Build process. The person names a skill they heard of — in an ad, a post, a video, from a friend («I heard about replica-skill») — or gives its link: find it, judge it the catalog's way, answer with curiosity, and after their yes keep it in the node's own skills «for later» (searched first) or hand the checked copy to the element's own agent now, marked «suggested by the person». Also when they say «смотри, интересный навык, может пригодится».
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Sponsors
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Know which skills are safe — weekly.
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Is that skill safe to install?
Are you the author of Adopt Suggested Skill?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fractera-adopt-suggested-skill)
---
name: adopt-suggested-skill
description: "Build process. The person names a skill they heard of — in an ad, a post, a video, from a friend («I heard about replica-skill») — or gives its link: find it, judge it the catalog's way, answer with curiosity, and after their yes keep it in the node's own skills «for later» (searched first) or hand the checked copy to the element's own agent now, marked «suggested by the person». Also when they say «смотри, интересный навык, может пригодится»."
---
# A skill the person suggests
**Process: build** — it ends with a commit in an element, made by that element's own agent; you find, judge, ask and hand over.
A hint, not a law: models of late 2026 work worse under rigid step-by-step instructions.
## Why
The owner of the node, 2026-11-03: «я услышал бы рекламе про навык, например replica-skill для продвинутого реверса инжиниринга с
дополнительными возможностями. И должен уметь найти этот навык дать ему оценку и добавить в проект пользователя … с пометкой навык по
предложению пользователя»; «можно найти навыки которых много с похожим названием» — so ask for the link where they saw it. Who installs:
«Агент элемента» — the element's own agent, never you. The judging is the catalog's (627): the whole folder, scripts read, risks,
value, use, quality, the partners' audits — and the repository's own history, because a skill from an ad can be loud and young.
## How
1. **Find it:** `npm run skills -- adopt "<name or link>" --said "<their words>"`.
- `===SKILLS_ADOPT_CANDIDATES===` — several repositories answer to the name: show the two to four likeliest (stars, installs, last
update) and ask where they heard of it — the link to the ad, the post, the video or the repository. A post you read yourself; a
video only by its page and description. Then the same command with `--pick <owner/repo>`.
- `===SKILLS_ADOPT_NONE===` — ask for the link; never guess a repository.
- `===SKILLS_ADOPT_MANY===` — a large repository: ask which skills (`--skill <name>`), or judge them all with `--all` after their yes
(each skill is one marker call on their subscription).
2. **Answer** (`===SKILLS_ADOPT_JUDGED===`) in the instruction's «curiosity first» voice — short and living, in their language:
- the trust signals first when there are flags («31 days old, one commit, 7,203 stars in a month — loud from an ad, not proven by
time»);
- each skill worth a look in one line: its name, the stars of its repository, its installs, what it brings, how it is used; the
outside service or key it needs, if any;
- what the node already has («the node already has: …») — say plainly when the skill repeats it;
- what is not taken and why: risks (named), a cloud place to keep or run things («against the node's local-first rule»), no value;
- your recommendation — which skills, into which element — and the question.
3. **After their yes** — two roads, by their words:
- **«for later»** («смотри, интересный навык, может пригодится», no element named, no task now): `npm run skills -- keep
<owner/repo>@<skill> --said "<their words>"` — the checked folder goes into the node's own skills with its vectors, no element gets
it; from now on `skills_find` shows it FIRST, «your skill», whenever a request fits (node step 640, the owner: «чтобы он был
приоритете над основным числом других навыков»). `npm run skills -- own` lists them, `forget <id>` removes one.
- **into an element now:** `npm run skills -- hand <owner/repo>@<skill> --to <element> --send` (a kept skill is handed the same way,
any time later; so is a catalog skill `skills_find` proposed — from Fractera's store, checked file by file).
A skill with scripts — name the scripts and get a separate yes first (`--scripts-yes`). `===SKILLS_KEEP_FAIL===` /
`===SKILLS_HAND_FAIL===`: «the folder changed after the check» — judge it again; «skip» — it is not kept or installed, say why;
«embeddings did not count» — the vectors element is off, nothing was kept (`npm run power -- embeddings on`).
4. **Tell them** where it went: kept — «it is in the node's own skills, I will offer it first when it fits»; handed — the element's agent takes the checked copy from the core, installs it with its `SOURCE.md` («Origin:
suggested by the person») and commits; its report comes back to you (`npm run state -- <element>`).
A kept **design** skill (step 711, the owner 2026-11-09: «он будет сохранён в коллекции ваших навыков и в любой момент … примените
его как к новому элементу … так и при необходимости к редизайну уже существующих») — add one line: it now shows in every
element's «Build → Design» tab (its search reads their own collection first), where they test it as a prototype page and pin it.
## Never
- write into an element's folder yourself — its own agent installs from the checked copy;
- install a skill with risks, or a copy whose fingerprint changed after the check;
- send the person's words or files anywhere but the searches and the marker.