Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Galleon Lido Withdrawals

ASecurity

Use when requesting or claiming Lido stETH or wstETH withdrawals, reconciling unstETH NFTs, or comparing the native queue with a secondary-market exit.

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/28/2026
ai-agentsgitdocumentation

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/28/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add galleonlabs/crypto-defi-skills --skill galleon-lido-withdrawals --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Galleon Lido Withdrawals?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Galleon Lido Withdrawals
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/galleonlabs-galleon-lido-withdrawals/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/galleonlabs-galleon-lido-withdrawals)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Files
SKILL.md
---
name: galleon-lido-withdrawals
description: "Use when requesting or claiming Lido stETH or wstETH withdrawals, reconciling unstETH NFTs, or comparing the native queue with a secondary-market exit."
license: MIT
compatibility: "Read-only EVM RPC or official provider tools; Bun is optional for offline examples. No signer required."
metadata:
  version: "0.2.0"
  author: "Andrew Wilkinson and Galleon Labs"
  source: "https://github.com/galleonlabs/crypto-defi-skills"
---

# Lido withdrawal queue

Deliver a request/claim ledger for the **Lido Ethereum stETH WithdrawalQueueERC721**. This is not the stVault DeFi wrapper queue. Identify chain, official queue address, token, amount and request owner. If the asset is wstETH on an L2, first establish its documented redemption route; do not pretend the Ethereum queue exists on that chain.

## Request or swap decision

Read queue pause/bunker state and current minimum/maximum request size; never bake those limits or an ETA into a recommendation. For wstETH, distinguish wrapped units from their current stETH equivalent. Compare a same-size executable secondary-market quote with the queue path: net ETH after gas, price impact, waiting period, and slashing exposure. A quote is not a completed exit; an estimated queue duration is not a deadline guarantee.

For the queue, the request transaction locks the submitted stake and produces an unstETH NFT. It does not transfer ETH to the user. Explain the request and claim stages, including the lack of continued staking rewards on queued amounts. Prepare token-specific approval/permit and `requestWithdrawals` or `requestWithdrawalsWstETH` using the verified ABI. Split large requests only within the queue limits and the user's total authorized amount; record every resulting request ID from the receipt.

## Reconcile existing requests

1. Read `getWithdrawalRequests(owner)` for discovery, then `getWithdrawalStatus(ids)` for the known IDs and `ownerOf(id)` for unclaimed NFTs. Current NFT ownership controls the claim; original requester and current owner can differ.
2. Classify each ID as pending, finalized-unclaimed, or claimed. A transfer is not a second withdrawal and a finalized request is not yet ETH in the wallet. A burned claimed NFT may make `ownerOf` revert; reconcile against status and receipt rather than calling it lost.
3. For finalized-unclaimed IDs, obtain checkpoint hints with `findCheckpointHints(ids, 1, getLastCheckpointIndex())`, using IDs in the ordering required by the deployed interface. If there are no checkpoints, do not pass an invalid range. Query `getClaimableEther(ids, hints)`; do not assume the originally requested stETH equals claimable ETH.
4. Prepare the documented claim function for the actual owner/caller and recipient. Recompute hints if state or request list changes. Simulate the claim and separately check the recipient can receive ETH.
5. After a confirmed claim, reconcile request status, NFT burn and ETH receipt/net balance delta adjusted for gas. A claim hash alone is not completion. Never request a duplicate withdrawal to repair a pending claim.

Return one row per request ID with owner, requested amount, finalized/claimed flags, claimable ETH, observation block and next action. Keep secondary-market swaps and queue claims separate in the record.

## Evidence and completion

Return the requested decision, exact deployment and chain, block/time, raw-unit observations, calculation assumptions, and the next missing read. Distinguish an indexed estimate, an onchain read, a simulated call and a confirmed transaction. Research ends with an actionable decision record; it does not require connecting a wallet.

For a requested write, prepare the complete unsigned sequence and simulate with the actual sender, amount, recipient and allowance state. Preserve authorization already supplied; research does not grant debt, spending or signing authority. Never request keys. After an authorized transaction, verify its receipt and the relevant balance or position change. On an ambiguous timeout, reconcile its hash and nonce before retrying.

Read [protocol references and worked record](references/recipe.md) only for the selected operation. Documentation checked 2026-09-27; refresh deployments and current parameters at use time. This directory is independently installable.

Attribution

galleonlabsgalleonlabs
View sourceMore from galleonlabs →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

695601 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →