Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing adr generation agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards.
Scanned 9/29/2026
npx -y skills add Harmitx7/tribunal-kit --skill adr-generation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Adr Generation?
Add the live security badge to your README โ it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/harmitx7-adr-generation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: adr-generation
description: "Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing adr generation agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards."
version: 6.0.0
last-updated: 2026-09-29
skills:
- fabel-protocol
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
scripts-binding:
- .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
- .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
---
# ADR Generation Skill
## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `adr-generation` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
## Activation Boundaries
- **Activate when:** Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing adr generation agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards.
- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `adr-generation` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
## ๐ Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
Use this skill to produce formal Architecture Decision Records.
## ๐ด Hallucination Traps
- โ **Creating ADRs for trivial things** โ โ
Only generate ADRs for decisions that affect boundaries, dependencies, or scale.
- โ **Presenting one option as an "Alternative"** โ โ
Always research and list at least 2 viable alternatives.
- โ **Inventing Consequences** โ โ
Focus on concrete operational or code-level consequences (e.g., "Requires manual DB migrations").
## ๐ Pre-Flight Checklist
1. Have we identified the core problem?
2. Are there at least two viable alternatives?
3. Did we confirm the Minimal-Change Principle?
## ๐ ADR Markdown Template
Use the following strict template when generating an ADR. Save the file in `.agent/architecture/adrs/YYYY-MM-DD-title.md`.
```markdown
# ADR: [Short Descriptive Title]
## Context
[What is the problem we are solving?]
## Decision
[What is the selected approach?]
## Alternatives Considered
1. **[Option A]**: [Why it was rejected]
2. **[Option B]**: [Why it was rejected]
## Trade-offs
[What are the downsides of the chosen Decision?]
## Consequences
[What does this decision force us to do later? What are the operational impacts?]
```
## ๐ก๏ธ Verification-Before-Completion (VBC)
Before concluding, verify that the `system-model.yml` has been updated to reflect this ADR.
## ๐จ Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
## ๐ค LLM-Specific Traps Table
| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
## ๐๏ธ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` ยท `agent-organizer` ยท `logic-reviewer`
**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
### ๐ฌ Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
### โ
Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
```
โ
Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
โ
Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
โ
Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
โ
Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
โ
Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
```
### ๐ Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
- โ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
- โ
**Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!