Create and update Lynqu digital business cards — contact info, social links, services, template, palette — and check card views, scans and shares. Requires the Lynqu MCP server connected.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Gravisun/lynqu-ai-toolkit --skill lynqu-card-studio --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Lynqu Card Studio?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gravisun-lynqu-card-studio)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: lynqu-card-studio
description: Create and update Lynqu digital business cards — contact info, social links, services, template, palette — and check card views, scans and shares. Requires the Lynqu MCP server connected.
---
# Lynqu Card Studio
You build and maintain the surface people actually meet the company through. A
card is the top of the funnel: it's what gets scanned at a booth, tapped at a
dinner, and opened three weeks later when someone tries to remember who you were.
Everything else in this suite operates on leads that a card created.
Two things this skill does that a settings screen doesn't: it keeps a **team's**
cards consistent without flattening the people on them, and it reads engagement
as a signal — a card with 400 views and 2 saves has a problem worth naming.
## Invocation
```
/lynqu card [name | "my card" | "the sales team" | "how is my card doing"]
```
## Which server you're on matters
| Server | Scope | Use for |
|--------|-------|---------|
| **Personal** (`/mcp/me`) | Your own cards, your stats, your profile. No role gate | "My card", personal use, anyone without an org |
| **Organization** (`/mcp/v2`) | Org-managed cards across the team | Team rollout, brand consistency, org card stats |
If a user asks about "my card" and only the org server is connected, you can
still reach their own card through the org — but say which set you're looking at.
Confusion between a personal card and an org-managed one is the most common
source of "why did my edit disappear".
## Step 1: Read before you write
- **`who-am-i`** and **`get-profile`** — who this is, and their role
- **`list-cards`** (personal) or **`list-org-cards`** (org) — what already exists.
People commonly have several: a primary card, an event card, a legacy one
- **`get-card`** — the full current state before editing. Never patch a card you
haven't read; you'll wipe a section someone else set
Show the user what exists before changing anything. "You have three cards, this
one is your primary" prevents editing the wrong one.
## Step 2: Build or update
**`create-card`** for a new one, **`update-card`** to change an existing one.
What makes a card work, roughly in order of impact:
| Element | The bar |
|---------|---------|
| **Name and title** | The title people would search for, not the internal one. "VP Field Sales" beats "Commercial Lead II" |
| **Photo** | A real face. Cards without one get saved noticeably less |
| **One-line description** | What you do *for whom*. Not a slogan |
| **Contact methods** | The ones you actually answer. A phone number you ignore is worse than no phone number |
| **Social / links** | Two or three that are current. A dead link is a credibility leak |
| **Services** | What you can help with — this is what makes a card useful weeks later |
| **Template and palette** | Consistent with the brand, readable at arm's length on a phone in bad lighting |
Confirm before overwriting anything populated. Cards carry personal information
people care about, and an unasked-for edit to someone's title lands badly.
## Step 3: Team rollout (org server)
For a team, the tension is consistency versus authenticity. Get it wrong in
either direction and the cards stop working: identical cards feel corporate and
get saved less; unconstrained cards make the company look like eight companies.
- Hold **template, palette and company-level links** consistent
- Keep **photo, title, personal line and direct contact** individual
- **`list-org-cards`** to audit — find the missing photos, stale titles, dead
links and people who never finished setup
- Report the audit as a list the manager can act on. Don't mass-edit people's
personal fields without their say-so; that's a real trust boundary and it's
worth being explicit about
## Step 4: Read the engagement
**`get-card-stats`** — views, scans, shares, saves. And **`get-dashboard-summary`**
for how card activity feeds the wider funnel.
Read the *ratios*, not the totals:
| Pattern | What it means | What to do |
|---------|---------------|------------|
| High views, low saves | The card is seen but not worth keeping | Sharpen the description and services; add a reason to save |
| High scans, low views | QR is working, the card isn't loading well | Check the card is published and renders on mobile |
| Spike with no leads | Traffic isn't being captured | Wire a capture form or a booking link |
| Flat everything | The card isn't in circulation | This is a distribution problem, not a card problem |
The most useful sentence this skill produces is usually about the gap between
attention and conversion — a card getting attention that produces nothing is a
plumbing problem, and naming it is the value.
## Step 5: Connect it to the pipeline
A card that generates interest and captures nothing is a wasted surface.
- **Booking** — a booking link on the card turns interest into a meeting while
the person is still holding their phone. `list-booking-services` and
`manage-booking-settings` set it up
- **Capture** — `list-capture-forms` for events, so a scan becomes a lead
- **Attribution** — cards used at an event should feed that event's campaign, or
the ROI question is unanswerable later
## Output format
```markdown
# Card — {name}
**{n} cards · primary: {name} · server: {personal | organization}**
## Current
| Field | Value | Status |
|-------|-------|--------|
| Title / Photo / Description / Links / Services | … | ✓ or **missing** |
## Changed
| Field | From | To |
## Engagement — {period}
| Views | Scans | Shares | Saves | Save rate |
{One sentence on what the ratio says.}
## Team audit (org)
| Person | Missing | Stale |
## Suggested
1. {Specific improvement, and why it matters}
```
## Rules and constraints
- **Read the card before updating it.** Blind patches wipe sections.
- **Confirm before overwriting populated fields**, always.
- **Never edit someone else's personal fields** (photo, title, direct contact)
without explicit instruction. Template and brand elements are fair game for a
manager; personal ones aren't.
- **Never invent contact details or links.** A dead or wrong link on a card is
seen by customers.
- **Say which server you're on** when it could be ambiguous.
- **Report ratios, not just totals.** 400 views means nothing on its own.
- **Don't recommend a redesign when the problem is distribution.** A beautiful
card nobody scans has a different problem.
## Error handling
- **Multiple cards, unclear which** → list them with their status and ask. Editing
the wrong card is invisible until someone complains.
- **Card not found** → it may be on the other server (personal vs org), or belong
to someone else. Say which set you searched.
- **Update denied on an org-managed card** → some fields are locked by the org's
brand kit. Report which, and who can change them — this is a policy, not a bug.
- **Stats empty** → the card may be new, unpublished, or never shared. Check
published state before drawing conclusions from zeros.
- **Personal server only, org features requested** → team rollout and org card
stats need `/mcp/v2`. Say so and point at the connection docs.
- **Draft or deactivated card** → say so. A card that isn't live explains every
zero in the stats and should be the first thing fixed.
## Cross-skill integration
- Card scans at an event → `lynqu-event-blitz` for the attribution setup
- Scans that should become leads → `lynqu-lead-capture`
- A booking link on the card → meetings land in `lynqu-prep`
- Card engagement as a funnel metric → `lynqu-pipeline-report`
- New team member → set up their card here, then `lynqu-lead-management` for
their territory
## Example
> "/lynqu card — how is my card actually doing?"
The run: finds three cards, identifies the primary · pulls stats: 412 views, 380
scans, 11 saves over 90 days · names the problem plainly — *"people are scanning
it and looking, then not keeping it. That's a content gap, not a distribution
one"* · notes the card has no services listed and a one-line description that says
"Sales at Gravisun", which gives nobody a reason to save it · suggests three
specific changes and a booking link so interest converts on the spot · and points
out that 380 scans over 90 days with no capture form wired is the larger miss.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!