Automated multi-agent orchestrator that spawns CLI subagents in parallel, coordinates via MCP Memory, and monitors progress. Use for orchestration, parallel execution, and automated multi-agent workflows.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add first-fluke/oh-my-agent --skill oma-orchestrator --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Oma Orchestrator?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/first-fluke-oma-orchestrator-oh-my-agent)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: oma-orchestrator
description: Automated multi-agent orchestrator that spawns CLI subagents in parallel, coordinates via MCP Memory, and monitors progress. Use for orchestration, parallel execution, and automated multi-agent workflows.
---
# Orchestrator - Automated Multi-Agent Coordinator
## Scheduling
### Goal
Automatically orchestrate multi-agent execution with task decomposition, native/fallback dispatch, memory coordination, progress monitoring, verification, QA cross-review, retry, and result collection.
### Intent signature
- User asks to orchestrate, run in parallel, automate multi-agent execution, or coordinate full-stack work end to end.
- Task requires multiple specialist agents and a persistent review/remediation loop.
### When to use
- Complex feature requires multiple specialized agents working in parallel
- User wants automated execution without manually spawning agents
- Full-stack implementation spanning backend, frontend, mobile, and QA
- User says "run it automatically", "run in parallel", or similar automation requests
### When NOT to use
- Simple single-domain task -> use the specific agent directly
- User wants step-by-step manual control -> use oma-coordination
- Quick bug fixes or minor changes
### Expected inputs
- Complex feature or workflow request
- Project config, model/vendor routing, agent types, task constraints, and workspace/session needs
- Acceptance criteria and verification expectations
### Expected outputs
- Orchestrator session state, task board, progress files, result files, and final summary
- Specialist agent outputs after mechanical checks, automated verify, and QA cross-review
- Review history and retry/remediation status when loops fail
### Dependencies
- `.agents/oma-config.yaml`, `.codex/agents/*.toml`, `.gemini/agents/*.md`, or fallback `oh-my-ag agent:spawn`
- Memory provider config, subagent prompt template, scripts, task templates, verify script, and session metrics
### Control-flow features
- Branches by vendor/native dispatch availability, priority tiers, agent completion/failure, verification status, QA verdict, retry limits, and clarification debt
- Spawns processes/agents and reads/writes memory/result files
- Blocks termination until persistent workflows complete
## Structural Flow
### Entry
1. Resolve agent vendor routing and runtime dispatch path.
2. Decompose request into priority-tiered tasks.
3. Create session memory and task board.
### Scenes
1. **PREPARE**: Plan, setup session ID, and initialize memory files.
2. **ACT**: Spawn agents by priority tier within parallelism limits.
3. **VERIFY**: Run self-check, `oma verify`, and QA cross-review loop.
4. **RECOVER**: Retry failed agents with review history when limits allow.
5. **FINALIZE**: Collect result files, compile summary, and clean progress files.
### Transitions
- If native dispatch is available for current runtime/vendor, use it.
- If vendors differ or native path is unavailable, use fallback spawn.
- If verify or QA fails, feed feedback back to the implementation agent.
- If review loop limits are exceeded, report review history and quality warning.
### Failure and recovery
- Retry failed agents up to configured limits.
- Re-spawn with review history when review loop is exhausted.
- Pause or request re-specification when clarification debt thresholds are exceeded.
### Exit
- Success: all tasks complete, verify/review pass, and results are summarized.
- Partial success: failed agents, exhausted review loops, or clarification debt are explicit.
## Logical Operations
### Actions
| Action | SSL primitive | Evidence |
|--------|---------------|----------|
| Read config and task context | `READ` | oma config, routing, request |
| Select dispatch path | `SELECT` | Native vs fallback |
| Write session state | `WRITE` | task board and memory files |
| Spawn agents | `CALL_TOOL` | native CLI or `oh-my-ag agent:spawn` |
| Poll progress | `READ` | progress/result files |
| Run verification | `CALL_TOOL` | `oma verify`, tests, QA |
| Update retry state | `UPDATE_STATE` | loop counters and CD metrics |
| Report final result | `NOTIFY` | compiled summary |
### Tools and instruments
- Native CLI subagent dispatch, fallback spawn scripts, memory tools, verify script, QA agent
- Session metrics, prompt templates, task templates
### Canonical command path
```bash
oma agent:spawn <agent-type> "<task>" <session-id> -w <workspace>
oma verify <agent-type> --workspace <workspace> --json
```
When native runtime dispatch is available, prefer the runtime-specific native path listed in this skill before falling back to `oma agent:spawn`.
