Skip to content
Back to skills

X Openai Boltz Protein Design C48ca05

ASecurity

Design new protein binders with Boltz. Use when generating protein, peptide, antibody, nanobody, or custom binder candidates for a target. Not for screening existing proteins or small molecules.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 14, 2026
ai-agentsgoshellbashapi

Works with

  • claude code
  • terminal
  • cli
  • api
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 13 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 14, 2026

npx -y skills add Geruyang/agent-skills-library --skill x-openai-boltz-protein-design-c48ca05 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of X Openai Boltz Protein Design C48ca05?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for X Openai Boltz Protein Design C48ca05
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/geruyang-x-openai-boltz-protein-design-c48ca05/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/geruyang-x-openai-boltz-protein-design-c48ca05)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: x-openai-boltz-protein-design-c48ca05
description: Design new protein binders with Boltz. Use when generating protein, peptide, antibody, nanobody, or custom binder candidates for a target. Not for screening existing proteins or small molecules.
---

### 导出副本边界与技能别名

迁移、安装、修复和经验回写只作用于当前加载的目标宿主技能副本。原 Codex 技能/MCP、下载的源码和 `original-skills` 均为来源材料,不因执行本副本而写入;只有用户另行明确要求配置 Codex 产品本身时,才按该产品流程处理指定目标。脚本需要安装目录或状态目录时,显式提供目标路径;不得从 `CODEX_HOME` 隐式推断写入位置。

跨技能名称可能沿用源库别名。先查 [技能别名表](../../skill-aliases.json),优先选择同来源、同插件的条目,再使用其 `id` 调用或读取对应入口;不得假定旧 `$skill`、`superpowers:skill` 名称在新宿主直接注册。不能确定目标时先核对,不替换真实产品命令或 Shell 环境变量。

## 跨宿主使用约定

本副本供支持 Agent Skills 的客户端使用。先检查当前宿主实际提供的工具、权限和已连接服务,再执行正文工作流。原文中的宿主工具标识是能力参考;只有实际发现该工具时才可调用,其他宿主应使用经核验的等价 MCP、CLI 或 API。没有等价能力的步骤必须报告不可用,不能虚构调用或完成状态。

技能资源以本技能目录为基准;输出写入当前项目中用户指定的位置。通过技能名称或自然语言触发,具体快捷命令由宿主决定。涉及真实产品、模型 API、协议字段和官方网址的名称保持原意。授权、审批、隐私和工具范围限制在迁移后仍然有效;不得为兼容而扩大权限。具体依赖与迁移说明见同目录 `PORTABILITY.md`。

## Workflow

If `boltz-api` is missing from `PATH`, use `boltz-cli-setup` for install/update guidance before retrying.
If a command reports missing or expired authentication, use `boltz-cli-setup` to start `boltz-api auth login --device-code` before retrying; do not ask permission first.
If the agent host sandbox blocks `boltz-api` install/auth/API calls, use `boltz-cli-setup` to request the host sandbox bypass/escalation needed for user-wide CLI install, browser login, credential storage, temp files, or API access before retrying.

Use this skill when the user wants de novo protein / peptide / antibody / nanobody binders.

1. **Decide on target exploration first (new targets).** For a new target where the user hasn't already fixed the binding site and crop, your first action — before authoring a payload, normalizing the target, or running `estimate-cost` — is to raise the choice between a target-exploration pass and designing directly, with a **recommendation** for this target:
   - Unknown site, or a multi-domain / large target → recommend exploration (it scouts different input configurations for generation, ≈50 designs each, and finds the best before a full run).
   - A well-characterized site → it's fine to recommend going (mostly) direct, perhaps with a quick check of whether conditioning on the epitope beats letting the model find its own spot. State this plainly, as part of a conversation with the user about their target and goals, and let them choose.

   Phrase it as a question that works *with* the user (they may know their target's biology), e.g.:

   > "This is a fresh target — I'd suggest a quick exploration pass that scouts a few framings and picks the best before a full run. Or, if you already know the site and crop, we can design directly. Which would you like?"

   **Do not mention a campaign size or tier here** — not even folded into this opening approach question. The full-run size is settled later, after the scouting runs pick a winner (its yield informs the tier), so don't ask it up front when exploration is on the table. If the user opts into exploration — or has already said they want to explore / let the design find its own epitope — read [references/target-exploration.md](references/target-exploration.md), follow it, then resume at step 8 with the chosen framing and recommended `num_proteins`. If they want to design directly, continue below.
2. Normalize the target (same shape as protein-screen): `structure_template` if a CIF/PDB is available, else `no_template`.
3. Pick the `binder_specification` variant. Supported variants include:
   - `boltz_curated` — recommended default for antibody and nanobody design. Boltz selects from maintained scaffold/template lists (`binder: boltz_antibody` or `boltz_nanobody`).
   - `structure_template` — redesign motifs in an existing binder scaffold (CIF + `design_motifs` with `replacement` / `insertion` segments).
   - `no_template` — generate from the sequence DSL (fixed residues + designed segments like `5..10` or `8`).
4. For antibody or nanobody requests, ask before authoring the payload: "I recommend Boltz's curated antibody/nanobody scaffolds for this. Do you want the curated default, or do you have custom scaffold structures/CDR motifs to use?" If the user picks curated, use `type: boltz_curated`; if they want custom scaffold control, use `type: structure_template`.
5. Pick `modality`: `peptide`, `antibody`, `nanobody`, or `custom_protein` for `structure_template` and `no_template` (use `custom_protein` for a "miniprotein" or generic "protein binder"). **If the user already named the modality, take it as given — don't ask again.** Do not include `modality` on `boltz_curated`; use `binder` instead.
6. Pick `num_proteins` — see [Run sizing](#run-sizing). Valid range is **10 to 1,000,000** (server rejects outside it); **10** is the hard floor but it is a test size, not a campaign. When the user has not given a count, propose a campaign tier (default **50,000**), not the floor.
7. Supported optional features include rules such as excluded amino acids, excluded sequence motifs with `X` wildcards, and max hydrophobic fraction. Add `rules` only on request; read [references/api.md](references/api.md) for exact shapes and examples.
8. Author the payload YAML or JSON, then run `estimate-cost` and apply the **spending gate** (Always Do This) before `start`. (Cost model — tiered by total complex length, `estimate-cost` is the only source: see [`## Cost`](references/api.md) in api.md.)
9. `start` to submit. Capture the ID.
10. Discover the current executor's supported long-running/non-blocking process facility and launch `download-results` through that mechanism. Keep any returned process/session ID, but use `download-status` plus the run directory as durable truth. Verify that the process persists after a tool yield; do not invent yield/background flags. If the executor cannot sustain the downloader, provide the exact local command and report the limitation. Use a discovered scheduler only when scheduling is authorized and supported, and report its actual cadence. Always report the job ID, run name, output directory and next status command.
11. Rank from `<output-root>/<run-name>/results/index.jsonl` by `binding_confidence` descending. Use `iptm` and `min_interaction_pae` as tiebreakers. `optimization_score` is not emitted for this endpoint. Read [references/results.md](references/results.md) for output layout and metric details.

## Run sizing

De novo design is a generate-and-filter campaign: you make many binders and keep the rare good ones, so a real run is **large**. Do not anchor on the `num_proteins` floor of 10 — that is only useful for a quick setup test. When the user names a count, honor it (≥10). When they do not, explain the tiers and propose one:

| Tier | `num_proteins` | When |
|---|---|---|
| Small screen | 20,000 | Quick look / tight budget |
| **Medium (recommended)** | **50,000** | Default for a real campaign |
| Large | 100,000 | Hard target / maximal coverage |

Present the tiers as design **counts**, not dollars: don't put a price next to a tier unless `estimate-cost` returned it — run `estimate-cost` on the tier the user leans toward and show that figure, and never extrapolate one estimate across the others. Then apply the **spending gate** (Always Do This) before submitting. If the setup is unproven, suggest a small test run (tens of designs) or the full [target-exploration](references/target-exploration.md) pass first.

## Command Pattern

```bash
# Replace placeholders with concrete absolute paths before running.
# Use a short descriptive run name, for example: protein-design-<modality>-<target>-v1

boltz-api protein:design estimate-cost \
  --input @yaml:///absolute/path/payload.yaml

boltz-api protein:design start \
       --idempotency-key "<run-name>" \
       --input @yaml:///absolute/path/payload.yaml \
       --raw-output --transform id

# Copy the printed job ID into this command, then launch it in the agent
# runtime's background/non-blocking mode.
# Use only background/session parameters documented by the current executor.
# Do not append "&" or use nohup unless persistent child processes are supported and authorized.
boltz-api download-results \
  --id "<job-id-from-start>" --name "<run-name>" \
  --root-dir "/absolute/path/boltz-experiments" \
  --poll-interval-seconds 60
```

Payload keys are `num_proteins`, `target`, `binder_specification` — API body field names.

