Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Play Policy Insights

ASecurity

Automated auditor designed to verify Android applications against Google Play Policy domains. It cross-references static code analysis with Play Store declarations to generate deterministic compliance reports, identifying undeclared data collection, architectural risks, and missing disclosures across Permissions and APIs Hygiene, User Account and Identity, and Data Safety and Privacy domains.

8 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/29/2026
ai-agentspythongoapici/cd

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 14 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 9/29/2026

$npx -y skills add hamzabellouch/agent-skills --skill play-policy-insights --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Play Policy Insights?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Play Policy Insights
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/hamzabellouch-play-policy-insights/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hamzabellouch-play-policy-insights)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: play-policy-insights
description: Automated auditor designed to verify Android applications against Google Play Policy domains. It cross-references static code analysis with Play Store declarations to generate deterministic compliance reports, identifying undeclared data collection, architectural risks, and missing disclosures across Permissions and APIs Hygiene, User Account and Identity, and Data Safety and Privacy domains.
license: Complete terms in LICENSE.txt
metadata:
  author: Google LLC
  last-updated: '2026-07-13'
  keywords:
  - account deletion
  - accessibility api
  - all files access
  - audio recording
  - audit
  - compliance
  - contacts access
  - data disclosure
  - data safety
  - data safety label
  - data transmission
  - demo credentials
  - exact alarm
  - foreground services
  - location access
  - login credentials
  - manifest hygiene
  - package visibility
  - permissions hygiene
  - photo and video access
  - photopicker
  - play policy
  - pre-submission audit
  - privacy policy
  - prominent disclosure
  - restricted permissions
  - scoped storage
  - sms and call log
  - static analysis
  - target sdk
  - user consent
---

# Play Policy Insights: data safety, login credentials, and restricted permissions

You must audit Android apps for three specific policy domains. You must check
data safety, demo login credentials, and restricted permissions.

## Path Resolution

*   **repo_root**: Absolute path to the directory containing this `SKILL.md`.
*   **app_dir**:: Absolute path to the directory containing app's code.
*   **temp_dir**: Absolute path to the scratch directory at the workspace root.
    It is located at `.scratch/play_policy_insights_<uuid>`. **Containment
    Mandate**: You must confine all file system writes, intermediate artifacts,
    and logs strictly to this directory. This ensures the skill remains portable
    and safe across diverse execution environments, including local harnesses
    and CI/CD pipelines, by avoiding reliance on system-level temporary paths or
    user home directories.

## Critical mandates

-   **Execution Mode Awareness** Before starting Phase 2, evaluate if your
    execution environment provides a tool to spawn or delegate tasks to
    general-purpose sub-agents (e.g., tools often named `invoke_agent`,
    `delegate_task`, or `spawn_worker`, using generic agent profiles like
    'generalist' or 'coding_agent').

-   If **YES**, you MUST use **Mode A (Delegation)**.

-   If **NO**, use **Mode B (Sequential Self-Execution)**. You must read the
    prompt files intended for the subagents, follow their instructions, and
    write the expected output files to disk.

-   **Sub-agents orchestration:**

    -   If you use "Mode A (Delegation)", wait for "SUCCESS" confirmation from
        sub-agents to know when they are done.

    -   **Idempotency & Timeout Safeguard**: If a sub-agent fails or times out,
        you MUST verify the presence and integrity of its target output file
        (e.g., `<temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json`) before retrying. If the
        file exists and contains valid JSON, treat the execution as **SUCCESS**
        and proceed. Otherwise, retry up to three times.

-   **Fail-fast mandate:** The automated audit in Phase 1 is the source of
    truth. If `orchestrator.py` fails, you must stop immediately with an
    explanation of failure. Do not use manual auditing as a fallback.

## The two-phase protocol

### Phase 1: Fact gathering and triage

1.  **Initialize and triage**:
    -   Run `python3 <repo_root>/scripts/orchestrator.py init <app_dir>`.
    -   This will create the scratch environment, perform static analysis, map
        the codebase, identify audit goals, and produce prompts for subagents
        for each audit goal and prompts for designated critic and aggregator
        subagents.
    -   You must wait (up to 5 minutes) for the script to finish.
2.  **Capture environment**: Note values of the `temp_dir`, and
    `activated_goals` from the JSON output. You will need them in Phase 2.
3.  **Evaluate goals**: If `activated_goals` is empty, skip to step 3 of Phase 2
    (Aggregation). Otherwise, proceed to step 1 of Phase 2 (Detailed analysis).

