Takes a loose idea and transforms it into a structured, actionable spec ready for implementation. Use when the user passes an idea, feature request, or problem description that needs scoping before building.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add griffinwork40/agent-afk --skill spec --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Spec?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/griffinwork40-spec)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: spec
description: "Takes a loose idea and transforms it into a structured, actionable spec ready for implementation. Use when the user passes an idea, feature request, or problem description that needs scoping before building."
argument-hint: "<idea or feature request>"
context: fork
---
## Triage: bugs route to /diagnose
Before speccing, detect bug-shaped inputs: crashes, error stacks, regression reports ("worked yesterday", "used to work"), platform-specific failures ("broken on X", "doesn't work when…"), or user-report framing that implies root-cause-first (not design-first). If detected, stop and redirect: *"This is a debugging task, not a spec task. Route to /diagnose instead — it will isolate the root cause, then /spec can scope the fix."* Do not emit a spec.
---
Dispatch two sub-agents in parallel. One researches the web for prior art, comparable approaches, and patterns relevant to $ARGUMENT. The other inspects the local working directory for conventions, existing artifacts, and integration points relevant to the domain. When both return, synthesize a concise spec using the domain-appropriate schema below. Present to the user for confirmation before proceeding.
**Output schema by domain:**
| Domain | Spec fields |
|--------|-------------|
| `software` | problem, goals, non-goals, approach, key decisions, interface, file plan, test plan, open questions |
| `research` | problem, hypothesis, methodology, prior art positioning, expected results, publication plan, open questions |
| `design` | problem, user needs, constraints, solution space, prototype plan, success metrics, open questions |
| `business` | opportunity, risk analysis, competitive landscape, go/no-go criteria, resource plan, open questions |
| *(other)* | problem, goals, non-goals, approach, key decisions, deliverables, validation plan, open questions |
When domain is unspecified, infer from $ARGUMENT and the working directory. If ambiguous, use the generic *(other)* schema.
## Epistemic confidence
Include an **Epistemic confidence** section at the end of every spec: summarize coverage gaps from research, flag claims that will be hard to verify, and note where human judgment will be needed.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!