Generate and analyze simpler examples that satisfy both the assumptions and the conclusion of a theorem statement or subgoal. Use when you are stuck in reasoning and need simpler examples to regain traction, or when you want to see where the assumptions take effect and gain intuition.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add frenzymath/Danus --skill construct-toy-examples --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Construct Toy Examples?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/frenzymath-construct-toy-examples)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: construct-toy-examples
description: Generate and analyze simpler examples that satisfy both the assumptions and the conclusion of a theorem statement or subgoal. Use when you are stuck in reasoning and need simpler examples to regain traction, or when you want to see where the assumptions take effect and gain intuition.
---
# Construct Toy Examples
Use this skill when the agent is stuck in reasoning and needs simpler examples that satisfy both the assumptions and the conclusion in order to understand why the statement works.
## Input Contract
Read:
- current statement/subgoal
- relevant `immediate_conclusions`
- relevant `counterexamples` and failed branch notes
- relevant background/results when available
## Procedure
1. Construct simpler cases (low degree, small dimension, special forms, canonical objects).
2. Ensure the toy example satisfies all assumptions of the target statement or subgoal.
3. Check that the conclusion also holds in the toy example.
4. Study where each assumption takes effect and what mechanism makes the conclusion true.
5. Identify repeated patterns, invariants, or proof ideas suggested by the example.
6. Use search/reasoning/decomposition as needed to find examples or simplify the situation.
## Output Contract
Publish each toy example to global memory with `gm_add` (kind `example`):
`claim` = what the example shows, `evidence` = the construction, plus these fields:
```json
{
"example": "...",
"why_relevant": "...",
"assumptions_satisfied": ["..."],
"conclusion_verified": true,
"where_assumptions_take_effect": "...",
"observed_pattern": "...",
"supports_branch_ids": ["optional"],
"subgoal_id": "optional"
}
```
## Tools
- `gm_add` (publish the example finding)
- `gm_search` (recall related findings)
- `search_arxiv_theorems` for matching examples/known motifs
- Codex built-in web search for known example families and standard constructions
- use `$search-math-results` when broader retrieval is needed
## Failure Logging
If generated examples are inconclusive, append an `events` record:
- `event_type="toy_examples_inconclusive"`
- include attempted example families
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!