Skip to content
Back to skills

Kernel Security Audit

ASecurity

Use when a Linux kernel PR diff handles untrusted input (copy_from_user, get_user, ioctl args, netlink attrs, network or firmware data), security lens (Sashiko stage 6): OOB access, integer overflow, TOCTOU, info leaks to userspace, privilege escalation in the CHANGED code only. Part of the linux-kernel-review suite.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 5, 2026
ai-agentsrustgogitsecurity

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 5, 2026

npx -y skills add gvago/unofficial-qodo-review-skills --skill kernel-security-audit --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Kernel Security Audit?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Kernel Security Audit
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/gvago-kernel-security-audit/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gvago-kernel-security-audit)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: kernel-security-audit
description: "Use when a Linux kernel PR diff handles untrusted input (copy_from_user, get_user, ioctl args, netlink attrs, network or firmware data), security lens (Sashiko stage 6): OOB access, integer overflow, TOCTOU, info leaks to userspace, privilege escalation in the CHANGED code only. Part of the linux-kernel-review suite."
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
  author: Sashiko contributors / Chris Mason
  adapted_by: gvago
  source: https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko (Apache-2.0), references from masoncl/review-prompts (MIT)
  variant: review
  version: 1.0.0
---

# kernel-security-audit

Lens for security review of a kernel patch (Sashiko stage 6). Red Team
posture: scrutinize every point where untrusted input reaches sensitive
code.

## How to apply

- Map the data boundaries first: what enters from userspace
  (copy_from_user, get_user, ioctl args, netlink attrs, syscall params),
  from the network, or from untrusted hardware/firmware.
- Follow each untrusted value to every use. A missing or weak validation
  between entry and use is the finding.
- Reachability by untrusted, remote, or unprivileged input RAISES severity;
  believed unreachability never lowers it (see kernel-review-discipline).

## Rule index

- S1. Buffer overflows and out-of-bounds reads/writes: index arithmetic on
  attacker-influenced values, missing or off-by-one bounds checks,
  memcpy/strcpy with unchecked lengths.
- S2. Integer overflow/underflow feeding allocation sizes, offsets, or loop
  bounds; truncating casts that bypass checks done at the wider width.
- S3. TOCTOU races: validation and use in separate windows where the value
  can change (re-fetch from userspace, racing state change).
- S4. Information leaks to userspace: copy_to_user of structs with
  uninitialized fields or padding holes; error paths leaking kernel
  pointers or heap content.
- S5. Privilege escalation vectors: capability checks missing or performed
  on the wrong credential; state changes ordered so an unprivileged step
  gains a privileged effect.

## Mapping a finding to the contract

- action_level: action_required for any proven S1-S5 with an untrusted
  path; remediation_recommended when the input source is privileged but the
  pattern is still unsafe.
- category: Security.
- evidence: entry point of the untrusted value, the propagation chain, the
  unsafe use, functions and lines. State the attacker precondition.

## What NOT to flag

- Bounds checks on values provable to originate only from trusted kernel
  state.
- Constructs that look unsafe but sit behind capability checks you can
  cite, cite them and dismiss instead.
- Hardening suggestions (e.g. "use strscpy everywhere") without a proven
  vulnerable path.

## Sourcing

Stage text adapted from Sashiko (Apache-2.0).

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.