## Always Do This

- **For a new target, your first move is the step-1 conversation — never jump straight to a payload.** Establish what the binder is *for* and whether the user has already fixed the binding site/crop, then recommend a target-exploration pass vs. designing directly and let them choose (step 1). Only normalize the target and author a payload after that. If they've already fixed the site/crop or explicitly want to design directly, proceed.
- Enforce `10 <= num_proteins <= 1,000,000` before calling `estimate-cost` (server rejects outside that range), but 10 is the floor, not a campaign — see [Run sizing](#run-sizing) and propose a tier (default 50,000) when the user gives no count.
- **Spending gate — explicit go-ahead before every `start`.** `start` spends real money. A plan you already described, an earlier phase's approval, or a cost that looks "trivial" are **not** authorization — even a cheap run needs a fresh yes. Run `estimate-cost`, show the `estimated_cost_usd` it returns (summed for a batch), and wait for the user to say go. This holds **even when tool calls are pre-approved** (accept-edits / auto-accept / bypass modes) — there you are the only cost gate. Never quote or assume a dollar figure you didn't get from `estimate-cost` (cost model: [`## Cost`](references/api.md) in api.md).
- For antibody or nanobody design, recommend `binder_specification.type: boltz_curated` and ask the user to confirm they do not want custom scaffold/CDR control before building the payload. Use `binder: boltz_antibody` for antibody/Fab requests and `binder: boltz_nanobody` for nanobody/VHH requests.
- Residue indices are 0-based everywhere (`design_motifs.start_index`/`end_index`, `after_residue_index`, `epitope_residues`, `flexible_residues`, bonds, constraints).
- For CIF/PDB bytes, use `@data:///abs/path/file.cif` inside `structure.data`. Don't use bare `@path`.
- Sequence DSL for `designed_protein.value`: uppercase letters = fixed residues; integer `N` = exactly `N` designed residues; `MIN..MAX` = variable-length designed segment. Examples: `"20"`, `"5..10"`, `"ACDE8GHI"`, `"MKTAYI5..10VKSHFSRQ"`.
- Keep payload field names exactly as the API body names shown in `references/api.md`.
- Use absolute paths for the output root, payload files, and embedded target files. Do not `cd` into the run directory for follow-up commands; pass the same `--root-dir` and use absolute paths so later relative paths do not drift.
- Prefer one merged top-level payload via `--input @yaml:///absolute/path/payload.yaml` or `@json:///absolute/path/payload.json` for `estimate-cost` and `start`. Keep `--idempotency-key` and `--workspace-id` top-level; if they also appear inside `--input`, the top-level flags win.
- Direct object flags still work as overrides, such as `--target @yaml:///absolute/path/target.yaml` or `--binder-specification @json:///absolute/path/binder.json`. Piped YAML / JSON on stdin also works, but it must use API body field names. Use the same slug for both `--idempotency-key` and `--name`.
- In permission-gated agents such as Claude Code, keep each Boltz call as a top-level command that starts with `boltz-api`. Prefer concrete arguments over `sh -c`, inline environment assignments, aliases, wrapper scripts, loops, or pipelines around the `boltz-api` invocation unless the user already allowed that exact command form. Use `--raw-output --transform id`, read the printed ID, then paste that literal ID into the next `download-results` command.
- Prefer the verified executor's managed background/session mode for `download-results`. Confirm its returned status and persistence contract. Avoid shell detachment when the tool runner cleans up descendants before `.boltz-run.json` is fully written; preserve a runnable local command if no persistent mode exists.
- After the background/session starts, do not manually wait on it or run ad hoc polling loops. Wall-clock time scales roughly with `num_proteins`: under 100 often finishes in a few minutes, 100-1,000 may take several minutes to tens of minutes, and larger runs can take longer or hours depending on inputs and system load. Don't quote a fixed duration. `--poll-interval-seconds 60` is a sensible downloader default. `download-results` emits JSONL progress on stderr by default; add `--progress-format text --verbose` only when you explicitly want human-readable logs.
- When a discovered scheduler supports authorized follow-up checks, schedule `boltz-api --format json download-status --name "<run-name>" --root-dir "/absolute/path/boltz-experiments"` and stop the schedule once terminal. Suggested cadence by `num_proteins`: under 100 -> every 1-2 minutes; 100-1,000 -> every 5 minutes; over 1,000 -> every 15 minutes. Notify only on material changes or terminal completion/failure. Interactive progress checks use the actual executor's session/status tool; no guessed `write_stdin` or scheduler calls and no manual polling loop.
- If the current host has no heartbeat automation support, do not claim an automatic next check. Report the job ID, run name, output directory, and the command needed to check `download-status`.
- If detached download needs to be restarted, re-run `boltz-api download-results` with the same `--name "<run-name>"` and the same `--root-dir`.
- Only add `rules` on explicit user request.

## Escape Hatch

- Payload reference: <https://api.boltz.bio/docs/api/resources/protein/subresources/design/methods/start/>
- CLI flag names: `boltz-api protein:design start --help`

Read [references/api.md](references/api.md) for all `binder_specification` variants, motif shapes, sequence DSL, rules, modalities, and `target` variants. Read [references/results.md](references/results.md) after download when ranking designed binders or explaining outputs.

## Outputs

Rank from `results/index.jsonl` after `download-results`; use [references/results.md](references/results.md) for local file layout, metric meanings, and the designed-binder entity type gotcha.

Files in this skill

  • PORTABILITY.md1.4 KB
  • SKILL.md15.2 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml227 B
  • references/api.md12.3 KB
  • references/results.md1.1 KB
  • references/target-exploration.md16.4 KB
  • scripts/_common.py2.8 KB
  • scripts/analyze_results.py2.5 KB
  • scripts/crop_radius.py2.9 KB
  • scripts/detect_disorder.py3.3 KB
  • scripts/requirements.txt232 B
  • scripts/scan_sites.py6.5 KB
  • scripts/terminus.py1.6 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.