Harmonia flow - run a pinned task through plan, implement, and review in one unattended pass, stopping at human acceptance. Use ONLY when explicitly invoked as /harmonia:flow.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add foliveira/harmonia --skill flow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Flow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/foliveira-flow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: flow
description: Harmonia flow - run a pinned task through plan, implement, and review in one unattended pass, stopping at human acceptance. Use ONLY when explicitly invoked as /harmonia:flow.
---
Your working contract is the 4 rules; their digest is injected at session start - read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/RULES.md` in full only if that digest is not in your context.
Read the plan, implement, and review stages from `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/lifecycle.yaml` - their artifacts and gates are authoritative and define the transitions below; do not hardcode them. This runner is a meta-command, not a lifecycle stage: it holds no stage logic of its own and hardcodes no agent list. Each stage's own SKILL.md owns its orchestration - agents, the red-green loop, the panel, the gates - so execute those procedures and never restate them (R9).
Span: plan, then implement, then review, in one unattended session. Discuss stays manual because it is dialogic - the scoper and rubber-duck question the developer, so it cannot run unattended - and acceptance stays manual under the human-only gate. The runner chains neither.
1. Entry gate - require a pinned scope that carries criteria: `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/workspace.sh resolve --repo .` to locate the active workspace (never mint; on ambiguity or no-active-task, surface the script's message and stop). If the resolved workspace has no `scope.md`, refuse and point the developer to `/harmonia:discuss` - the runner starts from an already-pinned scope and never mints or auto-scopes. With `scope.md` present, gate its criteria before any work: run `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/check-criteria.sh --workspace <resolved-workspace> --repo .` and halt on a non-zero exit - a criteria-less or non-machine-checkable scope is refused up front and pointed to `/harmonia:discuss`, the same refusal as the no-scope path (the check writes a status-validated `receipts/check-criteria.json`; the implement gate re-runs it, redundant but harmless). With scope and criteria confirmed, clear this run's stale prior-run output before any transition runs by calling `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/workspace.sh clear-span --repo .`; the subcommand names the span out-artifacts and confines the removal to the resolved workspace, so this runner no longer restates that file list (it lives in `bin/workspace.sh`, exercised by `tests/workspace.bats`). `scope.md` is the pinned input and is never removed.
2. Plan: execute the plan stage per `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/plan/SKILL.md`. Scope is present, so the scoper consumes and refines it and never re-mints (R31). Before advancing, confirm the plan stage wrote its `design.md` out-artifact to the workspace; if it did not, halt and hand back.
3. Implement: execute the implement stage per `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/implement/SKILL.md`. Its pre-implement gate runs `check-criteria`. Inspect that gate's signal directly: halt when `receipts/check-criteria.json` records a `status` other than `pass`, or when `check-criteria` exits non-zero. On that signal the criteria are not machine-checkable, so implement writes no code - a stop before any work begins, unlike the review halt in step 5 which stops after the work with `verdict.md` and `gate-report.md` already on disk. Halt and hand back with the failing-criteria report and its receipt (`receipts/check-criteria.json`); do not advance.
4. Advance to review - unconditional: once the implement stage has written its `boundary.md` and `diff-summary.md` out-artifacts, advance to review whether the red-green loop completed or exited incomplete at its `max_rounds` cap. The cap is not a gate failure; the loop records the disagreement in the workspace for the review lead to arbitrate. Do not inspect the coverage result to decide advancing.
5. Review: execute the review stage per `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/review/SKILL.md`. Take its `verdict.md` as authoritative. Halt on a failing review gate: if the verdict is not a pass because a coverage, criteria-run, or receipts gate failed, or because a test-immutability violation was recorded, stop and hand back with `verdict.md` and `gate-report.md` on disk. Never record a coverage override to keep going, and never override the lead's verdict.
6. Stop before capture - hand back: the runner ends after review. It never writes the `accepted` marker and never runs `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/workspace.sh accept` - acceptance is a human act. Never run accept on the developer's behalf. Hand back a summary telling the developer to exercise the built behavior, record acceptance via `/harmonia:accept`, then invoke `/harmonia:capture` as a separate manual act. The runner never enters capture.
Pass workspace paths, not prose recaps (R8). Orchestrate only (R9).
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!