Aggregate all detected errors and gaps into the final verification report, apply strict accept/reject logic, and produce repair hints when rejected.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add frenzymath/Danus --skill synthesize-verification-report --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Synthesize Verification Report?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/frenzymath-synthesize-verification-report)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: synthesize-verification-report
description: Aggregate all detected errors and gaps into the final verification report, apply strict accept/reject logic, and produce repair hints when rejected.
---
# Synthesize Verification Report
Produce the final verification output JSON and verdict.
## Input Contract
Aggregate all findings you produced earlier in this verification session — the
per-item records from the sequential check and the reference check, held in
context. Each issue must include `location` and `issue`.
## Procedure
1. Collect all critical errors and all gaps from previous checks.
2. Build a complete `verification_report` object with:
- `summary`
- `critical_errors`
- `gaps`
3. Apply strict verdict rule:
- `correct` iff `critical_errors=[]` and `gaps=[]`.
- otherwise `wrong`.
4. If verdict is `wrong`, produce concrete non-empty `repair_hints`.
5. Self-check the JSON against its schema before emitting — do this by reasoning, not by calling a tool:
- `verdict` is exactly `"correct"` or `"wrong"`,
- `repair_hints` is non-empty **iff** `verdict == "wrong"` (empty string when `"correct"`),
- every entry of `critical_errors` and `gaps` has both `location` and `issue`,
- the verdict is consistent with the rule in step 3 (any critical error or gap forces `"wrong"`).
If the self-check fails, correct the object before continuing.
6. Write the final JSON to the run's result file and emit it as your final message.
The verify service injects the absolute path for this run — write to
`results/{run_id}/verification.json` under the service-provided run directory
(`{run_id}` is the `Run_id` given to you). The verify service reads this file
back and returns it verbatim as the HTTP `/verify` response; you invoke no MCP
tool to persist it. Stop only after the file is written and the same JSON is
your final message.
## Output Contract
Final output JSON:
```json
{
"verification_report": {
"summary": "string",
"critical_errors": [],
"gaps": []
},
"verdict": "correct",
"repair_hints": ""
}
```
If there is any error or gap, verdict must be `"wrong"` and `repair_hints` must be non-empty.
## Tools
- None — you build, self-check, and write the report by reasoning. The final JSON
is written to `results/{run_id}/verification.json`; the verify service returns it
as the `/verify` response.
(The verdict is the verifier's only output — no memory is written; the worker does
all writing to global memory and the fact graph.)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!