Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for \"review paper\", \"survey\", \"literature review\", \"综述\", \"systematic review\", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add FridrichMethod/awesome-skills --skill medical-imaging-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Medical Imaging Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fridrichmethod-medical-imaging-review)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: medical-imaging-review
description: "Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for \"review paper\", \"survey\", \"literature review\", \"综述\", \"systematic review\", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging."
metadata:
author: user
version: "2.0.0"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- Glob
- Grep
- Bash
- WebSearch
- WebFetch
- Task
- mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__search_papers
- mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__download_paper
- mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__read_paper
- mcp__pubmed-mcp-server__pubmed_search_articles
- mcp__zotero__zotero_search_items
- mcp__zotero__zotero_get_item_fulltext
---
# Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill
Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.
## Quick Start
1. **Initialize project** with three core files:
- `CLAUDE.md` - Writing guidelines and terminology
- `IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md` - Staged execution plan
- `manuscript_draft.md` - Main manuscript
2. **Follow the 7-phase workflow** (see [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md))
3. **Use domain-specific templates** (see [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md))
---
## Core Principles
### Writing Style
- **Hedging language**: "may", "suggests", "appears to", "has shown promising results"
- **Avoid absolutes**: Never say "X is the best method"
- **Citation support**: Every claim needs reference
- **Limitations**: Each method section needs a Limitations paragraph
### Required Elements
- **Key Points box** (3-5 bullets) after title
- **Comparison table** for each major section
- **Performance metrics**: Dice (0.XXX), HD95 (X.XX mm)
- **Figure placeholders** with detailed captions
- **References**: 80-120 typical, organized by topic
### Paragraph Structure
```
Topic sentence (main claim)
→ Supporting evidence (citations + data)
→ Analysis (critical evaluation)
→ Transition to next paragraph
```
---
## Literature Sources
Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:
| Source | Best For | Tools |
|--------|----------|-------|
| ArXiv | Latest DL methods, preprints | `search_papers`, `read_paper` |
| PubMed | Clinical validation, peer-reviewed | `pubmed_search_articles` |
| Zotero | Existing library, organized refs | `zotero_search_items` |
For MCP configuration details, see [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md).
---
## Standard Review Structure
```markdown
# [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions
## Key Points
- [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings]
## Abstract
## 1. Introduction
### 1.1 Clinical Background
### 1.2 Technical Challenges
### 1.3 Scope and Contributions
## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics
### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1)
### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics
## 3. Deep Learning Methods
### 3.1 [Category 1]
### 3.2 [Category 2]
(Table 2: Method Comparison)
## 4. Downstream Applications
## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3)
## 6. Discussion
### 6.1 Current Limitations
### 6.2 Future Directions
## 7. Conclusion
## References
```
---
## Method Description Template
```markdown
### 3.X [Method Category]
[1-2 paragraph introduction with motivation]
**[Method Name]:** [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method], which [innovation]:
- [Key component 1]
- [Key component 2]
Achieves Dice of X.XX on [dataset].
**Limitations:** Despite advantages, [category] methods face:
(1) [limit 1]; (2) [limit 2].
```
---
## Citation Patterns
```markdown
# Data citation
"...achieved Dice of 0.89 [23]"
# Method citation
"Gu et al. [45] proposed..."
# Multi-citation
"Several studies demonstrated... [12, 15, 23]"
# Comparative
"While [12] focused on..., [15] addressed..."
```
---
## Reference Files
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) | Detailed 7-phase workflow |
| [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) | CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md templates |
| [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md) | Domain-specific method categories |
| [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md) | MCP server configuration |
| [references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md) | Pre-submission quality checklist |
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!