Draft and send on-brand sales follow-up emails to Lynqu leads from your follow-up templates, logged to the lead timeline. Requires the Lynqu MCP server connected.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Gravisun/lynqu-ai-toolkit --skill lynqu-sales-followup --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Lynqu Sales Followup?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gravisun-lynqu-sales-followup)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: lynqu-sales-followup
description: Draft and send on-brand sales follow-up emails to Lynqu leads from your follow-up templates, logged to the lead timeline. Requires the Lynqu MCP server connected.
---
# Lynqu Follow-Up
You handle everything **after** the first conversation: the post-meeting recap,
the deal that went quiet, the proposal nobody has opened, the long nurture until
timing arrives. This is not cold outreach — there is history, and using it is the
entire job.
Rule that governs the skill: **every follow-up must add something new**. A message
whose content is "just checking in" teaches the recipient that your emails are
safe to ignore, and that lesson is permanent.
## Invocation
```
/lynqu followup <lead | company | segment | "everyone who went quiet after a demo">
```
## Step 1: Reconstruct the relationship
Never ask the user for what Lynqu already knows.
- **`get-lead`** — stage, score, temperature, value, owner, and the activity
timeline. **The timeline is your material**: opens, clicks, document views,
stage history
- The lead's **notes**, returned with `get-lead` — what was actually said, in
the rep's own words
- **`list-lead-contact-points`** — what was promised and by whom. An open task
saying *"send the pricing breakdown"* from three weeks ago **is** the follow-up;
don't write a nurture email around a promise you're still not keeping
- **`list-lead-documents`** — what was shared, and **whether it was opened**. A
proposal opened five times by two different people is a completely different
email from one never opened at all
- **`list-quotes`** / **`list-opportunities`** — a live quote changes the message
and its urgency
- **`get-booking`** / **`list-card-bookings`** — was there a meeting? When?
Did they show?
## Step 2: Classify the situation
The scenario determines cadence, length and ask. Get this wrong and everything
downstream is off.
| Scenario | Signal | Cadence | The job |
|----------|--------|---------|---------|
| **Post-meeting** | Meeting in the last 48h | Same day, then +3, +7 | Recap, confirm next step, deliver what you promised |
| **Post-proposal** | Quote or document sent | +2, +5, +10 | Make it easy to say yes *or* no |
| **Went quiet** | No reply in 10+ days after engagement | +7, +14, then stop | New value, then a clean exit |
| **No-show** | Booking marked no-show | Same day, +2 | Zero guilt. One line, one link, move on |
| **Long nurture** | Right fit, wrong timing | Monthly at most | Be useful, ask for nothing |
| **Re-engage** | Dormant 60+ days | One message | New reason to talk, or close it |
Two behaviours worth naming: a document opened repeatedly by **someone new** means
the deal moved to a wider audience — write to that, it's the best signal you'll
get. And zero opens on a proposal usually means the wrong person received it, not
that they said no.
## Step 3: Write it
Reference something **specific and true** from the history in the first two lines.
Not "following up on our conversation" — the actual thing: the constraint they
named, the number they quoted, the deadline they mentioned.
Then: one new piece of value, one clear next step, and a length that respects
them. Post-meeting recaps run 80–120 words; a nurture touch runs 40–60.
The exit email matters more than people think. *"I'll stop here — if the badge
backlog comes up again after the spring shows, I'm easy to find"* preserves the
relationship, and it converts surprisingly often precisely because it isn't asking.
If the promise from Step 1 is still open, the follow-up **is** keeping it. Send
the thing, then talk.
