Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Verification

ASecurity

Use when marking a task as complete, finishing a feature, or claiming a bug is fixed. Ensures functional resolution is verified with evidence before closing.

29 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 5/28/2026
ai-agentsgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 5/28/2026

$npx -y skills add fusengine/agents --skill verification --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Verification?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Verification
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/fusengine-verification/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fusengine-verification)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: verification
description: Use when marking a task as complete, finishing a feature, or claiming a bug is fixed. Ensures functional resolution is verified with evidence before closing.
---

# Verification Before Completion

## Overview

**Sniper validates CODE QUALITY. Verification validates FUNCTIONAL RESOLUTION.** Both are needed before closing any task.

Sniper catches linter errors, SOLID violations, and code style issues. Verification ensures the **original request is actually fulfilled** -- the right behavior, the right output, the right fix. A task can pass sniper with zero errors and still be functionally wrong.

| Aspect | Sniper | Verification |
|--------|--------|-------------|
| **Focus** | Code quality | Functional correctness |
| **Checks** | Linting, SOLID, style | Acceptance criteria, regressions, side effects |
| **Runs** | After any code change | Before marking task as complete |
| **Result** | Clean code | Solved problem |

---

## Agent Workflow

When invoked, follow the 6-step verification process below **before** marking any task as completed.

### 6-Step Verification Process

**Step 1: Re-read the original request**
Go back to the original issue, task description, or user message. Read it word by word. Do not rely on memory or assumptions.

**Step 2: List ALL acceptance criteria**
Extract every explicit and implicit requirement from the original request. Number them. If the request is vague, list what a reasonable user would expect.

**Step 3: Verify each criterion with evidence**
For each criterion, provide concrete evidence of resolution:
- Test output showing the expected behavior
- Log output confirming the fix
- Screenshot of the UI change
- Code diff showing the implementation

**Step 4: Check for regressions**
Run the full test suite. Compare results before and after. No new failures, no new warnings.

**Step 5: Check for side effects**
Review every modified file. Confirm no accidental changes to unrelated code. Verify dependencies and configuration are unchanged unless required.

**Step 6: Confirm functional resolution**
State explicitly: "Original problem is FUNCTIONALLY resolved" with a summary of evidence, or list what remains unresolved.

---

## Reference Guide

| Resource | Path | Content |
|----------|------|---------|
| Checklist | `references/checklist.md` | Full verification checklist with all categories |
| Common Misses | `references/common-misses.md` | Frequently forgotten verification items |

---

## Integration with APEX

Verification runs **between eLicit and eXamine** in the APEX workflow:

```
Analyze -> Plan -> Execute -> eLicit -> [VERIFICATION] -> eXamine (sniper)
```

This ensures functional correctness is confirmed before code quality validation. A task is only complete when **both** verification and sniper pass.

---

## Critical Rules

| Rule | Reason |
|------|--------|
| Never skip re-reading the original request | Prevents solving the wrong problem |
| Evidence required for every criterion | "It works" is not evidence |
| Full test suite, not just new tests | Catches regressions |
| Review ALL modified files | Catches accidental side effects |
| Both verification AND sniper must pass | Quality without correctness is useless |

Attribution

fusenginefusengine
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from fusengine →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698621 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →