Generate a cross-platform multi-model audit (Trident) on a diff, brief, or artifact. Trigger: 'cross audit', 'Trident', 'second opinion', 'check with other models', 'cross-check this', 'get another perspective', /cross-audit
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add FerroxLabs/wayland-core --skill ijfw-cross-audit --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ijfw Cross Audit?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ferroxlabs-ijfw-cross-audit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ijfw-cross-audit
description: "Generate a cross-platform multi-model audit (Trident) on a diff, brief, or artifact. Trigger: 'cross audit', 'Trident', 'second opinion', 'check with other models', 'cross-check this', 'get another perspective', /cross-audit"
---
## Execution
1. **Detect artifact.** Accept: diff, file path, brief text, or `HEAD~1..HEAD`.
If none provided, ask once: `What should I audit? (diff, file, or paste text)`
2. **Detect auditors.** Check PATH for `codex` and `gemini`.
Default: one OpenAI-family + one Google-family, excluding caller's family.
Cap at 4 auditors total.
3. **Dispatch in parallel via background bash** -- never hand off to user.
Prompt each: security findings, logic issues, reliability concerns, test gaps.
```bash
codex "Review for security, logic, reliability, test gaps: <artifact>" &
gemini "Review for security, logic, reliability, test gaps: <artifact>" &
wait
```
4. **Reconcile.** Deduplicate. Classify:
- CONSENSUS -- flagged by 2+ auditors
- CONTESTED -- flagged by 1 auditor only
- PASS -- no issues
5. **Emit report** using the format below.
## Report format rule (all cross-audit outputs)
Any reconciliation report presenting multiple paths MUST use this structure:
```
VERDICT
<one-line converged recommendation>
OPTIONS
A -- <short-name>: <one-line what it is>
B -- <short-name>: <one-line what it is>
REVIEWER CONVERGENCE
<reviewer>: <letter> <score> "<their call>" => Option <letter> -- <name>
RECOMMENDATION
Option <X> -- <name> because <one-sentence why>.
NEXT ACTION
<exact command or step>
```
Never write "Option A" or "Option B" without "-- name" immediately after it on the same line.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!