Skip to content
Back to skills

Synthesize Verification Report

ASecurity

Aggregate all detected errors and gaps into the final verification report, apply strict accept/reject logic, and produce repair hints when rejected.

  • 389 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 5, 2026
ai-agents

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 5, 2026

npx -y skills add frenzymath/Danus --skill synthesize-verification-report --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Synthesize Verification Report?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Synthesize Verification Report
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/frenzymath-synthesize-verification-report/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/frenzymath-synthesize-verification-report)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: synthesize-verification-report
description: Aggregate all detected errors and gaps into the final verification report, apply strict accept/reject logic, and produce repair hints when rejected.
---

# Synthesize Verification Report

Produce the final verification output JSON and verdict.

## Input Contract

Aggregate all findings you produced earlier in this verification session — the
per-item records from the sequential check and the reference check, held in
context. Each issue must include `location` and `issue`.

## Procedure

1. Collect all critical errors and all gaps from previous checks.
2. Build a complete `verification_report` object with:
   - `summary`
   - `critical_errors`
   - `gaps`
3. Apply strict verdict rule:
   - `correct` iff `critical_errors=[]` and `gaps=[]`.
   - otherwise `wrong`.
4. If verdict is `wrong`, produce concrete non-empty `repair_hints`.
5. Self-check the JSON against its schema before emitting — do this by reasoning, not by calling a tool:
   - `verdict` is exactly `"correct"` or `"wrong"`,
   - `repair_hints` is non-empty **iff** `verdict == "wrong"` (empty string when `"correct"`),
   - every entry of `critical_errors` and `gaps` has both `location` and `issue`,
   - the verdict is consistent with the rule in step 3 (any critical error or gap forces `"wrong"`).
   If the self-check fails, correct the object before continuing.
6. Write the final JSON to the run's result file and emit it as your final message.
   The verify service injects the absolute path for this run — write to
   `results/{run_id}/verification.json` under the service-provided run directory
   (`{run_id}` is the `Run_id` given to you). The verify service reads this file
   back and returns it verbatim as the HTTP `/verify` response; you invoke no MCP
   tool to persist it. Stop only after the file is written and the same JSON is
   your final message.

## Output Contract

Final output JSON:

```json
{
  "verification_report": {
    "summary": "string",
    "critical_errors": [],
    "gaps": []
  },
  "verdict": "correct",
  "repair_hints": ""
}
```

If there is any error or gap, verdict must be `"wrong"` and `repair_hints` must be non-empty.

## Tools

- None — you build, self-check, and write the report by reasoning. The final JSON
  is written to `results/{run_id}/verification.json`; the verify service returns it
  as the `/verify` response.

(The verdict is the verifier's only output — no memory is written; the worker does
all writing to global memory and the fact graph.)

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml325 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.