Use this skill when you need a benchmark testing expert-level multimodal understanding across 30+ subjects using college exam questions. Avoid it when you need basic visual QA evaluation rather than expert-level assessment.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add feiyang-k/curation-bench --skill mmmu-a-massive-multi-discipline-multimodal-understanding-and-reasoning-benchmark-arxiv-2311-16502v3 --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mmmu A Massive Multi Discipline Multimodal Understanding And Reasoning Benchmark Arxiv 2311 16502v3?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/feiyang-k-mmmu-a-massive-multi-discipline-multimodal-underst)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
# MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark
## One-line decision
Use this skill when you need a benchmark testing expert-level multimodal understanding across 30+ subjects using college exam questions. Avoid it when you need basic visual QA evaluation rather than expert-level assessment.
## Skill metadata
- **Skill type**: expert-level-multimodal-benchmark
- **Paper kind**: operational-method
- **Actionability**: high
- **Evidence quality**: full_paper
## Goal
Create an expert-level multimodal benchmark using 11,500 college exam questions across 30+ subjects spanning art, science, engineering, medicine, and more, testing both visual understanding and domain knowledge.
## Problem signature
- Modality: images from academic subjects with expert-level multiple-choice questions.
- Data state: 11,500 questions from college exams and textbooks across 30+ disciplines.
- Scale regime: 11,500 questions across 6 core disciplines and 30+ subjects.
- Model requirement: Any VLM to evaluate at expert level.
## Use when
- You need expert-level multimodal evaluation.
- You want to test VLMs on college-level content.
- You need evaluation across diverse academic disciplines.
## Do not use when
- Basic visual QA evaluation is sufficient.
- You need domain-specific rather than multi-discipline evaluation.
- Your model targets non-academic applications.
## Required inputs
- **exam_questions**: College exam and textbook questions with images.
- **subject_taxonomy**: Taxonomy of 30+ academic subjects.
- **expert_validation**: Domain expert validation of question quality.
## Optional inputs
- **difficulty_labels**: Per-question difficulty ratings.
## Outputs
- **mmmu_scores**: Per-subject and overall expert-level VLM scores.
- **subject_profiles**: VLM performance across 30+ academic disciplines.
## Assumptions and prerequisites
- College exam questions test expert-level understanding.
- Multi-discipline coverage reveals cross-domain capabilities.
- Images from academic sources test diverse visual understanding.
## Procedure
1. **Collect exam questions**
Action: Gather questions from college exams and textbooks across 30+ subjects.
Why: Expert-level questions test deep understanding.
Note: See paper for details.
2. **Curate image-question pairs**
Action: Select questions requiring visual understanding of academic images.
Why: Visual grounding ensures the benchmark tests multimodal capability.
Note: See paper for details.
3. **Validate with domain experts**
Action: Have experts review questions for correctness and difficulty.
Why: Expert validation ensures benchmark quality.
Note: See paper for details.
4. **Evaluate VLMs**
Action: Test VLMs on the benchmark and analyze per-subject performance.
Why: Reveals expert-level capabilities across disciplines.
Note: See paper for details.
## Parameters to set
- **num_subjects** — Role: Number of academic subjects. How to set: 30+ for broad coverage. Default/range: 30+. Effect: More subjects test broader expertise.
- **question_difficulty** — Role: Difficulty level of questions. How to set: College exam level. Default/range: College-level. Effect: Expert-level questions discriminate better.
## Validation checks
- Questions should require both visual understanding and domain knowledge.
- Human expert accuracy should be high (>80%) as a quality check.
- The benchmark should discriminate between model capabilities.
## Failure modes
- Some subjects may be underrepresented.
- College-level questions may have cultural biases.
- Multiple choice format may miss deeper understanding.
## Adaptation notes for VLM training
- MMMU tests whether VLM data includes sufficient domain knowledge.
- Use MMMU to evaluate the impact of domain-specific training data.
- The multi-discipline approach reveals data coverage gaps.
## Implementation notes
- Use the MMMU evaluation server for standardized results.
- Report per-subject and per-discipline performance.
- Compare against human expert baselines.
## Evidence from the paper
- MMMU contains 11,500 college exam questions across 30+ subjects and 6 core disciplines.
- The benchmark tests expert-level multimodal understanding and reasoning.
- Top VLMs (GPT-4V) achieve ~56% on MMMU, well below human expert performance.
- MMMU has become a standard benchmark for testing VLM expertise.
## Source paper
- **Title**: MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark
- **Year**: 2023
- **Venue**: CVPR
- **Paper ID**: arxiv-2311.16502v3
- **URL**: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16502v3
- **arXiv ID**: 2311.16502v3
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!