Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Analyst Research

ASecurity

End-to-end research workflow skill for investment analysts and policy researchers. Three scope modes the user picks at trigger time — light (4-5 page decision memo, ~15 min, 0 charts), medium (12-15 page topic brief, ~1 h, 6-10 charts), heavy (flagship report 30-40 pages / 15k+ words, ~2-3 h, 25-35+ charts, multi-stage workflow, multi-LLM, PDF + Word + WeChat + HTML derivations). Reports default to English; the AI replies in the user's chat language. Battle-tested on real macro/policy/equity ...

62 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/9/2026
researchgogit

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/9/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add genli-ai/market-research-skills --skill analyst-research --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Analyst Research?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Analyst Research
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/genli-ai-analyst-research/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/genli-ai-analyst-research)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: analyst-research
description: >-
  End-to-end research workflow skill for investment analysts and policy
  researchers. Three scope modes the user picks at trigger time — light (4-5
  page decision memo, ~15 min, 0 charts), medium (12-15 page topic brief, ~1
  h, 6-10 charts), heavy (flagship report 30-40 pages / 15k+ words, ~2-3 h,
  25-35+ charts, multi-stage workflow, multi-LLM, PDF + Word + WeChat + HTML
  derivations). Reports default to English; the AI replies in the user's chat
  language. Battle-tested on real macro/policy/equity reports (e.g. Saudi
  Vision 2030 deep-dive). Triggers when user types /analyst-research,
  /flagship-research, or describes needs like "research report", "topic
  analysis", "investment research", "做研报", "投研报告", "主题分析", "深度分析", "policy
  assessment", "industry deep-dive". Not for: pure news commentary (use
  topic-brief), slide decks (use deckster-slide-generator), one-shot Q&A.
---

<!-- Bilingual skill: this SKILL.md is the English primary; the Chinese mirror is SKILL.zh.md.
     Each references/*.md has a Chinese mirror references/*.zh.md (same content, two languages).
     The .md files are authoritative for the agent; the .zh.md files are for human readers. -->

# analyst-research · investment research workflow skill

A field-validated AI-assisted research workflow for investment analysts and policy researchers, packaged as a reusable Claude skill. Built on the methodology that produced the Saudi Vision 2030 deep-dive (35 figures, 15k+ words). Three scope modes; user picks at trigger time.

> **License**: MIT. Copyright © 2026 Ligen <ligen.thu@gmail.com>. See `LICENSE`.

## Step 0 — pick a mode (REQUIRED before loading references)

When this skill is triggered, **before** loading any reference file, ask the user to pick a scope. Present these three options verbatim:

```
This skill has three scope modes. Pick one based on your project size:

  light    4-5 page decision memo, 0 charts, ~15 min budget
           Single LLM session. Pure markdown footnote citations.
           Use for: exec brief, internal memo, quick decision support.

  medium   12-15 page topic analysis, 6-10 charts, ~1 h budget
           Single LLM. PDF + Word derivations. Sign-off checkpoint after draft.
           Use for: topic deep-dive, board memo with data, same-day analysis.

  heavy    Flagship report 30-40 pages / 15k+ words, 25-35+ charts, ~2-3 h budget
           Single or multi-LLM. PDF + Word + WeChat md + HTML publication.
           Runs the full 11-step staged workflow (framing → sourcing →
           analysis → drafting → review), with 3 sign-off checkpoints.
           Use for: industry deep-dive, macro thesis, policy assessment,
                    flagship investor publication.

Which mode fits your project? (reply with light, medium, or heavy)
```

If the user's trigger message already contains explicit scope hints (page count, chart count, time budget), infer the mode and ask one-line confirmation instead of presenting the full menu:

> "Sounds like ~10 pages with a few charts — medium mode. Going with that?"

After the mode is confirmed, ask one short language question: **"Report language — English (default), or another language?"** (see Language policy below). Then load the reference files for that mode.

## Loading order per mode

First **always** read `references/workflow.md` (≈40 lines, mode router). It points you to the mode-specific workflow file. (Each reference also has a `.zh.md` Chinese mirror; the agent reads the English `.md`.)

### light mode

1. **Required** `references/workflow.md` — overview + mode router
2. **Required** `references/workflow_light.md` — 6-step skeleton, soft stops only, BLUF executive summary, grep self-check
3. **Required** `references/_quarto-light.yml` — Quarto template optimized for a 4-5 page memo (no TOC, no number sections, footnote citations, 11pt body)
4. No charts. No bibliography. No HTML/WeChat derivation. Skip `report_style_spec.md` and `chart_template.py`.

Then proceed to `workflow_light.md §1 hypothesis lock` to start the 6-step flow.

### medium mode

1. **Required** `references/workflow.md` — overview + mode router
2. **Required** `references/workflow_medium.md` — 8-step skeleton, single LLM, one sign-off checkpoint after draft
3. **Required** `references/report_style_spec.md` — visual spec for the 6-10 charts (chart_template interface contract, color palette, font policy)
4. **Required** `references/_quarto-medium.yml` — Quarto template (footnote citations, no .bib, 11pt body, Songti SC CJK)
5. **On demand** `scripts/chart_template.py` — chart styling implementation

Then proceed to `workflow_medium.md §1 onboarding` to scaffold the project and start.