### Resource scope
| Scope | Resource target |
|-------|-----------------|
| `LOCAL_FS` | Session, task-board, progress, result, config files |
| `PROCESS` | Agent CLI processes and verify scripts |
| `MEMORY` | Session state and clarification debt |
| `CODEBASE` | Workspaces owned by spawned agents |
### Preconditions
- Task is decomposable into specialist agent work.
- Runtime/vendor dispatch path or fallback exists.
### Effects and side effects
- Spawns agents and writes session/progress/result artifacts.
- May cause code changes through specialist agents.
- May trigger iterative review and retries.
### Guardrails
1. Orchestrate per-agent dispatch from the project configuration before spawning any agent.
2. If `target_vendor === current_runtime_vendor` and the runtime has a verified native path, use native dispatch.
3. Otherwise fall back to `oh-my-ag agent:spawn`.
4. Never exceed the configured parallelism or retry limits.
5. Keep session state, task-board state, progress files, and result files aligned throughout the run.
Current native executor paths:
- Claude Code: `claude --agent <agent>`
- Codex CLI: `codex exec "@agent ..."` using `.codex/agents/*.toml`
- Gemini CLI: `gemini -p "@agent ..."` using `.gemini/agents/*.md`
Vendor-specific execution protocols are injected automatically for fallback CLI runs.
### Configuration
| Setting | Default | Description |
|---------|---------|-------------|
| MAX_PARALLEL | 3 | Max concurrent subagents |
| MAX_RETRIES | 2 | Retry attempts per failed task |
| POLL_INTERVAL | 30s | Status check interval |
| MAX_TURNS (impl) | 20 | Turn limit for backend/frontend/mobile |
| MAX_TURNS (review) | 15 | Turn limit for qa/debug |
| MAX_TURNS (plan) | 10 | Turn limit for pm |
### Memory Configuration
Memory provider and tool names are configurable via `mcp.json`:
```json
{
"memoryConfig": {
"provider": "serena",
"basePath": ".serena/memories",
"tools": {
"read": "read_memory",
"write": "write_memory",
"edit": "edit_memory"
}
}
}
```
### Workflow Phases
**PHASE 1 - Plan**: Analyze request -> decompose tasks -> generate session ID
**PHASE 2 - Setup**: Use memory write tool to create `orchestrator-session.md` + `task-board.md`
**PHASE 3 - Execute**: Spawn agents by priority tier (never exceed MAX_PARALLEL)
**PHASE 4 - Monitor**: Poll every POLL_INTERVAL; handle completed/failed/crashed agents
**PHASE 4.5 - Verify**: Run `oma verify {agent-type}` per completed agent
**PHASE 5 - Collect**: Read all `result-{agent}-{sessionId}.md`, compile summary, cleanup progress files
See `resources/subagent-prompt-template.md` for prompt construction.
See `resources/memory-schema.md` for memory file formats.
### Memory File Ownership
| File | Owner | Others |
|------|-------|--------|
| `orchestrator-session.md` | orchestrator | read-only |
| `task-board.md` | orchestrator | read-only |
| `progress-{agent}[-{sessionId}].md` | that agent | orchestrator reads |
| `result-{agent}[-{sessionId}].md` | that agent | orchestrator reads |
### Agent-to-Agent Review Loop (PHASE 4.5)
After each agent completes, enter an iterative review loop — not a single-pass verification.