### Phase 2: Goal-oriented audit

Determine your execution capabilities and proceed with either Mode A OR Mode B.

#### Mode A: Orchestrator WITH Delegation Capabilities (Parallel)

1.  **Detailed analysis**: For each goal in `activated_goals` (e.g.,
    `permissions_and_apis`, `data_safety_part_1`, `data_safety_part_2`),
    delegate to a sub-agent. **Concurrency Limit:** You must not spawn more than
    3 sub-agents simultaneously. Spawn the first batch of up to 3, wait for
    their completions, and then spawn the next batch. Repeat until all goals are
    complete. Pass the prompt: `"Read your instructions from
    <temp_dir>/prompt_worker_<goal_name>.md and execute. MANDATORY: You must
    use your file-writing capabilities to save your final JSON findings directly
    to the file system at <temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json. You are strictly
    forbidden from outputting the JSON in your chat response. To minimize
    context usage, your final response must be exactly 'SUCCESS' and nothing
    else."` **Validate**: Confirm every
    `<temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json` exists and contains valid JSON. If a
    sub-agent fails or times out, but the valid JSON output file is already
    present on disk, do NOT retry; proceed normally. Only retry the
    corresponding worker (up to three times) if the file is missing or invalid.
2.  **Aggregate Findings**: Execute the python aggregation command:
   `python3 <repo_root>/scripts/orchestrator.py aggregate <temp_dir>`. This
   produces `aggregated_findings.json` and returns a JSON object containing
   `critic_chunks` representing the number of chunks to verify (e.g.,
   `{"temp_dir": "...", "critic_chunks": 2}`).
3.  **Parallel Critic review**: For each chunk index `i` from 1 to
   `critic_chunks`, delegate to a sub-agent. **Concurrency Limit:** You must not
   spawn more than 3 critic sub-agents simultaneously. Batch them in groups of 3
   as above. Pass the prompt:
   `"Read your instructions from <temp_dir>/prompt_critic_<i>.md and execute. MANDATORY: You must use your file-writing capabilities to save your final JSON findings directly to the file system at <temp_dir>/critic_output_<i>.json. You are strictly forbidden from outputting the JSON in your chat response. To minimize context usage, your final response must be exactly 'SUCCESS' and nothing else."`
   **Validate**: Confirm each `<temp_dir>/critic_output_<i>.json` exists and
   contains valid JSON before proceeding. If it failed or timed out, but the
   valid JSON file is present, proceed normally. Otherwise, retry that specific
   critic chunk.
4.  **Proceed to Finalization** (Step 4 below)

#### Mode B: Orchestrator WITHOUT Delegation Capabilities (Sequential)

1.  **Detailed Analysis**: For each goal in `activated_goals`, sequentially:
    -   Read the contents of `<temp_dir>/prompt_worker_<goal_name>.md`.
    -   Execute the instructions contained within that file yourself.
    -   **CRITICAL**: You MUST format your findings exactly as requested in the
        prompt and save them to `<temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json`. **Do not**
        summarize findings in your thoughts or chat; move to the next task.
    -   **Validate**: Confirm `<temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json` exists before
        moving to the next goal.
2.  **Aggregate Findings**: Execute the python aggregation command:
   `python3 <repo_root>/scripts/orchestrator.py --aggregate <temp_dir>`.
   This produces `aggregated_findings.json` and returns a JSON object containing
   `critic_chunks` representing the number of chunks to verify.
3.  **Sequential Critic review**: For each chunk index `i` from 1 to
   `critic_chunks`, sequentially:
    -   Read the contents of `<temp_dir>/prompt_critic_<i>.md`.
    -   Execute the steps yourself and save your findings to
      `<temp_dir>/critic_output_<i>.json`.
    -   **Validate**: Confirm `<temp_dir>/critic_output_<i>.json` exists before
      moving to the next chunk.
4.  **Proceed to Finalization** (Step 4 below)

#### Finalization (Both Modes)

4.  **Present findings**: Run `python3 <repo_root>/scripts/generate_report.py <temp_dir>`. 
    It will produce `<temp_dir>/compliance_report.md`. Present this output file to user.
5.  **STOP**: The audit is complete. Await further instructions.

Attribution

hamzabellouchhamzabellouch
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from hamzabellouch →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698621 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →