Skip to content
Back to skills

Beamer Deck

ASecurity

Create an academic presentation as a LaTeX Beamer source and reviewed PDF with an original theme. Use when the requested deliverable is a conference, seminar, or lecture deck in Beamer. Not for PowerPoint or RevealJS; use $pptx or $quarto-deck.

  • 144 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 23, 2026
ai-agentspythongobashaws

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 23, 2026

npx -y skills add flonat/flonat-research --skill beamer-deck --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Beamer Deck?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Beamer Deck
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/flonat-beamer-deck/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/flonat-beamer-deck)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: beamer-deck
description: "Create an academic presentation as a LaTeX Beamer source and reviewed PDF with an original theme. Use when the requested deliverable is a conference, seminar, or lecture deck in Beamer. Not for PowerPoint or RevealJS; use $pptx or $quarto-deck."
allowed-tools: Bash(latexmk*), Bash(xelatex*), Bash(pdflatex*), Bash(biber*), Bash(bibtex*), Bash(mkdir*), Bash(ls*), Bash(R*), Bash(Rscript*), Bash(uv:*), Read, Write, Edit, Task
argument-hint: "[topic, content-path, or project-name]"
skill-dependencies: [latex, project-deck]
---

# Beamer Deck Skill

> Generate academic Beamer presentations with original themes, rhetoric-driven structure, and multi-agent review. Internalises Scott Cunningham's rhetoric framework and implements an adversarial review workflow.

## Purpose

Create polished, zero-warning Beamer decks for academic contexts: seminars, conference talks, teaching lectures, and working decks for coauthors. Every deck gets a custom theme, assertion-driven titles, and parallel review by rhetoric and graphics sub-agents.

**NOT for project status updates** — use `project-deck` for those.

## When to Use

- Academic seminar presentations
- Conference talks (15–45 min)
- Teaching lectures (undergraduate or PhD)
- Working decks for coauthors or supervisors
- Any presentation that needs rhetoric discipline and visual quality

---

## Critical Rules

1. **Build artifacts go to `out/`, PDF stays in the source directory.** Use the `latex` pre-flight to install the fail-closed canonical `.latexmkrc`; never hand-write a partial config or copy block. Use `latex` for compilation and engine resolution.
2. **Python:** Always use `uv run python`. Never bare `python`, `python3`, `pip`, or `pip3`.
2. **Fix ALL warnings.** Overfull hbox, underfull hbox, overfull vbox, underfull vbox — no matter how small. Parse the `.log` file. Recompile until clean.
3. **Titles are assertions, not labels.** "Distance increases abortion rates" — not "Results". Every frame title states a claim.
4. **One idea per slide.** Not a guideline. A law. If a slide has two ideas, split it.
5. **Use the unified template.** Always use `\usepackage[<institution>]{user-beamer}` from `templates/beamer/`. Options: `preset-a`, `preset-b`, `preset-c`, `preset-d`, `plain`. Never use default Beamer themes (Warsaw, Madrid, etc.) as-is, and never create one-off preambles. See [`templates/beamer/README.md`] for available custom commands and how to add institutions.
6. **Code-first figures.** Generate figures via R or Python scripts before inserting. Never use placeholder images. **Always save the script alongside the figures** — never generate a figure without preserving the code that created it.
7. **If a `.bib` file is used, validate it.** Cross-reference all `\cite{}` keys against the bibliography file. See `bib-validate` for the full protocol.
8. **Never define parameterized TikZ styles inside a frame.** `#` inside a Beamer frame body is consumed by the frame parser before TikZ sees it, producing `Illegal parameter number` errors that cascade and resist all downstream fixes. Define ALL `\tikzset{...}` and `.style={..., #1}` entries in the preamble; use them inside frames. See [`../shared/tikz-rules.md`](../shared/tikz-rules.md) Rule 11.

---

## Rhetoric Principles

Full framework (Three Laws, MB/MC, Aristotelian Triad, Narrative Arc, Pyramid Principle, Devil's Advocate): [`../shared/rhetoric-principles.md`](../shared/rhetoric-principles.md)

Scott's original essay: `resources/academics/scott-cunningham/MixtapeTools/presentations/rhetoric_of_decks.md`

---

## Quality Scoring

Apply numeric quality scoring using the shared framework and skill-specific rubric:

- **Framework:** [`../shared/quality-scoring.md`](../shared/quality-scoring.md) — severity tiers, thresholds, verdict rules
- **Rubric:** [`references/quality-rubric.md`](references/quality-rubric.md) — issue-to-deduction mappings for this skill

Start at 100, deduct per issue found, apply verdict. Compute the score in Phase 7 and report it in the final output.

## Context-Specific Guidance

See [`../shared/rhetoric-principles.md`](../shared/rhetoric-principles.md) for the full Aristotelian Triad framework. Context-specific Ethos/Pathos/Logos balance and adjustments are applied in Phase 2 based on audience type (academic seminar, conference talk, teaching lecture, working deck).

---

## Workflow: 7 Phases

```
You (orchestrator)
├── Phase 1: Gather context        (direct)
├── Phase 2: Design structure       (direct)
├── Phase 3: Build deck             (direct)
├── Phase 4: Fix all warnings       (direct)
├── Phase 5: Rhetoric review        (sub-agent — Explore)
├── Phase 6: Graphics review        (sub-agent — Explore)  ← parallel with Phase 5
└── Phase 7: Apply & finalise       (direct)
```

### Phase 1: Gather Context (Direct)

Read project files, content sources, and audience brief. Ask the user clarifying questions:

- **Audience**: Who is this for? (seminar, conference, teaching, coauthors)
- **Duration**: How long is the talk?
- **Content source**: Paper draft? Notes? Existing slides? Code output?
- **Special requirements**: Specific figures, institutional branding, language?

Check for existing `.bib` files in the project. If citations are needed, note this for Phase 3.

### Phase 2: Design Structure (Direct)

1. **Choose rhetoric balance** based on audience (see table above)
2. **Outline slide sequence** with assertion titles — write each title as a claim
3. **Plan narrative arc** — consult `docs/reference/talk-design.md` for format-specific arcs (empirical, structural, theory, descriptive) and audience calibration
4. **Choose institution option** for `user-beamer` — colours and fonts are set by the template
5. **Identify figures needed** — which need to be generated via code?

Present the outline to the user for approval before building.

### Phase 3: Build Deck (Direct)

1. **Generate figures first** — run R/Python scripts, save to `figures/`
2. **Write `.tex` file** using the unified template: `\documentclass[aspectratio=169,11pt]{beamer}` + `\usepackage[university]{user-beamer}` (or other institution option). Use `\fbinstitute` and `\fbemail` for metadata. Custom commands: `\contribcard`, `\phasecircle`, `\accentbox`, `\highlightbox`, `standoutframe` environment.
3. **Use 16:9 aspect ratio** (already in the documentclass above)
4. **Install the canonical `.latexmkrc`** through the `latex` pre-flight if it is missing; classify any divergent existing config before migration
5. **Compile using `latex`** — this handles missing packages, font conflicts, citation key mismatches, and stale cache automatically
6. **If using citations**: add `\addbibresource{references.bib}` or `\bibliography{}` as appropriate

### Phase 4: Fix All Warnings (Direct)

After `latex` resolves errors, address remaining **warnings** (which autofix does not fix):

1. Parse `out/*.log` for overfull/underfull hbox/vbox warnings
2. Fix every single one — adjust text, resize figures, tweak `\parbox`, etc.
3. Recompile
4. Repeat until the log is clean

**Circuit breaker — do not spiral.** If the same compile error persists after **3 different fix attempts**, STOP. Do not try a fourth approach. Instead:

1. Stop editing the `.tex` file.
2. Quote the exact error line from the `.log`.
3. List the 3 approaches tried and why each failed.
4. Ask the user how to proceed.

What counts as "the same error": any error that persists at the same line family after a fix (e.g., `Illegal parameter number` moving from line 568 to 572 is still the same error — that is the diagnostic signature in tikz-rules.md Rule 11). A fresh Overfull on a different slide after fixing the first is a *new* error — reset the counter.

The cost of stopping is 2 minutes; the cost of spiraling is an hour of edits that progressively obscure the original cause. This rule overrides "recompile until clean" — zero tolerance for warnings does not mean infinite attempts on the same fix.

**"Compilation success does not mean visual success."** Also check for silent visual errors:
- TikZ: shape constraints forcing label misplacement, coordinate misalignment. **If the deck contains TikZ diagrams**, run the 6-pass verification from [`../shared/tikz-rules.md`](../shared/tikz-rules.md) — compute Bezier depths, check gaps, verify label fit, check shape boundary clearance.
- matplotlib/ggplot: axis labels cut off, legend obscuring data, text sizing. **If figures use curved arrows (`arc3`)**, compute Bézier positions using the helper functions in `../shared/tikz-rules.md` § Matplotlib Extension — never guess where curves pass. Check label-to-shape clearance (Boundary Rule) and use anchor-based centering for text pairs.
- **PDF visual inspection**: Run `uv run python scripts/pdf-to-images.py <deck>.pdf` to convert pages to images, then inspect each image for text overflow, element overlap, font readability, and alignment issues that are invisible in the log

### Phase 5: Rhetoric Review (Sub-Agent — Explore)

Launch a sub-agent to review the `.tex` file against 7 criteria: narrative arc, MB/MC balance, title quality, one-idea-per-slide, transitions, Aristotelian balance, and pyramid principle.

Full prompt template: [`references/review-prompts.md`](references/review-prompts.md) § Rhetoric Review

### Phase 6: Graphics Review (Sub-Agent — Explore)

Launch **in parallel with Phase 5**. Reviews TikZ diagrams, figure sizing, table formatting, colour consistency, typography, and numerical accuracy.

Full prompt template: [`references/review-prompts.md`](references/review-prompts.md) § Graphics Review

### Phase 7: Apply and Finalise (Direct)

1. Read both reviewer reports
2. Incorporate feedback — prioritise Critical and Needs Work items
3. Recompile
4. Verify zero warnings in the log
5. **If using a `.bib` file**: validate all `\cite{}` keys resolve correctly (check log for `Citation .* undefined`). See `bib-validate` for the full cross-referencing protocol.
6. If significant changes were made, loop back to Phase 5 for another review round
7. **Compute quality score** — read `references/quality-rubric.md`, log all issues from Phases 4-6, compute score and verdict
8. Confirm final PDF is in the source directory (copied from `out/` by `.latexmkrc`)

---

## Reference Palettes

Three starting palettes (Professional, Energetic, Academic) in both LaTeX and CSS formats: [`../shared/palettes.md`](../shared/palettes.md)

Use as inspiration — always create an original palette for each deck.

---

## Output Checklist

A completed deck directory should contain:

```
project/
├── deck.tex              # Main Beamer file (uses user-beamer.sty)
├── deck.pdf              # Compiled PDF (copied from out/ by .latexmkrc)
├── .latexmkrc            # Canonical build config
├── out/                  # Build artifacts only
├── figures/              # Generated figures (if any)
│   ├── figure_1.png
│   └── ...
├── scripts/              # R/Python scripts that generated figures (if any)
│   ├── figure_1.R
│   └── ...
└── references.bib        # Bibliography (if citations used)
```

- [ ] PDF compiles with zero warnings
- [ ] All frame titles are assertions
- [ ] One idea per slide
- [ ] Narrative arc: Problem → Investigation → Resolution
- [ ] Rhetoric review completed (Phase 5)
- [ ] Graphics review completed (Phase 6)
- [ ] If `.bib` used: all `\cite{}` keys validated (see `bib-validate`)
- [ ] Quality score computed and reported

---

## Cross-References

| Skill | When to use instead/alongside |
|-------|-------------------------------|
| `project-deck` | For project status updates (supervisor meetings, coauthor handoffs) |
| `latex` | **Default compiler** — used in Phase 3 for error resolution and citation audit |
| `latex` | For manual compilation config details, `.latexmkrc` setup, engine selection |
| `proofread` | For post-hoc review of text quality in the deck |
| `bib-validate` | For thorough bibliography cross-referencing when citations are used |
| `literature` | For finding and verifying citations to include |
| `quarto-deck` | For HTML presentations (teaching, informal talks) instead of PDF |
| `quarto-course` | For full course websites with multiple lectures, exercises, and navigation |

**Scott's full rhetoric essay:** `resources/academics/scott-cunningham/MixtapeTools/presentations/rhetoric_of_decks.md`
**Scott's deck generation prompt:** `resources/academics/scott-cunningham/MixtapeTools/presentations/create_deck_prompt.md`
**Scott's example decks:** `resources/academics/scott-cunningham/MixtapeTools/presentations/examples/`

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md12.5 KB
  • references/quality-rubric.md2.4 KB
  • references/review-prompts.md4.7 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.