Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Prompt Optimization

ASecurity

Analyze and improve existing prompts for better performance

29 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 2/7/2026
ai-agentspythongorailsapisecurityperformance

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 2/12/2026

$npx -y skills add fusengine/agents --skill prompt-optimization --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Prompt Optimization?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Prompt Optimization
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/fusengine-prompt-optimization/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fusengine-prompt-optimization)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: prompt-optimization
description: Analyze and improve existing prompts for better performance
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit
---

# Prompt Optimization

Skill for analyzing and improving existing prompts.

## Optimization Workflow

```
1. ANALYZE current prompt
   ↓
2. IDENTIFY issues
   ↓
3. APPLY corrections
   ↓
4. VALIDATE improvement
   ↓
5. DOCUMENT changes
```

## Analysis Checklist

### Clarity
- [ ] Unambiguous instructions?
- [ ] Clearly defined objective?
- [ ] Precise vocabulary?

### Structure
- [ ] Well-delimited sections?
- [ ] Logical order?
- [ ] Clear hierarchy?

### Completeness
- [ ] Output format defined?
- [ ] Error cases handled?
- [ ] Examples if needed?

### Guardrails
- [ ] Explicit limits?
- [ ] Forbidden behaviors listed?
- [ ] Appropriate security?

## Common Problems and Solutions

### 1. Vague Instructions

**Before:**
```
Write a good summary.
```

**After:**
```
Write a 100-150 word summary that:
1. Captures the main idea in the first sentence
2. Includes 2-3 supporting key points
3. Uses accessible language (high school level)
4. Avoids technical jargon
```

### 2. Lack of Context

**Before:**
```
Analyze this code.
```

**After:**
```
Analyze this Python code focusing on:
- Performance (algorithmic complexity)
- Readability (PEP 8 conventions)
- Security (OWASP vulnerabilities)

Context: Code for production REST API, 10k requests/day.
```

### 3. Undefined Format

**Before:**
```
Give me recommendations.
```

**After:**
```
Provide 3-5 recommendations in this format:

## Recommendation [N]: [Short title]
**Impact:** [High/Medium/Low]
**Effort:** [High/Medium/Low]
**Action:** [1-2 sentence description]
```

### 4. No Error Handling

**Before:**
```
Translate this text to French.
```

**After:**
```
Translate this text to French.

IF the text is already in French:
  → Indicate "The text is already in French" and suggest style improvements.

IF the text contains technical jargon:
  → Keep technical terms in English with translation in parentheses.

IF the text is too long (>1000 words):
  → Ask for confirmation before proceeding.
```

### 5. Insufficient Emphasis

**Before:**
```
Don't make up information.
```

**After:**
```
CRITICAL - ZERO TOLERANCE: NEVER make up information.
IF uncertain → Explicitly say "I'm not sure about..."
IF no data → Say "I don't have this information"
```

## Improvement Techniques

### Add Chain-of-Thought

```markdown
# Addition
Before answering, think step by step:
1. What exactly is being asked?
2. What information do I have?
3. What is the best approach?
4. Are there pitfalls to avoid?
```

### Add Examples

```markdown
# Addition
## Examples

### Good example
Input: [...]
Output: [Expected output]

### Bad example (to avoid)
Input: [...]
Incorrect output: [What we don't want]
Why incorrect: [Explanation]
```

### Strengthen Guardrails

```markdown
# Addition
## Forbidden (STRICT)
- [Forbidden behavior 1]
- [Forbidden behavior 2]

## Required (ALWAYS)
- [Required behavior 1]
- [Required behavior 2]
```

## Optimization Report Format

```markdown
# Optimization of [Prompt Name]

## Before/After Score
| Criterion | Before | After |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Clarity | X/10 | Y/10 |
| Structure | X/10 | Y/10 |
| Completeness | X/10 | Y/10 |
| Guardrails | X/10 | Y/10 |
| **Total** | **X/40** | **Y/40** |

## Identified Issues
1. [Issue 1]
2. [Issue 2]

## Applied Changes
| Before | After | Reason |
|--------|-------|--------|
| [...] | [...] | [...] |

## Optimized Prompt
---
[THE COMPLETE PROMPT]
---

## Recommended Tests
- [ ] Standard case test
- [ ] Edge case test 1
- [ ] Edge case test 2
```

## Forbidden

- Never change the original meaning of the prompt
- Never add unrequested features
- Never remove existing guardrails
- Never make the prompt longer without justification

Attribution

fusenginefusengine
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from fusengine →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →