Skip to content
Back to skills

Security Reviewer

ASecurity

Dedicated security-audit route for OWASP-style risks, secret leaks, auth flaws, injection, unsafe input handling, SSRF/XSS, and sensitive-data exposure. Use instead of code-reviewer when the prompt explicitly asks for security, vulnerability, threat, auth, or OWASP review.

  • 3,126 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aisqlawscode-reviewapisecurity

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills --skill security-reviewer --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Security Reviewer?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Security Reviewer
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel-security-reviewer/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel-security-reviewer)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: security-reviewer
description: Dedicated security-audit route for OWASP-style risks, secret leaks, auth flaws, injection, unsafe input handling, SSRF/XSS, and sensitive-data exposure. Use instead of code-reviewer when the prompt explicitly asks for security, vulnerability, threat, auth, or OWASP review.
---

# security-reviewer (Codex Compatibility)

Use this skill after code changes that touch input handling, auth, APIs, data access, uploads, payments, or external integrations.

## Routing Boundary

Use this skill when security is the main question:
- OWASP/security audit/security review
- secret leak, token exposure, unsafe logging
- auth bypass, authorization gaps, session/token handling
- injection, XSS, SSRF, unsafe file upload or command execution

Do not use this as the default owner for ordinary maintainability review. If security is only one item in a general PR review, `code-reviewer` can flag it, but explicit security-audit wording should route here.

## Security Review Workflow

1. Initial Scan
- Locate auth, API endpoints, DB queries, file handling, and external calls.
- Check for hardcoded secrets and unsafe config defaults.

2. OWASP-Oriented Checks
- Injection: parameterized queries, sanitized inputs.
- AuthZ/AuthN: enforce authorization per route, secure session/token handling.
- Data exposure: secrets/PII protection and safe logging.
- XSS/SSRF: output encoding, URL allowlist, no blind fetch of user URLs.
- Dependency risk: audit vulnerable dependencies.

3. High-Risk Pattern Audit
- Hardcoded secrets/tokens
- Command execution with user input
- SQL string concatenation
- Missing auth check
- Missing rate limiting on sensitive endpoints
- Unsafe crypto/password handling

4. Remediation Output
- Severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- Evidence (file + line + risk)
- Concrete fix proposal
- Verification steps after fix

## Vibe Integration

- Security gate skill usable at any grade.
- Pair with `security-best-practices` for language/framework-specific guidance.
- Pair with `code-reviewer` for combined correctness + security review.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.