### heavy mode

1. **Required** `references/workflow.md` — overview + mode router
2. **Required** `references/workflow_heavy.md` — full 11-step skeleton, multi-LLM optional, 3 sign-off checkpoints (outline / draft / final)
3. **Required** `references/report_style_spec.md` — visual spec including HTML publication derivation
4. **On demand** `scripts/chart_template.py` — chart styling implementation
5. **On demand** `scripts/publication-style-template.html` — HTML publication template
6. **On demand** `scripts/author.jpg` — author photo placeholder for HTML page

Quarto template for heavy mode comes from `report_style_spec.md §5.1` (no separate `_quarto-heavy.yml` file — the spec is the source of truth for heavy mode quarto config).

Then proceed to `workflow_heavy.md §1.3 new-project onboarding` to scaffold the project (copies the whole `analyst-research/` folder into project root) and start.

## Mode comparison at a glance

Quick summary below; **authoritative source of truth is `MODE_REGISTRY.md`**. Edit that file first when mode parameters change, then propagate here.

| Dimension | light | medium | heavy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Output length | 4-5 pages | 12-15 pages | 30-40 pages / 15k+ words |
| Charts | 0 | 6-10 | 25-35+ |
| Runtime budget | ~15 min | ~1 h | ~2-3 h |
| LLM model | single | single | single or multi-LLM |
| Workflow steps | 6 | 8 | 11 |
| Hard stops | 0 | 1 (sign-off after draft) | 3 (outline / draft / final) |
| Derived outputs | PDF + Word | PDF + Word | PDF + Word + WeChat md + HTML |
| Citation | Markdown footnote | Markdown footnote | BibTeX + APA |
| Project scaffolding | minimal | minimal | full (10 numbered dirs) |
| Chart template | n/a | shared (chart_template.py) | shared (chart_template.py) |

For per-mode file dependencies, mode-upgrade trajectory, and retrospective section pointers, see `MODE_REGISTRY.md`.

## When NOT to use this skill

- Single-piece news commentary → use `market-research-skills:topic-brief`
- Slide deck / PPT → use `deckster-slide-generator`
- One-shot Q&A (no written report) → just answer directly, no skill
- Pure literary or marketing copy → not this skill's domain
- Tool/script-only project with no report output → not this skill's domain

This skill is built for **synthesis-and-analysis of an existing body of research and data** (it does not build original models, per `workflow_heavy.md §2.2`). It works best on topics with a deep existing literature (IMF / World Bank / IEA / BIS, investment-bank and consulting research, academic papers, regulatory disclosure). Bleeding-edge, news-driven topics with thin institutional coverage are a poor fit.

## How to upgrade or downgrade scope mid-project

If you start a project in `light` and find it needs more depth, re-trigger the skill in `medium` — the workflow's first step is identical (hypothesis lock), so the early work transfers. Going `medium → heavy` is the same. Downgrading is harder (you've already invested in scaffolding); cut deliverables rather than re-run.

## Project scaffold lives outside the skill

The skill stays read-only in `~/.claude/plugins/.../analyst-research/`. Per-project artifacts live in the user's project directory.

For **light mode**, the skill creates only `_quarto.yml` (copied from `_quarto-light.yml`) and a single working file in the project. No subfolders.

For **medium mode**, the skill creates `_quarto.yml` (from `_quarto-medium.yml`), `5_scripts/_path.py` (sys.path injector to load `chart_template`), and minimal numbered output directories.

For **heavy mode**, the skill copies the entire `analyst-research/` folder into the project root as a local working copy, then creates the full 10-numbered-directory scaffold per `workflow_heavy.md §11`. This lets project-level overrides (palette, fonts, domain conventions) live in the local copy without polluting the skill.

## Skill evolution

After each project closes, follow the retrospective section of the mode-specific workflow file (workflow_heavy.md §9, workflow_medium.md §8, workflow_light.md §6) to decide which project learnings get promoted back to the skill itself. The skill is git-versioned; each promotion bumps minor version. Major architectural changes bump major version.

## Language policy

This skill is **bilingual (English + Chinese)** following the marketplace convention. Every authored doc exists in two files: an English `.md` (e.g. `SKILL.md`, `references/workflow_heavy.md`) and a Chinese mirror `.zh.md` (e.g. `SKILL.zh.md`, `references/workflow_heavy.zh.md`). **English is the single source of truth; the `.zh.md` is a synchronized translation, not an independent version.** Edit protocol, no exceptions: **always write or change the English `.md` first, then propagate the same change to the `.zh.md` translation in the same change-set.** Never edit only the Chinese, and never let the two drift; when wording conflicts, the English `.md` wins.

1. **Conversation replies follow the user's chat language.** English chat → reply in English; Chinese chat → reply in Chinese; likewise for any other language. This is runtime behaviour, not a stored artifact.
2. **Report language defaults to English.** At Step 0 / onboarding, after the mode is picked, ask one short question: "Report language — English (default), or another language?" If the user does not specify, write the draft in English; if they name another language, write in that. Lock the choice in the project `CLAUDE.md`. This supersedes any older "draft follows hypothesis language" rule.
3. **Language-conditioned grep redlines.** For an English report the Chinese colon-ratio redline is skipped and the unescaped-`$` redline is mandatory (escape dollar amounts as `\$`). For a Chinese report the reverse applies.

The Chinese mirror of this file is `SKILL.zh.md`. 中文版见 `SKILL.zh.md`。

Attribution

genli-aigenli-ai
View sourceMore from genli-ai →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

486982 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

805541 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

486981 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →