Use when drafting a spec/ACs for an app feature, planning or building UI views with filters/search/reports, implementing delete/mutation flows, or reviewing feature work — routes to the cross-project behavioral quality patterns (QP-xx) that recurring consumer-app defects proved necessary (URL reflects view state; deletes define cascade/orphan policy; empty/loading/error states; chevron alignment; double-submit guards...). Patterns become spec ACs by ID and carry copy-ready smoke recipes. Do N...
Scanned 9/13/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add fusebase-dev/fusebase-flow --skill app-quality-patterns --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of App Quality Patterns?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fusebase-dev-app-quality-patterns)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: app-quality-patterns
description: Use when drafting a spec/ACs for an app feature, planning or building UI views with filters/search/reports, implementing delete/mutation flows, or reviewing feature work — routes to the cross-project behavioral quality patterns (QP-xx) that recurring consumer-app defects proved necessary (URL reflects view state; deletes define cascade/orphan policy; empty/loading/error states; chevron alignment; double-submit guards...). Patterns become spec ACs by ID and carry copy-ready smoke recipes. Do NOT use for process/lifecycle questions (FLOW_RULES owns those), for stack-specific HOW guidance (CLI skills like app-ui-design own that), or to gate semantically by regex.
source_inspiration: conceptual-only
license_status: clean-room-original
fusebase_flow_version: "3.19"
risk_level: low
invocation: automatic
expected_outputs:
- spec ACs citing applicable QP IDs (via requirements-specification)
- design-brief QP citations (via implementation-planning)
- S<n> smoke prompts copied from pattern Verify recipes
- review findings citing QP IDs
related_workflows:
- eight-phase-flow.md
- smoke-verification.md
hook_dependencies:
- none
---
# App Quality Patterns (QP library)
> **Style:** Mode-B-lite router. The patterns live in `references/<category>.md` — load ONLY the categories the feature touches. Each pattern: ID · Trigger · Requirement · Verify (copy-ready smoke recipe) · Anti-pattern.
## Purpose
Cross-project behavioral "definition of done" requirements that LLM-built apps repeatedly miss. They are not stack guidance (CLI skills own HOW) and not process rules (FLOW_RULES owns those) — they are WHAT must be true of the built feature. Distilled from recurring consumer-project defects; the library grows one table row at a time.
## Category index (load on trigger match)
| Category | File | Load when the feature involves | IDs |
|---|---|---|---|
| State & navigation | `references/state-and-navigation.md` | views with filters / search / sort / pagination / tabs / reports / deep links / browser navigation | QP-01..QP-04 |
| Data integrity | `references/data-integrity.md` | create / update / delete flows, related records, caching, retries | QP-10..QP-14 |
| UI polish | `references/ui-polish.md` | any user-facing UI: lists, forms, dropdowns, dates | QP-20..QP-24 |
## Integration contract (how patterns reach the lifecycle)
| Phase | What happens | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Specify | `requirements-specification` scans this index; every matching pattern becomes a spec **AC citing the QP ID** (e.g., "AC4 — filter/report state encoded in URL; refresh restores exact view (QP-01)"). The AC then flows through tasks → gate → smoke → review on the existing machinery — no new gates. | PO |
| Plan | design brief lists the applicable QP IDs (one line) | PO |
| Implement | the AI Developer reads the cited reference category before building the touching surface | AI Developer |
| Gate/Smoke | the pattern's **Verify** line is a copy-ready S<n> smoke recipe | PO defines, Deploy executes |
| Review | `code-review` checks QP-cited ACs were honored (semantic, by reading) | reviewer |
## Growth rule
A defect observed across ≥2 projects (or once with clear generality) → add ONE row to the matching category file (new category file only when none fits) via `skill-authoring`; ship in the next release. Project-specific patterns go in that project's `docs/skills/`, never here. Keep rows dense — this library is loaded mid-spec.
## Anti-patterns
- Do NOT paste pattern bodies into specs/handoffs — cite the QP ID (FR-23; the AC text carries the requirement one line).
- Do NOT turn QPs into regex/lint gates — behavioral requirements verify at smoke/review (FR-25 lesson, inverse case).
- Do NOT load all categories for every feature — the index exists to scope the read.
- Do NOT use QPs to override stack-specific CLI guidance — QP says WHAT, CLI skills say HOW.
## Clean-room note
Original Fusebase Flow content. The patterns codify widely-known web/app engineering practice observed failing in LLM-generated apps; no third-party code, prompts, skill files, or hook scripts are copied. See `docs/source-map.md`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!