Use when a Fused canvas.toml contains (or needs) a [[comments]] block — e.g. the user asks to check/fix/resolve canvas comments, review feedback pins on a canvas, or leave comments on a canvas for someone else. Covers reading, writing, and resolving comments via the fused CLI pull/push workflow.
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add fusedio/skills --skill canvas-comments --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Canvas Comments?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fusedio-canvas-comments)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: canvas-comments
description: Use when a Fused canvas.toml contains (or needs) a [[comments]] block — e.g. the user asks to check/fix/resolve canvas comments, review feedback pins on a canvas, or leave comments on a canvas for someone else. Covers reading, writing, and resolving comments via the fused CLI pull/push workflow.
---
# Fused canvas comments ([[comments]] in canvas.toml)
Pinned comment threads on a Fused canvas serialize as top-level `[[comments]]` blocks in `canvas.toml`. Comments with `status = "open"` are your work queue; resolving one is a three-field contract plus a reply, so the Workbench UI correctly attributes the work to AI.
## Read: find the work
1. Get the canvas locally: `fused workbench canvas pull <name> -o <dir>` (or use the folder you have).
2. Every `[[comments]]` block where `status = "open"` is an actionable request.
3. `anchor_udf = "<udfName>"` tells you WHICH node it's about — the fix belongs in `<udfName>.py` (or `.json`/`.md`/`.html` with that stem). No `anchor_udf` ⇒ canvas-level comment; read `content` for scope.
## Resolve: the full contract (all four steps, not just status)
After actually making the fix the comment asks for:
```toml
[[comments]]
id = "cmt-a" # never change existing ids
# ...existing fields stay untouched...
status = "resolved" # 1. was "open"
resolved_by = "ai" # 2. REQUIRED — this is what shows the AI badge in the UI
resolved_at = 1749600200000 # 3. ms epoch timestamp (date +%s000)
[[comments.replies]] # 4. say what you did
id = "reply-<unique>"
content = "Changed the default to 7. Done."
created_at = 1749600200000
created_by = "ai" # REQUIRED on AI-written replies
```
**Setting only `status = "resolved"` is wrong** — without `resolved_by = "ai"` the UI cannot attribute the resolution, and without a reply the user doesn't know what changed.
## Write: adding a new comment
```toml
[[comments]]
id = "cmt-<unique>" # required, stable, unique in file
x = 120.0 # required: canvas coords (floats)
y = 80.0
anchor_udf = "process_data" # optional: node NAME (matches a [[canvas.nodes]] udfName)
offset_x = 24.0 # only meaningful with anchor_udf
offset_y = 16.0
content = "non-empty text" # blank content is silently dropped
status = "open"
created_by = "ai" # REQUIRED when you author it
created_at = 1749600000000 # ms epoch
```
## Field reference (snake_case in TOML — never camelCase)
| Field | Notes |
|---|---|
| `id`, `content`, `x`, `y` | required; blank/whitespace `content` ⇒ row dropped on parse |
| `status` | `open` \| `resolving` \| `resolved`; omitted ⇒ `open` |
| `anchor_udf`, `offset_x`, `offset_y` | anchor by UDF *name*, not node id; unknown name ⇒ anchor silently dropped |
| `created_by`, `resolved_by` | `"user"` \| `"ai"`; omitted = user |
| `created_at`, `updated_at`, `resolved_at` | ms epoch integers |
| `replies` | `[[comments.replies]]` with `id`, `content`, `created_at`, optional `updated_at`, `created_by` |
Never write a TOML `null`/empty value — omit absent fields entirely. Comments sort by `created_at` on export; don't reorder blocks by hand.
## Verify, then push
```bash
fused workbench canvas validate <dir> # structure check
fused workbench canvas push <dir> --canvas <name>
```
## Common mistakes
- Resolving without `resolved_by = "ai"` / `resolved_at` / a reply (the #1 miss).
- camelCase keys (`createdAt`) in TOML — the parser ignores them; data silently lost.
- Anchoring by node id instead of `anchor_udf` name.
- Marking `resolved` without actually making the code change the comment asks for.
- Editing/deleting other people's `id`s or `created_at`s — append, don't rewrite history.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!