### Loop Flow
```
Agent completes work
↓
[1] Mechanical Self-Check: lint, type-check, tests, diff scope
↓
[2] Verify: Run `oma verify {agent-type} --workspace {workspace}`
↓ FAIL → Agent receives feedback, fixes, back to [1]
↓ PASS
[3] Cross-Review: QA agent reviews the changes
↓ FAIL → Agent receives review feedback, fixes, back to [1]
↓ PASS
Accept result ✓
```
### Step Details
**[1] Mechanical Self-Check** (formerly "Self-Review"):
Before requesting external review, the implementation agent must:
- Run lint, type-check, and tests in the workspace
- Verify only planned files were modified (diff scope check)
- Fix any mechanical failures (compile errors, test failures)
⚠️ **Quality judgment is NOT performed in this step.**
Design quality, architecture alignment, and acceptance criteria satisfaction
are evaluated exclusively in [3] Cross-Review by the QA agent.
Reason: Self-evaluation bias — agents consistently overrate their own output
(ref: Anthropic harness design research).
**[2] Automated Verify**:
```bash
oma verify {agent-type} --workspace {workspace} --json
```
- **PASS (exit 0)**: Proceed to cross-review
- **FAIL (exit 1)**: Feed verify output back to the agent as correction context
**[3] Cross-Review**: Spawn QA agent to review the changes:
- QA agent reads the diff, runs checks, evaluates against acceptance criteria
- If `docs/CODE-REVIEW.md` exists, QA agent uses it as the review checklist
- QA agent outputs: PASS (with optional nits) or FAIL (with specific issues)
- On FAIL: issues are fed back to the implementation agent for fixing
### Loop Limits
| Counter | Max | On Exceeded |
|---------|-----|-------------|
| Self-check + fix cycles | 3 | Escalate to cross-review regardless |
| Cross-review rejections | 2 | Report to user with review history |
| Total loop iterations | 5 | Force-complete with quality warning |
### Review Feedback Format
When feeding review results back to the implementation agent:
```
## Review Feedback (iteration {n}/{max})
**Reviewer**: {self / verify / qa-agent}
**Verdict**: FAIL
**Issues**:
1. {specific issue with file and line reference}
2. {specific issue}
**Fix instruction**: {what to change}
```
This replaces single-pass verification. Most "nitpicking" should happen agent-to-agent.
Human review is reserved for final approval, not catching lint errors.
### Retry Logic (after review loop exhaustion)
- 1st retry: Re-spawn agent with full review history as context
- 2nd retry: Re-spawn with "Try a different approach" + review history
- Final failure: Report to user with complete review trail, ask whether to continue or abort
### Clarification Debt (CD) Monitoring
Track user corrections during session execution. See `../_shared/core/session-metrics.md` for full protocol.
### Event Classification
When user sends feedback during session:
- **clarify** (+10): User answering agent's question
- **correct** (+25): User correcting agent's misunderstanding
- **redo** (+40): User rejecting work, requesting restart
### Threshold Actions
| CD Score | Action |
|----------|--------|
| CD >= 50 | **RCA Required**: QA agent must add entry to `lessons-learned.md` |
| CD >= 80 | **Session Pause**: Request user to re-specify requirements |
| `redo` >= 2 | **Scope Lock**: Request explicit allowlist confirmation before continuing |
### Recording
After each user correction event:
```
[EDIT]("session-metrics.md", append event to Events table)
```
At session end, if CD >= 50:
1. Include CD summary in final report
2. Trigger QA agent RCA generation
3. Update `lessons-learned.md` with prevention measures
## References
- Prompt template: `resources/subagent-prompt-template.md`
- Memory schema: `resources/memory-schema.md`
- Config: `config/cli-config.yaml`
- Scripts: `scripts/spawn-agent.sh`, `scripts/parallel-run.sh`, `scripts/verify.sh`
- Task templates: `templates/`
- Skill-to-agent mapping: `../_shared/core/skill-routing.md`
- Verification: `scripts/verify.sh <agent-type>`
- Session metrics: `../_shared/core/session-metrics.md`
- API contracts: `../_shared/core/api-contracts/`
- Context loading: `../_shared/core/context-loading.md`
- Difficulty guide: `../_shared/core/difficulty-guide.md`
- Reasoning templates: `../_shared/core/reasoning-templates.md`
- Clarification protocol: `../_shared/core/clarification-protocol.md`
- Context budget: `../_shared/core/context-budget.md`
- Lessons learned: `../_shared/core/lessons-learned.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!