Skip to content
Back to skills

Test Driven Development

ASecurity

Use when implementing new features or fixing bugs. Write tests before implementation following Red-Green-Refactor. Covers JUnit5, MockK, Compose test rules, and the Prove-It pattern for bugs.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 4, 2026
ai-agentsgojavakotlintestingdebuggingrefactoringapidatabase

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 4, 2026

npx -y skills add GuillemRoca/agent-skills-android --skill test-driven-development --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Test Driven Development?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Test Driven Development
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/guillemroca-test-driven-development/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/guillemroca-test-driven-development)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: test-driven-development
description: >-
  Use when implementing new features or fixing bugs. Write tests before
  implementation following Red-Green-Refactor. Covers JUnit5, MockK,
  Compose test rules, and the Prove-It pattern for bugs.
---

# Test-Driven Development

## Overview

Write tests **before** implementation. The Red-Green-Refactor cycle — write a failing test (RED), write minimal code to pass (GREEN), improve the code without changing behavior (REFACTOR) — produces code that is correct by construction and has comprehensive test coverage from the start.

## When to Use

- Implementing any new feature or behavior
- Fixing any bug (use the Prove-It pattern)
- Adding new business logic to ViewModels, use cases, or repositories
- Before refactoring (establish a test safety net first)

**Skip when:** Purely cosmetic UI changes with no behavioral logic.

## Core Process

### Red-Green-Refactor Cycle

#### RED: Write a Failing Test

1. **Write the test first** — describe what the code should do:

```kotlin
class TaskListViewModelTest {
    private val repository = mockk<TaskRepository>()
    private lateinit var viewModel: TaskListViewModel

    @Test
    fun `initial state is Loading`() {
        every { repository.getTasks() } returns flowOf(emptyList())

        viewModel = TaskListViewModel(GetTasksUseCase(repository))

        assertEquals(TaskListUiState.Loading, viewModel.uiState.value)
    }

    @Test
    fun `emits Success with tasks when repository returns data`() = runTest {
        val tasks = listOf(Task("1", "Buy groceries", false))
        every { repository.getTasks() } returns flowOf(tasks)

        viewModel = TaskListViewModel(GetTasksUseCase(repository))
        advanceUntilIdle()

        assertEquals(TaskListUiState.Success(tasks), viewModel.uiState.value)
    }

    @Test
    fun `emits Error when repository throws`() = runTest {
        every { repository.getTasks() } returns flow { throw IOException("Network error") }

        viewModel = TaskListViewModel(GetTasksUseCase(repository))
        advanceUntilIdle()

        val state = viewModel.uiState.value
        assertIs<TaskListUiState.Error>(state)
        assertEquals("Network error", state.message)
    }
}
```

2. **Run the test — it must fail** (`./gradlew test`)
   - If it passes immediately, the test doesn't test what you think

#### GREEN: Write Minimal Code to Pass

3. **Implement just enough to make the test pass:**

```kotlin
@HiltViewModel
class TaskListViewModel @Inject constructor(
    getTasks: GetTasksUseCase,
) : ViewModel() {

    val uiState: StateFlow<TaskListUiState> = getTasks()
        .map<List<Task>, TaskListUiState> { TaskListUiState.Success(it) }
        .catch { emit(TaskListUiState.Error(it.message ?: "Unknown error")) }
        .stateIn(viewModelScope, SharingStarted.WhileSubscribed(5_000), TaskListUiState.Loading)
}
```

4. **Run the test — it must pass**
5. **Don't add code "you'll need later"** — only what the test demands

#### REFACTOR: Improve Without Changing Behavior

6. **Clean up while tests stay green:**
   - Extract common patterns
   - Improve naming
   - Reduce duplication
   - Run tests after every change

### The Prove-It Pattern (Bug Fixes)

7. **For every bug, prove it exists before fixing:**

```kotlin
// Step 1: Write a test that demonstrates the bug
@Test
fun `completed tasks should not appear in active filter`() {
    val tasks = listOf(
        Task("1", "Active task", completed = false),
        Task("2", "Done task", completed = true),
    )
    every { repository.getTasks() } returns flowOf(tasks)

    viewModel = TaskListViewModel(GetTasksUseCase(repository))
    viewModel.setFilter(TaskFilter.ACTIVE)
    advanceUntilIdle()

    val state = viewModel.uiState.value as TaskListUiState.Success
    assertEquals(1, state.tasks.size)
    assertEquals("Active task", state.tasks[0].title)
}

// Step 2: Run it — confirm it FAILS (proves the bug exists)
// Step 3: Fix the code
// Step 4: Run it — confirm it PASSES (proves the fix works)
// Step 5: Run full suite — no regressions
```