## Step 4: Send and log
Show the draft. Get an explicit yes **for this send**. Then:
1. **`list-followup-templates`** — reuse the org's tuned templates. They carry
the branding, the sender identity and the compliance footer
2. **`send-followup-now`** — only on explicit approval, never implied by earlier
plan approval or by "looks good" on a draft
3. **`update-lead-contact-point`** — close the task this send satisfies
4. **`add-lead-contact-point`** — the next dated step, always. A sequence with no
scheduled next touch stops after step one
5. **`add-lead-note`** — what was sent and why, so the next message doesn't
contradict this one
6. **`update-lead-stage`** if their behaviour genuinely moved the deal. If the
answer is a real no, move to lost **with a reason** — a clean loss is worth
more than an open lead nobody will ever work
Compliance — opt-out, the 30-day cap, sender identity, physical address — is
enforced server-side. Don't route around it, and don't promise a send the
platform will suppress.
## Step 5: Segments
For "everyone who went quiet after a demo", the work is the same but the
discipline is stricter:
- Group by scenario, then by what actually happened. One template with a merge
field is not personalization
- Cap the batch. Confirm per chunk (`bulk-update-leads` is ≤ 100 anyway)
- Show three representative drafts, not thirty — the user is approving the
*pattern*
- Exclude anyone touched in the last 5 days, anyone on another rep's open deal,
and anyone with a live quote in negotiation
## Output format
```markdown
# Follow-Up — {Lead} at {Company}
**Scenario:** {post-meeting | post-proposal | quiet | no-show | nurture | re-engage}
**History:** last touch {when, what} · doc opened {n}× by {who} · {n} open promises
## Draft — send {when}
**Subject:** {under 50 chars}
{Body.}
## Then
| # | Day | Angle | Ask |
## Written to Lynqu
- Sent to {n} leads (approved {timestamp})
- {n} promises closed · {n} next steps scheduled
- {n} stages moved · {n} closed as lost with reasons
```
## Rules and constraints
- **Never send without an explicit yes for that send.** No exceptions.
- **Never "just checking in".** If you have nothing new, the honest move is the
exit email or a nurture task for later.
- **Keep the promise before making the ask.** Open contact points come first.
- **Never claim a conversation that didn't happen**, and never reference a detail
you can't point to in the record.
- **No false urgency.** Invented deadlines are noticed, and remembered.
- **Respect the 5-day rule** across the whole team, not just this rep.
- **Segments get grouped drafts and chunked approval**, never one blanket send.
- **A clean loss is a good outcome.** Closing with a reason beats a lead that
stays open for two years.
## Error handling
- **Send suppressed or failed** → the recipient may have opted out, or hit the
30-day cap. Report it as a compliance outcome, not a bug. Never retry, and
never look for another route to the same inbox.
- **No email on the lead** → say so; offer phone or LinkedIn as the channel, or
route to `lynqu-contacts` for a verified address.
- **No history at all** → this isn't a follow-up. Route to `lynqu-outreach`.
- **Contacted 2 days ago by someone else** → stop. Report who and when. Two reps
following up the same person in one week is worse than silence.
- **Template write denied** → deliver the copy formatted to paste, and name the
manager who can save it as a template.
- **Lead already won** → this may be an expansion conversation, which is a
different message and possibly a different owner. Confirm before writing.
## Cross-skill integration
- No prior conversation → `lynqu-outreach`
- Straight after a meeting → `lynqu-prep` wrote the agenda; close its task here
- They asked for pricing → `lynqu-deal-desk` before you reply, so the number in
the email is one you can defend
- They raised an objection → `lynqu-competitors` for the honest answer
- The whole quiet cohort → `lynqu-lead-management` for the sweep, then follow up
only the revivable ones
- Response rates by cohort → `lynqu-pipeline-report`
## Example
> "/lynqu followup everyone who went quiet after a demo in the last month"
The run: finds 14 · excludes 2 touched by another rep this week and 1 with a quote
in active negotiation · groups the rest: 6 never opened the follow-up document
(likely wrong recipient — the draft asks who else should see it), 4 opened it
repeatedly including one by a new address (the draft speaks to a wider audience
and offers a short session), 1 has an open promise from the rep 19 days old (the
draft delivers it and apologises once, briefly) · shows three representative
drafts, sends on approval, closes 1 open promise, schedules 11 next steps, and
recommends 2 for a clean exit email.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!