Recommends the skill or flow that fits the user's situation. A router over the skills in this repo. Use when the user asks which skill to use, is unsure what fits, or needs a pointer to the right workflow.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add FradSer/dotclaude --skill ask-matt --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ask Matt?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fradser-ask-matt)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ask-matt
description: Recommends the skill or flow that fits the user's situation. A router over the skills in this repo. Use when the user asks which skill to use, is unsure what fits, or needs a pointer to the right workflow.
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Ask Matt
You don't remember every skill, so ask.
A **flow** is a path through the skills. Most paths run along one **main flow**, and two **on-ramps** merge onto it. Everything else is standalone, or a vocabulary layer that runs underneath.
## The main flow: idea → ship
The route most work travels. You have an idea and want it built.
1. **`/mattpocock:grill-with-docs`** — sharpen the idea by interview. Start here when you **have a codebase**: it's stateful, retaining what it learns in `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs. (No codebase? Use `/mattpocock:grill-me` — see Standalone. Both run the same `/mattpocock:grilling` primitive; `grill-with-docs` is the one that leaves a paper trail.)
2. **Branch — can you settle every question in conversation?** If a question needs a runnable answer (state, business logic, a UI you have to see), detour through a prototype, bridged by **`/mattpocock:handoff`** in both directions (see Crossing sessions):
- **`/mattpocock:handoff`** out, then open a fresh session against that file,
- **`/mattpocock:prototype`** to answer the question with throwaway code,
- **`/mattpocock:handoff`** back what you learned, and reference it from the original idea thread.
3. **Branch — is this a multi-session build?**
- **Yes** → **`/mattpocock:to-spec`** (turn the thread into a spec), then **`/mattpocock:to-tickets`** to split it into tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its **blocking edges**. On a local tracker that's one file per ticket under `.scratch/<feature>/issues/`, worked blockers-first by hand; on a real tracker the edges become native blocking links, so any ticket whose blockers are done can be grabbed — kick off **`/mattpocock:implement`** per ticket, **clearing context between each one**.
- **No** → **`/mattpocock:implement`** right here, in the same context window.
Either way, **`/mattpocock:implement`** builds each issue by driving **`/mattpocock:bdd`** internally (Discovery → Formulation, then Automation delegated to `/mattpocock:tdd`) — one vertical slice at a time — then closes out by running **`/mattpocock:code-review`**, a two-axis review (Standards + Spec) of the diff, before committing. Reach for **`/mattpocock:bdd`** on its own when you want to define Gherkin scenarios for a feature, and **`/mattpocock:tdd`** on its own when you want to write tests within the BDD Automation phase. Reach for **`/mattpocock:code-review`** on its own whenever you want to review a branch or PR against a fixed point.
### Context hygiene
Keep steps 1–3 in **one unbroken context window** — don't compact or clear until after `/mattpocock:to-tickets` — so the grilling, spec, and tickets all build on the same thinking. Each `/mattpocock:implement` then starts fresh, working from the ticket.
The limit on this is the **[smart zone](https://www.aihero.dev/ai-coding-dictionary/smart-zone)**: the window (~120k tokens on state-of-the-art models) within which the model still reasons sharply. If a session approaches it before `/mattpocock:to-tickets`, don't push on degraded — `/mattpocock:handoff` and continue in a fresh thread.
## CRITICAL: Route by scenario, not by habit
Wayfinder is only for work too big for one session — never a well-scoped feature. Triage is only for issues the user didn't create — never for the tickets `/mattpocock:to-tickets` produced. Keep steps 1–3 in one unbroken context window: no compact or clear until after `/mattpocock:to-tickets`.
## On-ramps
A starting situation that generates work, then merges onto the main flow.
- **Bugs and requests piling up** → **`/mattpocock:triage`**. It moves issues through triage roles and produces agent-ready issues, which **`/mattpocock:implement`** later picks up.
Triage is only for issues **you didn't create** — bug reports, incoming feature requests, anything that arrives raw. Tickets that `/mattpocock:to-tickets` produced are already agent-ready, so **don't triage them**.
- **Something's broken** → **`/mattpocock:diagnosing-bugs`**. For the hard ones: the bug that resists a first glance, the intermittent flake, the regression that crept in between two known-good states. It refuses to theorise until it has a **tight feedback loop** — one command that already goes red on *this* bug — then fixes with a regression test. Its post-mortem hands off to **`/mattpocock:improve-codebase-architecture`** when the real finding is that there's no good seam to lock the bug down.
- **A huge, foggy effort — a greenfield project or a huge feature build, too big for one session** → **`/mattpocock:wayfinder`**, the most cognitively demanding flow here. When the way from here to the destination isn't visible yet, it charts a **shared map** of **decision tickets** on the issue tracker and resolves them one at a time — producing **decisions, not deliverables** — until the fog is pushed back and the way is clear. Where **`/mattpocock:grill-with-docs`** sharpens an idea you can hold in one session, wayfinder is for the idea you can't — and it's slower and denser, so save it for exactly that, never a well-scoped feature.
When the map clears, **it hands off, it doesn't build**: merge onto the main flow at **`/mattpocock:to-spec`**, which collapses the map's linked decisions into a buildable plan, then `/mattpocock:to-tickets` and `/mattpocock:implement` as usual. Looping the map straight into `/mattpocock:implement` skips that collapse and throws the linked detail away — go straight to `/mattpocock:implement` only when the effort turned out genuinely small.
## Codebase health
Not feature work — upkeep.
- **`/mattpocock:improve-codebase-architecture`** — run whenever you have a spare moment to keep the codebase good for agents to operate in. It surfaces **deepening opportunities**; picking one _generates an idea_ you can take into the main flow at `/mattpocock:grill-with-docs`. It's the survey that finds the candidates; **`/mattpocock:codebase-design`** (below) is the bench you design the chosen one on.
## Vocabulary underneath
Model-invoked references that run *beneath* the other skills — each the single source of truth for its vocabulary. Reach for them directly when the **words**, not the process, are the problem; or let the skills above pull them in.
- **`/mattpocock:codebase-design`** — the deep-module vocabulary (module, interface, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality) for designing a module's *shape*: a lot of behaviour behind a small interface at a clean seam. `/mattpocock:bdd`, `/mattpocock:tdd` (BDD-driven), and `/mattpocock:improve-codebase-architecture` all speak it.
- **`/mattpocock:domain-modeling`** — sharpen the project's *domain* language: challenge a fuzzy term, resolve an overloaded word ("account" doing three jobs), record a hard-to-reverse decision as an ADR. It's the active discipline `/mattpocock:grill-with-docs` drives to keep `CONTEXT.md` a clean glossary.
## Crossing sessions
A **phase** is a chunk of work inside a session — the grilling, the implementation, the QA. At the **boundary** between two of them you have five options, and picking between them is the fuzziest decision in this whole map:
- **Continue** — stay put. Costs nothing, loses nothing.
- **`/clear`** — empty the window, when nothing here matters to what's next.
- **`/mattpocock:handoff`** — write a portable markdown file. Narrow: only for a **new harness**, a **new directory**, a **colleague**, or forking a side task **mid-phase**. What it buys is portability. It's the bridge between context windows, in either direction.
- **Subagent** — send a tightly-scoped task to its own window and get a report back.
- **`/compact`** (built-in) — compress this context and seed a fresh session with it. The **default**, at the bottom of the tree rather than the first reach.
Read [PHASE-BOUNDARIES.md](PHASE-BOUNDARIES.md) for the ordered tree — the five questions, the reasoning behind each branch, and why the primary-source cost makes **Continue** the one to rule out first. Make the decision **at** a boundary; mid-phase, continue or split the rest into subagents. `/mattpocock:handoff` forks; `/compact` continues.
## Standalone
Off the main flow entirely.
- **`/mattpocock:grill-me`** — the same relentless interview as `/mattpocock:grill-with-docs`, but for when you have **no codebase**. Stateless: it saves nothing locally, builds no `CONTEXT.md`. Reach for it to sharpen any plan or design that doesn't live in a repo.
- **`/mattpocock:grilling`** — the interview primitive itself: one question at a time via the AskUserQuestion tool, facts are the agent's job and decisions are yours. `/mattpocock:grill-me` and `/mattpocock:grill-with-docs` are the two named ways in, and `/mattpocock:triage`, `/mattpocock:wayfinder` and `/mattpocock:improve-codebase-architecture` all run it internally. Reach for it directly only when you want the interview with no wrapper around it.
- **`/mattpocock:resolving-merge-conflicts`** — work an in-progress merge or rebase conflict hunk by hunk, resolving by **intent** traced to each side's primary source rather than by picking lines, then finish the operation. It never runs `--abort`. Standalone and off every flow: reach for it when you are already mid-conflict.
- **`/mattpocock:prototype`** — a small, throwaway program that answers one design question: does this state model feel right, or what should this UI look like. It's the detour in step 2 of the main flow, but reach for it any time a design question is hard to settle on paper.
- **`/mattpocock:research`** — delegate reading legwork to a **background agent**: it investigates a question against **primary sources**, then leaves a cited Markdown file in the repo. Keep working while it reads. The file it produces is something to take *into* the main flow at `/mattpocock:grill-with-docs` — research feeds the thinking, it doesn't replace it.
- **`/mattpocock:to-questionnaire`** — when the thing blocking you isn't in your head or the codebase but in **someone else's**, this writes them a questionnaire to fill in. It's the inverse of `/mattpocock:grill-me`: instead of interviewing you about the subject, it interviews you about the **send** — who it's going to, what you need back — and aims the questions at the gap. What comes back is material for `/mattpocock:grill-with-docs` or `/mattpocock:to-spec`.
- **`/mattpocock:wizard`** — for the steps only a **human** can take: provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, clicking through an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, running a one-off migration or cutover. It generates an interactive bash script that opens each URL, captures each value, and writes it into `.env` and GitHub secrets — so the procedure stops being something you re-explain to an agent every time. Model-invoked, so the agent reaches for it the moment it hits a wall only you can pass. If the agent could just do it itself, it should; this is for where a human is genuinely in the loop.
- **`/mattpocock:wait-what`** — the corrective for a message that didn't land. Use it mid-conversation, inside any other skill, and the agent re-pitches what it just said with the context you were missing, in plain English, using the `CONTEXT.md` vocabulary. It works after the fact; `/mattpocock:grill-with-docs` is the upfront cure, because a shared language agreed early is what stops the jargon arriving at all.
- **`/mattpocock:teach`** — learn a concept over multiple sessions, using the current directory as a stateful workspace.
- **`/mattpocock:writing-for-agents`** — reference for writing documents agents consume: skills, `AGENTS.md`/`CLAUDE.md`, pointed-at docs.
- **`/mattpocock:writing-great-skills`** — reference for writing and editing skills well.
- **`/mattpocock:bdd`** — the BDD lifecycle: Discovery → Formulation → Automation (delegated to `/mattpocock:tdd`). Reach for it directly when you want to define feature behavior via Gherkin scenarios.
- **`/mattpocock:tdd`** — the BDD-driven Automation phase: test quality, seams, mocking, anti-patterns, and the red-green loop rules. Reach for it directly when you want to write or improve tests during BDD implementation.
## Precondition
**`/mattpocock:setup-matt-pocock-skills`** — run before your first engineering flow to configure the issue tracker, triage labels, and doc layout the other skills assume. Custom issue trackers also work.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!