Build the research package — BibTeX citations, related work, evidence matrix, paper outline, reproducibility bundle, and experiment data. Use when the user wants publication materials or a research write-up bundle.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add forger-labs-hq/researchforge --skill researchforge-paper --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Researchforge Paper?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/forger-labs-hq-researchforge-paper)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: researchforge-paper
description: Build the research package — BibTeX citations, related work, evidence matrix, paper outline, reproducibility bundle, and experiment data. Use when the user wants publication materials or a research write-up bundle.
---
# Build the research package
```bash
researchforge paper package --json
```
Requires stored papers (run the researchforge-papers skill first). Output
goes to `.researchforge/research-output/` by default; `--output DIR` writes
elsewhere (only with the user's say-so — it creates a directory in their
tree).
The bundle (all generated from recorded data only):
- `citations.bib`, `related_work.md`, `evidence_matrix.csv` — from stored
papers and the landscape's evidence claims;
- `hypotheses.md`, `paper_outline.md` — the outline marks every section that
has no recorded data as *to be completed by the author*; leave those
honest, do not fill them with invented content;
- `methodology.md`, `limitations.md`, `reproducibility.md` — frozen
contract, environment fingerprint, exact command sequence, patch hashes;
- `experiments/` — `results.csv`, `run_manifest.json`, and
`rejected_experiments.md` (negative results are part of the record);
- `figures/README.md` — figures are not auto-generated; say so if asked.
When presenting the package, describe what each file contains using the
`--json` file list, and remind the user the outline is a starting point for
*their* paper: the recorded evidence supports it, but the prose and any
novelty claims are theirs to make.
## Rules
- The Python engine is the boundary: never work around a validation error, a
protected path, or an approval gate — fix the artifact or ask the user.
- Approvals belong to the user: never pass `--yes` or type a confirmation
unless the user explicitly approved that step in this conversation.
- Ground every summary in stored data: quote only numbers returned by
`--json` output or files under `.researchforge/` — never invent metrics.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!