Skip to content
Back to skills

Go Linters

ASecurity

Add and validate custom Go analysis linters in gh-aw.

  • 5,269 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 1, 2026
ai-agentsgobashnodegitperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 1, 2026

npx -y skills add githubnext/gh-aw --skill go-linters --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Go Linters?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Go Linters
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/githubnext-go-linters/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/githubnext-go-linters)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: go-linters
description: Add and validate custom Go analysis linters in gh-aw.
---

# Go Linters

Use this guide when adding a new custom Go analysis linter in this repository.

For PR-driven linter generation (derive a rule from a specific pull request pattern), use `.github/skills/pr-to-go-linter/SKILL.md`.

## Where to add a new linter

1. Create a new package under `pkg/linters/<linter-name>/`.
2. Define an analyzer in that package (exported as `Analyzer`).
3. Add tests in the same package using `analysistest` with fixtures under `testdata/src/...`.
4. Register the analyzer in `cmd/linters/main.go` so it runs via the multichecker binary.

## Build and test linters

- Test only your linter package:
  - `go test ./pkg/linters/<linter-name>/...`
- Build the custom linter runner:
  - `go build ./cmd/linters`
- Run all custom linters across the repo:
  - `make golint-custom`

`make golint-custom` builds `cmd/linters` and runs it against `./cmd/...` and `./pkg/...`.

## Coverage-aware perf gating

For linters that flag micro-optimizations (allocation/perf rules), only apply them on lines that
tests actually exercise — "hot paths" — rather than on dead or rarely-executed code where the
optimization brings no measurable benefit. Use the shared `pkg/linters/internal/coverage` package:

1. In your analyzer file, register a `-hot-threshold` flag in `init()` (not as a var initializer,
   to avoid an `Analyzer`/`run`/flag initialization cycle):

   ```go
   var hotThreshold *int

   func init() {
       hotThreshold = coverage.RegisterHotThresholdFlag(Analyzer)
   }
   ```

2. Immediately before reporting a diagnostic, gate it with `coverage.ShouldApply`:

   ```go
   if !coverage.ShouldApply(pass, node.Pos(), *hotThreshold) {
       return
   }
   ```

`coverage.ShouldApply` is permissive by default: when no coverage profile is loaded via the
`GH_AW_LINT_COVERAGE_PROFILE` environment variable, or when `hot-threshold` is `0`, it always
returns `true`, preserving pre-coverage-aware behavior. Only wire this into linters whose fix has
a genuine performance rationale (extra allocations, O(n²) behavior, etc.) — purely
readability/style linters should not be coverage-gated.

### Generating the coverage profile

```bash
go test -covermode=count -coverprofile=/tmp/coverage.out ./...
export GH_AW_LINT_COVERAGE_PROFILE=/tmp/coverage.out
make golint-custom
```

This profile is read once per linter-runner process. To lint only a specific subtree, scope
the `go test` and `golint-custom` commands to the same package path.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.