### Test Pyramid

```
    /‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾\
   / UI Tests   \        ~5%  — Compose rules, Espresso, Maestro flows
  / (device)     \             see: android-device-testing, android-e2e-verification
 /‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾\
/ Integration Tests \     ~15% — Room in-memory DB, MockWebServer,
| (local/device)    |           Robolectric
|‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾|
|    Unit Tests       |   ~80% — JUnit5 + MockK
|  (fast, local)      |          ViewModels, UseCases, Repositories
 ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
```

### Testing Patterns by Layer

8. **ViewModel tests:**

```kotlin
@OptIn(ExperimentalCoroutinesApi::class)
class ViewModelTest {
    @get:Rule
    val mainDispatcherRule = MainDispatcherRule() // Sets Dispatchers.Main to TestDispatcher

    @Test
    fun `action updates state correctly`() = runTest {
        // Arrange
        val viewModel = createViewModel()

        // Act
        viewModel.onEvent(TaskListEvent.ToggleTask("1"))
        advanceUntilIdle()

        // Assert
        val state = viewModel.uiState.value
        // ...assertions...
    }
}
```

9. **Repository tests (integration):**

```kotlin
class TaskRepositoryTest {
    private val dao = mockk<TaskDao>()
    private val api = mockk<TaskApi>()
    private val mapper = TaskMapper()
    private val repository = TaskRepositoryImpl(dao, api, mapper)

    @Test
    fun `syncTasks fetches from API and saves to database`() = runTest {
        val apiTasks = listOf(TaskResponse("1", "Test"))
        coEvery { api.getTasks() } returns apiTasks
        coEvery { dao.upsertAll(any()) } just Runs

        repository.syncTasks()

        coVerify { dao.upsertAll(match { it.size == 1 && it[0].id == "1" }) }
    }
}
```

10. **Room DAO tests:**

```kotlin
@RunWith(AndroidJUnit4::class)
class TaskDaoTest {
    private lateinit var db: AppDatabase
    private lateinit var dao: TaskDao

    @Before
    fun setup() {
        db = Room.inMemoryDatabaseBuilder(
            ApplicationProvider.getApplicationContext(),
            AppDatabase::class.java,
        ).build()
        dao = db.taskDao()
    }

    @After
    fun teardown() { db.close() }

    @Test
    fun upsert_and_observe_returns_task() = runTest {
        val task = TaskEntity("1", "Test", null, false)
        dao.upsert(task)

        val result = dao.observeAll().first()
        assertEquals(1, result.size)
        assertEquals("Test", result[0].title)
    }
}
```

## Best Practices

- **State over interactions** — assert on outcomes, not method calls
- **DAMP over DRY** — each test should be self-contained and readable
- **Prefer real > fakes > stubs > mocks** — mock only at system boundaries
- **Descriptive names** — test names read like behavior specifications
- **Use `runTest`** — for coroutine testing with `TestDispatcher`
- **Use `advanceUntilIdle()`** — not `delay()` or `Thread.sleep()`

## Common Rationalizations

| Shortcut | Why It Fails |
|----------|-------------|
| "I'll write tests after the code works" | You won't. And tests written after are weaker — they verify what you built, not what you intended. |
| "TDD is slow" | TDD prevents debugging. Net time is less. |
| "This is too simple to test" | Simple code becomes complex code. Tests catch the transition. |
| "Mocking is too complex for this" | If it's hard to mock, the design has too many dependencies. TDD surfaces this. |
| "The test passed on the first try, so it's good" | A test that never failed may not test what you think. Make it fail first. |

## Red Flags

- Code written before tests
- Tests that pass immediately (never saw RED)
- `Thread.sleep` or hardcoded delays in tests
- Tests that depend on execution order
- Mocking internal classes (mock boundaries only)
- No tests for error/edge cases
- `@Ignore` or `@Disabled` tests without issue references

## Verification

- [ ] Tests written BEFORE implementation (Red-Green-Refactor)
- [ ] Every test seen failing before passing
- [ ] Bug fixes use the Prove-It pattern
- [ ] `./gradlew test` passes (all unit tests)
- [ ] Test names describe behavior, not implementation
- [ ] No `Thread.sleep` in tests (use `advanceUntilIdle`)
- [ ] Test pyramid proportions reasonable (~80/15/5)
- [ ] Edge cases and error paths covered

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…