Assess Macos Threat

---
name: assess-macos-threat
description: Assess a suspected macOS threat using exact host and artifact evidence. Use for suspicious apps, processes, downloads, profiles, extensions, alerts, persistence, privacy, or network activity while keeping protections distinct.
---

# Assess macOS Threat

## Overview

Establish the affected Mac and event timeline before changing the system. Use Apple security layers as separate evidence sources and route focused persistence, runtime, artifact, or containment work from the resulting record.

Read [references/macos-security-layers.md](references/macos-security-layers.md) when interpreting platform controls or alerts.

## Workflow

1. Identify the Mac and event.
   - Record model/chip, exact macOS build, update state, user/session, time/timezone, managed-device context, and what the person observed.
   - Record whether evidence comes from the affected physical host, a macOS guest, or a reproduction guest. For guest evidence, include the VM framework/tool, virtual hardware, restore image, integrations, baseline/reset state, and anti-VM or hardware fidelity limits.
2. Preserve the triggering evidence.
   - Record alert text/screenshots, file path/source/hash, quarantine metadata, process identity, prompts, downloads, and relevant logs before cleanup.
3. Inspect artifact identity.
   - Record real type, bundle/package metadata, signer, Team ID, signature verification, notarization assessment, entitlements, modifications, and source channel.
   - Route binary internals to Reverse Engineering Skills.
4. Inspect platform evidence.
   - Check Gatekeeper/quarantine context, XProtect detections or remediation evidence, TCC/privacy grants, SIP state, profiles, login/background items, system extensions, and relevant system policy without disabling protections.
5. Correlate behavior.
   - Route process/file/network evidence to runtime inspection and startup/registration clues to persistence inspection.
   - Separate a blocked attempt from successful execution and successful execution from compromise.
6. Assess and advise.
   - State classification/confidence, immediate isolation needs, evidence gaps, and the smallest next workflow.
   - Route ordinary application permission implementation to `macos-privacy-permissions-workflow`; route private symbols, control internals, or exact-build Gatekeeper/XProtect/TCC questions to `research-macos-security-control`.
   - Do not generalize guest-observed behavior to a physical Mac when hardware, Secure Enclave, recoveryOS, kernel/system-extension, device, or anti-VM behavior remains unresolved.

## Output

Return host/event identity, platform-layer evidence, artifact identity, observed behavior, assessment/confidence, immediate advice, and focused next checks.

Do not interpret an XProtect or Gatekeeper event alone as proof that malware executed or that the host is compromised. Preserve the event type, exact OS/security-data state, actor/artifact identity, and observed behavior.