Enforces TDD (Red-Green-Refactor) for Rust development. Auto-triggers on implementation, testing, refactoring, and bug fixing tasks. Provides Rust-idiomatic testing patterns with anyhow/thiserror, cfg(test), and Arrange-Act-Assert workflow.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Hacck3y/ptk --skill ptk-tdd --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ptk Tdd?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hacck3y-ptk-tdd)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ptk-tdd
description: >
Enforces TDD (Red-Green-Refactor) for Rust development. Auto-triggers on
implementation, testing, refactoring, and bug fixing tasks. Provides
Rust-idiomatic testing patterns with anyhow/thiserror, cfg(test), and
Arrange-Act-Assert workflow.
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- Bash
effort: medium
tags: [tdd, testing, rust, red-green-refactor, ptk]
---
# Rust TDD Workflow
## Three Laws of TDD
1. Do NOT write production code without a failing test
2. Write only enough test to fail (including compilation failure)
3. Write only enough production code to pass the failing test
Cycle: **RED** (test fails) -> **GREEN** (minimum to pass) -> **REFACTOR** (cleanup, cargo test)
## Red-Green-Refactor Steps
```
1. Write test in #[cfg(test)] mod tests of the SAME file
2. cargo test MODULE::tests::test_name -- must FAIL (red)
3. Implement the minimum in the function
4. cargo test MODULE::tests::test_name -- must PASS (green)
5. Refactor if needed, re-run cargo test (still green)
6. cargo fmt && cargo clippy --all-targets && cargo test (final gate)
```
Never skip step 2. If the test passes immediately, it tests nothing.
## Idiomatic Rust Test Patterns
| Pattern | Usage | When |
|---------|-------|------|
| Arrange-Act-Assert | Base structure for every test | Always |
| `assert_eq!` / `assert!` | Direct comparison / booleans | Deterministic values |
| `assert!(result.is_err())` | Error path testing | Invalid inputs |
| `Result<()>` return type | Tests with `?` operator | Fallible functions |
| `#[should_panic]` | Expected panic | Invariants, preconditions |
| `tempfile::NamedTempFile` | File/I/O tests | Filesystem-dependent code |
## Patterns by Code Type
| Code Type | Test Pattern | Example |
|-----------|-------------|---------|
| Pure function (str -> str) | Input literal -> assert output | `assert_eq!(truncate("hello", 3), "...")` |
| Parsing/filtering | Raw string -> filter -> contains/not-contains | `assert!(filter(raw).contains("expected"))` |
| Validation/security | Boundary inputs -> assert bool | `assert!(!is_valid("../etc/passwd"))` |
| Error handling | Bad input -> `is_err()` | `assert!(parse("garbage").is_err())` |
| Struct/enum roundtrip | Construct -> serialize -> deserialize -> eq | `assert_eq!(from_str(to_str(x)), x)` |
## Naming Convention
```
test_{function}_{scenario}
test_{function}_{input_type}
```
Examples: `test_truncate_edge_case`, `test_parse_invalid_input`, `test_filter_empty_string`
## When NOT to Use Pure TDD
- Functions calling `Command::new()` -> test the parser, not the execution
- `std::process::exit()` -> refactor to `Result` first, then test the Result
- Direct I/O (SQLite, network) -> use tempfile/mock or test the pure logic separately
- Main/CLI wiring -> covered by integration/smoke tests
## Pre-Commit Gate
```bash
cargo fmt --all --check
cargo clippy --all-targets
cargo test
```
All 3 must pass. No exceptions. No `#[allow(...)]` without documented justification.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!