Skip to content
Back to skills

Ijfw Debug

ASecurity

Root-cause analysis with hypothesis tracking. Trigger: 'debug', 'broken', 'not working', 'fix this bug', /debug

  • 39 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 1, 2026
ai-agentsgotesting

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 1, 2026

npx -y skills add FerroxLabs/wayland-core --skill ijfw-debug --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ijfw Debug?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ijfw Debug
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ferroxlabs-ijfw-debug/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ferroxlabs-ijfw-debug)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ijfw-debug
description: "Root-cause analysis with hypothesis tracking. Trigger: 'debug', 'broken', 'not working', 'fix this bug', /debug"
---

## Step 1 -- Reproduce
State the failure in one line: what was expected vs. what happened.
Confirm reproducible before proceeding. If intermittent, note conditions.

## Step 2 -- Check recent changes
Call `ijfw_memory_recall` with the symptom. Scan `.ijfw/memory/` for decisions or
changes from the past 7 days that touch the affected area.

If a recent change correlates with the regression, offer revert first:
> `Regression likely from <change> on <date>. Revert first? (y/n)`

## Step 3 -- Isolate
- Narrow to the smallest reproducing case (file, function, line range).
- Determine if failure is input-dependent, environment-dependent, or logic-dependent.
- Read only the specific lines relevant to the hypothesis. No full-file reads.

## Step 4 -- Hypothesize
List hypotheses ranked by likelihood:
```
H1 -- <most likely cause> -- evidence: <why>
H2 -- <next candidate>    -- evidence: <why>
H3 -- <edge case>         -- evidence: <why>
```
Confirm H1 before testing H2.

## Step 5 -- Fix and Verify
Apply the minimal change that addresses the root cause.
Do not fix adjacent issues -- log them as follow-ups.
Run tests/linter after every fix.
Confirm the original symptom is gone and no adjacent regression introduced.
Store result: `ijfw_memory_store: <what broke>, <root cause>, <fix applied>`

## Step 6 -- Two-strikes session reset
If two attempts at root-cause fixes both fail to clear the original symptom, stop. Do not try a third on the same hypothesis tree. Summarize in three lines: what you tried, what each attempt revealed, what you now believe is true. Then ask the user:

> `Two attempts didn't land it. Recommend resetting this session and starting fresh with: "<sharpened prompt>". Accumulated failed context degrades the next attempt; a fresh session with a tighter brief usually clears it on the first try.`

Capture the summary in `ijfw_memory_store` so the next session inherits the lessons without inheriting the noise.

## Output format
```
SYMPTOM:     <one line>
ROOT CAUSE:  <H1 confirmed or revised>
FIX:         <what changed + file:line>
VERIFIED:    yes / needs more testing
FOLLOW-UPS:  <any adjacent issues deferred>
```

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.