Clarify WHAT a phase delivers with ambiguity scoring; produces a SPEC.md before discuss-phase.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add friday-ai-codes/friday-ai --skill gsd-spec-phase --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Gsd Spec Phase?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/friday-ai-codes-gsd-spec-phase)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: gsd-spec-phase
description: "Clarify WHAT a phase delivers with ambiguity scoring; produces a SPEC.md before discuss-phase."
---
<cursor_skill_adapter>
## A. Skill Invocation
- This skill is invoked when the user mentions `gsd-spec-phase` or describes a task matching this skill.
- Treat all user text after the skill mention as `{{GSD_ARGS}}`.
- If no arguments are present, treat `{{GSD_ARGS}}` as empty.
## B. User Prompting
When the workflow needs user input, prompt the user conversationally:
- Present options as a numbered list in your response text
- Ask the user to reply with their choice
- For multi-select, ask for comma-separated numbers
## C. Tool Usage
Use these Cursor tools when executing GSD workflows:
- `Shell` for running commands (terminal operations)
- `StrReplace` for editing existing files
- `Read`, `Write`, `Glob`, `Grep`, `Task`, `WebSearch`, `WebFetch`, `TodoWrite` as needed
## D. Subagent Spawning
When the workflow needs to spawn a subagent:
- Use `Task(subagent_type="generalPurpose", ...)`
- The `model` parameter maps to Cursor's model options (e.g., "fast")
</cursor_skill_adapter>
<objective>
Clarify phase requirements through structured Socratic questioning with quantitative ambiguity scoring.
**Position in workflow:** `spec-phase → discuss-phase → plan-phase → execute-phase → verify`
**How it works:**
1. Load phase context (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, ROADMAP.md, STATE.md)
2. Scout the codebase — understand current state before asking questions
3. Run Socratic interview loop (up to 6 rounds, rotating perspectives)
4. Score ambiguity across 4 weighted dimensions after each round
5. Gate: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimensions meet minimums → write SPEC.md
6. Commit SPEC.md — discuss-phase picks it up automatically on next run
**Output:** `{phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-SPEC.md` — falsifiable requirements that lock "what/why" before discuss-phase handles "how"
</objective>
<execution_context>
@/Users/zaneliu/Projects/open-source/friday-ai/.cursor/gsd-core/workflows/spec-phase.md
@/Users/zaneliu/Projects/open-source/friday-ai/.cursor/gsd-core/templates/spec.md
</execution_context>
<runtime_note>
**Copilot (VS Code):** Use `vscode_askquestions` wherever this workflow calls `conversational prompting`. They are equivalent.
</runtime_note>
<context>
Phase number: {{GSD_ARGS}} (required)
**Flags:**
- `--auto` — Skip interactive questions; Claude selects recommended defaults and writes SPEC.md
- `--text` — Use plain-text numbered lists instead of TUI menus (required for `/rc` remote sessions)
Context files are resolved in-workflow using `init phase-op`.
</context>
<process>
Execute end-to-end.
**MANDATORY:** Read the workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The workflow contains the complete step-by-step process including the Socratic interview loop, ambiguity scoring gate, and SPEC.md generation. Do not improvise from the objective summary above.
</process>
<success_criteria>
- Codebase scouted for current state before questioning begins
- All 4 ambiguity dimensions scored after each interview round
- Gate passed: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimension minimums met
- SPEC.md written with falsifiable requirements, explicit boundaries, and acceptance criteria
- SPEC.md committed atomically
- User knows they can now run /gsd-discuss-phase which will load SPEC.md automatically
</success_criteria>
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!