Keep sessions productive by compressing completed work while preserving key decisions.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add HaoNgo232/agent-bridge-kit --skill context-compression --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Context Compression?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/haongo232-context-compression-agent-bridge-kit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: context-compression
description: Keep sessions productive by compressing completed work while preserving key decisions.
---
# Context Compression — Long Session Management
> Keep sessions productive by compressing completed work while preserving key decisions.
## Overview
Long sessions (30+ turns) cause context degradation — the AI loses track of earlier work, repeats itself, or forgets decisions. Context compression proactively summarizes completed phases so the context window stays focused on active work.
**Token Impact:** Recovers 5,000-15,000 tokens in long sessions by replacing verbose tool outputs with semantic summaries.
---
## When to Compress
| Signal | Action |
|---|---|
| Session has 20+ turns | Consider proactive compression |
| Agent repeats earlier suggestions | Context is saturated — compress now |
| User says "we already discussed this" | Compress immediately |
| Switching to a new phase of work | Compress the completed phase |
| Large tool output (500+ lines) | Micro-compact the output |
---
## Compression Levels
### Level 1: Micro-Compact (Tool Output)
Compress individual tool outputs while retaining semantic content:
```
❌ Before (raw grep output — 200 lines, ~4,000 tokens):
src/auth/jwt.ts:15: import { verify } from 'jsonwebtoken'
src/auth/jwt.ts:23: export function validateToken(token: string) {
src/auth/jwt.ts:24: try {
src/auth/jwt.ts:25: const decoded = verify(token, SECRET)
... (195 more lines)
✅ After (micro-compact — 5 lines, ~100 tokens):
Grep results for "jwt": Found 8 files, 42 matches.
Key files: src/auth/jwt.ts (main JWT logic), src/middleware/auth.ts (middleware),
src/api/login.ts (token creation). Token validation at jwt.ts:23-40.
Error handling at jwt.ts:42-55. Secret loaded from env at jwt.ts:8.
```
### Level 2: Phase Summary
Replace a completed work phase with a summary:
```
❌ Before (full research transcript — ~3,000 tokens):
[turn 1] Read package.json...
[turn 2] Read src/index.ts...
[turn 3] Grep for "auth"...
[turn 4] Found 8 files related to auth...
[turn 5] Read src/auth/jwt.ts...
... (10 more turns of exploration)
✅ After (phase summary — ~200 tokens):
## Research Phase Complete
- Project: Next.js 15 app with JWT auth
- Auth files: 8 files in src/auth/, src/middleware/, src/api/
- Token flow: login → create JWT → store in httpOnly cookie → validate in middleware
- Bug location: src/auth/jwt.ts:45 — expiry check uses `<` instead of `<=`
- Decision: Fix the comparison operator, add edge case test
```
### Level 3: Session Checkpoint
Full session summary for long-running work:
```markdown
## Session Checkpoint (Turn 35)
### Completed
- [x] Researched auth system (8 files, JWT flow mapped)
- [x] Fixed token expiry bug in jwt.ts:45
- [x] Added edge case test in jwt.test.ts
- [x] Verified: all 42 tests passing
### In Progress
- [ ] Update API documentation
- [ ] Review related middleware
### Key Decisions
1. Keep httpOnly cookies (not localStorage) for token storage
2. Use `<=` for expiry check to include exact-moment expiry
3. Add 5-minute grace period for clock skew
### Files Modified
- src/auth/jwt.ts (line 45: comparison fix)
- tests/auth/jwt.test.ts (added 3 edge case tests)
```
---
## Compression Protocol
### Step 1: Identify Completed Phases
```
What work is DONE and won't be revisited?
→ Research findings already synthesized
→ Implementation already verified
→ Decisions already made and applied
```
### Step 2: Extract Key Information
```
From the completed phase, preserve:
✅ Decisions made and WHY
✅ File paths and line numbers of changes
✅ Key findings that inform ongoing work
✅ Error messages or test results (summarized)
Discard:
❌ Step-by-step tool invocation details
❌ Full file contents that were read
❌ Exploratory dead-ends that didn't lead anywhere
❌ Verbose error stack traces (keep the message only)
```
### Step 3: Write Summary
```
Use the Phase Summary format above.
Keep to 100-300 tokens per completed phase.
Include enough detail to resume work without re-reading.
```
---
## Best Practices
1. **Compress phases, not facts** — Individual decisions should stay, full transcripts should go
2. **Preserve "why" over "what"** — Why a decision was made matters more than the exact commands run
3. **Never auto-compress** — Always tell the user "I'm summarizing the completed research phase to keep context focused"
4. **Keep file references** — Always preserve file paths and line numbers in summaries
5. **Checkpoint on phase transitions** — Natural compression point when switching from research to implementation
---
*Generated by [Agent Bridge](https://github.com/HaoNgo232/agent-bridge)*
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!