live_123`
- Query params are logged in server access logs and browser histories.
```
---
## GraphQL Security Vectors
```typescript
// GraphQL introduces unique DoS vectors not found in REST
// 1. Query Depth Limiting (Prevent nested joins crushing the DB)
// User -> Posts -> Comments -> Author -> Posts -> Comments...
import depthLimit from 'graphql-depth-limit';
app.use('/graphql', graphqlHTTP({ validationRules: [depthLimit(5)] }));
// 2. Query Cost Analysis
// Prevent attackers from requesting 100,000 items in a single query
// Implement cursor pagination and enforce `first: 100` limits.
// 3. Introspection Disabled in Production
// Introspection allows attackers to download your entire schema.
const server = new ApolloServer({
schema,
introspection: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production',
});
```
## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Unchecked Payload Cast** | Casting request bodies to TypeScript types without runtime schema validation | Parse request payloads through Zod/Pydantic schemas before business logic |
| **Silent Error Swallowing** | Catching errors with empty catch blocks or logging without rethrowing | Propagate structured errors with status codes and contextual stack traces |
| **Unparameterized Query** | Concatenating user inputs into SQL/Prisma query strings | Always use parameterized bindings or type-safe ORM query builders |
## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
**Active Reviewers:** `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor` · `api-architect` · `resilience-reviewer`
**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
```
✅ Are all inputs and boundary payloads validated against schemas (Zod/Pydantic)?
✅ Are SQL and database queries parameterized with zero string concatenation?
✅ Are error boundaries and timeout/retry policies explicitly declared?
✅ Are authentication and object-level authorization (IDOR/BOLA) checked before business logic?
✅ Did I verify that imported dependencies exist in package manifests?
```
### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!